These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16431956)

  • 1. A femtosecond laser creates a stronger flap than a mechanical microkeratome.
    Kim JY; Kim MJ; Kim TI; Choi HJ; Pak JH; Tchah H
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Feb; 47(2):599-604. PubMed ID: 16431956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measurement of corneal curvature change after mechanical laser in situ keratomileusis flap creation and femtosecond laser flap creation.
    Ortiz D; Alió JL; Piñero D
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Feb; 34(2):238-42. PubMed ID: 18242446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome for LASIK: a randomized controlled study.
    Patel SV; Maguire LJ; McLaren JW; Hodge DO; Bourne WM
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Aug; 114(8):1482-90. PubMed ID: 17350688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stability of the laser in situ keratomileusis corneal flap in rabbit eyes.
    Laurent JM; Schallhorn SC; Spigelmire JR; Tanzer DJ
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Jun; 32(6):1046-51. PubMed ID: 16814069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of original flap creation method on incidence of epithelial ingrowth after LASIK retreatment.
    Letko E; Price MO; Price FW
    J Refract Surg; 2009 Nov; 25(11):1039-41. PubMed ID: 19921773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of corneal aberration changes after laser in situ keratomileusis performed with mechanical microkeratome and IntraLase femtosecond laser: 1-year follow-up.
    Buzzonetti L; Petrocelli G; Valente P; Tamburrelli C; Mosca L; Laborante A; Balestrazzi E
    Cornea; 2008 Feb; 27(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 18216572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the IntraLase femtosecond laser and mechanical microkeratome for laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Lim T; Yang S; Kim M; Tchah H
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 May; 141(5):833-9. PubMed ID: 16678504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the corneal response to laser in situ keratomileusis with flap creation using the FS15 and FS30 femtosecond lasers: clinical and confocal microscopy findings.
    Hu MY; McCulley JP; Cavanagh HD; Bowman RW; Verity SM; Mootha VV; Petroll WM
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Apr; 33(4):673-81. PubMed ID: 17397742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Changes in the refractive index of the human corneal stroma during laser in situ keratomileusis. Effects of exposure time and method used to create the flap.
    Patel S; Alió JL; Artola A
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Jul; 34(7):1077-82. PubMed ID: 18571072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the Ziemer FEMTO LDV femtosecond laser and Moria M2 mechanical microkeratome.
    Zhou Y; Zhang J; Tian L; Zhai C
    J Refract Surg; 2012 Mar; 28(3):189-94. PubMed ID: 22373033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Corneal architecture of femtosecond laser and microkeratome flaps imaged by anterior segment optical coherence tomography.
    von Jagow B; Kohnen T
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Jan; 35(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 19101422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Healing process at the flap edge in its influence in the development of corneal ectasia after LASIK.
    Abdelkader A; Esquenazi S; Shihadeh W; Bazan HE; He J; Gill S; Kaufman HE
    Curr Eye Res; 2006 Nov; 31(11):903-8. PubMed ID: 17114115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of Epi-LASIK and off-flap Epi-LASIK for the treatment of low and moderate myopia.
    Kalyvianaki MI; Kymionis GD; Kounis GA; Panagopoulou SI; Grentzelos MA; Pallikaris IG
    Ophthalmology; 2008 Dec; 115(12):2174-80. PubMed ID: 19041475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Stromal cells change after epipolis laser in situ keratomileusis and laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy in rabbits].
    Chen CD; Zhou XT; Dai JH; Chu RY; Hu M; Yu ZQ; Zhou H; Qu XM
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Sep; 42(9):796-801. PubMed ID: 17173740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Femtosecond laser versus mechanical keratome LASIK for myopia.
    Montés-Micó R; Rodríguez-Galietero A; Alió JL
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 17070593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Comparison of Lasik with femtosecond laser versus Lasik with mechanical microkeratome: predictability of flap depth, corneal biomechanical effects and optical aberrations].
    Kouassi FX; Blaizeau M; Buestel C; Schweitzer C; Gallois A; Colin J; Touboul D
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2012 Jan; 35(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 21676493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Differences in the corneal biomechanical effects of surface ablation compared with laser in situ keratomileusis using a microkeratome or femtosecond laser.
    Hamilton DR; Johnson RD; Lee N; Bourla N
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Dec; 34(12):2049-56. PubMed ID: 19027558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative study of stromal bed quality by using mechanical, IntraLase femtosecond laser 15- and 30-kHz microkeratomes.
    Sarayba MA; Ignacio TS; Binder PS; Tran DB
    Cornea; 2007 May; 26(4):446-51. PubMed ID: 17457194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative study of nJ- and μJ-energy level femtosecond lasers: evaluation of flap adhesion strength, stromal bed quality, and tissue responses.
    Riau AK; Liu YC; Lwin NC; Ang HP; Tan NY; Yam GH; Tan DT; Mehta JS
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Apr; 55(5):3186-94. PubMed ID: 24764066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Postoperative changes in intraocular pressure and corneal biomechanical metrics Laser in situ keratomileusis versus laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy.
    Qazi MA; Sanderson JP; Mahmoud AM; Yoon EY; Roberts CJ; Pepose JS
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1774-88. PubMed ID: 19781475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.