These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16433077)

  • 1. Comparison of the bond strength of stainless steel orthodontic brackets bonded to crown porcelains.
    Chay SH; Wattanapayungkul P; Yap AU; Loh PL; Chung SM
    Aust Orthod J; 2005 May; 21(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 16433077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Factors affecting the shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets bonded to different ceramic surfaces.
    Abu Alhaija ES; Abu AlReesh IA; AlWahadni AM
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):274-80. PubMed ID: 19903729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Shear bond strength of ceramic brackets with different base designs to feldspathic porcelains.
    Samruajbenjakul B; Kukiattrakoon B
    Angle Orthod; 2009 May; 79(3):571-6. PubMed ID: 19413398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of ceramic surface treatment on shear bond strength of ceramic brackets.
    Ramos TF; Lenza MA; Reges RR; Freitas G
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(6):789-94. PubMed ID: 23649065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison between the shear bond strength of brackets bonded to glazed and deglazed porcelain surfaces with resin-reinforced glass-ionomer cement and a bis-GMA resin adhesive.
    Lifshitz AB; Cárdenas M
    World J Orthod; 2006; 7(2):134-7. PubMed ID: 16779971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Should silane coupling agents be used when bonding brackets to composite restorations? An in vitro study.
    Eslamian L; Ghassemi A; Amini F; Jafari A; Afrand M
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):266-70. PubMed ID: 19193708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Orthodontic bonding to porcelain: a comparison of bonding systems.
    Pannes DD; Bailey DK; Thompson JY; Pietz DM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Jan; 89(1):66-9. PubMed ID: 12589289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of different silanes and acid concentrations on bond strength of brackets to porcelain surfaces.
    Trakyali G; Malkondu O; Kazazoğlu E; Arun T
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):402-6. PubMed ID: 19339674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bonding orthodontic brackets to porcelain using different adhesives/enamel conditioners: a comparative study.
    Bishara SE; Ajlouni R; Oonsombat C; Laffoon J
    World J Orthod; 2005; 6(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 15794038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to porcelain following etching with Er:YAG laser versus hydrofluoric acid.
    Yassaei S; Moradi F; Aghili H; Kamran MH
    Orthodontics (Chic.); 2013; 14(1):e82-7. PubMed ID: 23646342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Shear bond strength of brackets bonded to amalgam with different intermediate resins and adhesives.
    Germec D; Cakan U; Ozdemir FI; Arun T; Cakan M
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Apr; 31(2):207-12. PubMed ID: 19073953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of surface-conditioning methods on shear bond strength of brackets bonded to different all-ceramic materials.
    Saraç YŞ; Külünk T; Elekdağ-Türk S; Saraç D; Türk T
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Dec; 33(6):667-72. PubMed ID: 21228120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with different self-etching adhesives.
    Scougall Vilchis RJ; Yamamoto S; Kitai N; Yamamoto K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):425-30. PubMed ID: 19732677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Four chemical methods of porcelain conditioning and their influence over bond strength and surface integrity.
    Stella JP; Oliveira AB; Nojima LI; Marquezan M
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(4):51-6. PubMed ID: 26352845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ceramic (Feldspathic & IPS Empress II) vs. laboratory composite (Gradia) veneers; a comparison between their shear bond strength to enamel; an in vitro study.
    Nikzad S; Azari A; Dehgan S
    J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Jul; 37(7):569-74. PubMed ID: 20085614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bond strengths of orthodontic brackets to restorative resin composite surfaces.
    Lai PY; Woods MG; Tyas MJ
    Aust Orthod J; 1999 Apr; 15(4):235-45. PubMed ID: 11933358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of surface treatment and artificial aging on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to four different provisional restorations.
    Al Jabbari YS; Al Taweel SM; Al Rifaiy M; Alqahtani MQ; Koutsoukis T; Zinelis S
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Jul; 84(4):649-55. PubMed ID: 24446920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of etching time and light source on the bond strength of metallic brackets to ceramic.
    Gonçalves PR; Moraes RR; Costa AR; Correr AB; Nouer PR; Sinhoreti MA; Correr-Sobrinho L
    Braz Dent J; 2011; 22(3):245-8. PubMed ID: 21915523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fabrication and evaluation of Bis-GMA/TEGDMA resin with various amounts of silane-coated silica for orthodontic use.
    Durrani OK; Bashir U; Arshad N
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Feb; 34(1):62-6. PubMed ID: 21292732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of modifying the bonding protocol on the shear bond strength of metallic and ceramic orthodontic brackets.
    Fernandes TM; Janson G; Somensi J; Pinzan A; Francisconi PA; Sathler R; Henriques JF
    Gen Dent; 2012; 60(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 22313980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.