BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16432783)

  • 1. Laparoscopic anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a review of outcome studies.
    Inamasu J; Guiot BH
    Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2005 Dec; 48(6):340-7. PubMed ID: 16432783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative study of laparoscopic L5-S1 fusion versus open mini-ALIF, with a minimum 2-year follow-up.
    Chung SK; Lee SH; Lim SR; Kim DY; Jang JS; Nam KS; Lee HY
    Eur Spine J; 2003 Dec; 12(6):613-7. PubMed ID: 14564558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Retrograde ejaculation after anterior lumbar interbody fusion: transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal exposure.
    Sasso RC; Kenneth Burkus J; LeHuec JC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 May; 28(10):1023-6. PubMed ID: 12768143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Percutaneous axial lumbar interbody fusion (AxiaLIF) of the L5-S1 segment: initial clinical and radiographic experience.
    Aryan HE; Newman CB; Gold JJ; Acosta FL; Coover C; Ames CP
    Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2008 Aug; 51(4):225-30. PubMed ID: 18683115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Balloon-assisted endoscopic retroperitoneal gasless (BERG) technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF).
    Vazquez RM; Gireesan GT
    Surg Endosc; 2003 Feb; 17(2):268-72. PubMed ID: 12399833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanical comparison of a two-level Maverick disc replacement with a hybrid one-level disc replacement and one-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Erkan S; Rivera Y; Wu C; Mehbod AA; Transfeldt EE
    Spine J; 2009 Oct; 9(10):830-5. PubMed ID: 19477692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is laparoscopic anterior lumbar interbody fusion a useful minimally invasive procedure?
    Liu JC; Ondra SL; Angelos P; Ganju A; Landers ML
    Neurosurgery; 2002 Nov; 51(5 Suppl):S155-8. PubMed ID: 12234443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative charge analysis of one- and two-level lumbar total disc arthroplasty versus circumferential lumbar fusion.
    Levin DA; Bendo JA; Quirno M; Errico T; Goldstein J; Spivak J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(25):2905-9. PubMed ID: 18246016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prospective, randomized trial of metal-on-metal artificial lumbar disc replacement: initial results for treatment of discogenic pain.
    Sasso RC; Foulk DM; Hahn M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 18197095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Balloon-assisted endoscopic retroperitoneal gasless approach (BERG) for lumbar interbody fusion: is it a valid alternative to the laparoscopic approach?
    Gazzeri R; Tamorri M; Galarza M; Faiola A; Gazzeri G
    Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2007 Jun; 50(3):150-4. PubMed ID: 17882750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Acquired spondylolysis after implantation of a lumbar ProDisc II prosthesis: case report and review of the literature.
    Schulte TL; Lerner T; Hackenberg L; Liljenqvist U; Bullmann V
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Oct; 32(22):E645-8. PubMed ID: 18090074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rate of failure of indirect decompression in lateral single-position surgery: clinical results.
    Thomas JA; Thomason CIM; Braly BA; Menezes CM
    Neurosurg Focus; 2020 Sep; 49(3):E5. PubMed ID: 32871563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Total lumbar disc replacement: different results for different levels.
    Siepe CJ; Mayer HM; Heinz-Leisenheimer M; Korge A
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Apr; 32(7):782-90. PubMed ID: 17414914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Laparoscopic anterior lumbar interbody spinal fusion].
    Beglaibter N; Zamir O; Milgrum M; Askenazi E; Grinbaum R; Floman Y; Freund H
    Harefuah; 2003 May; 142(5):326-8, 400. PubMed ID: 12803051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Long-segment fusion of the thoracolumbar spine in conjunction with a motion-preserving artificial disc replacement: case report and review of the literature.
    Lehman RA; Lenke LG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Apr; 32(7):E240-5. PubMed ID: 17414900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A prospective comparison of surgical approach for anterior L4-L5 fusion: laparoscopic versus mini anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Zdeblick TA; David SM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Oct; 25(20):2682-7. PubMed ID: 11034657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Laparoscopic approach to L4-L5 for interbody fusion using BAK cages: experience in the first 58 cases.
    Regan JJ; Aronoff RJ; Ohnmeiss DD; Sengupta DK
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Oct; 24(20):2171-4. PubMed ID: 10543017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Retroperitoneal endoscopically assisted minilaparotomy for anterior lumbar interbody fusion: technical feasibility and complications.
    Boos N; Kalberer F; Schoeb O
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Jan; 26(2):E1. PubMed ID: 11154544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Access strategies for revision or explantation of the Charité lumbar artificial disc replacement.
    Wagner WH; Regan JJ; Leary SP; Lanman TH; Johnson JP; Rao RK; Cossman DV
    J Vasc Surg; 2006 Dec; 44(6):1266-72. PubMed ID: 17145428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Tangviriyapaiboon T
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Sep; 91(9):1368-76. PubMed ID: 18843866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.