These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16434132)

  • 1. Pederson scale fails to predict how difficult it will be to extract lower third molars.
    Diniz-Freitas M; Lago-Méndez L; Gude-Sampedro F; Somoza-Martin JM; Gándara-Rey JM; García-García A
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Jan; 45(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 16434132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of Pederson index as an instrument for predicting difficulty of third molar surgical extraction.
    Akadiri OA; Fasola AO; Arotiba JT
    Niger Postgrad Med J; 2009 Jun; 16(2):105-8. PubMed ID: 19606189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relative impact of patient characteristics and radiographic variables on the difficulty of removing impacted mandibular third molars.
    Akadiri OA; Obiechina AE; Arotiba JT; Fasola AO
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 May; 9(4):51-8. PubMed ID: 18473027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of factors associated with surgical difficulty during removal of impacted lower third molars.
    Carvalho RW; do Egito Vasconcelos BC
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 69(11):2714-21. PubMed ID: 21752507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pell-Gregory classification is unreliable as a predictor of difficulty in extracting impacted lower third molars.
    García AG; Sampedro FG; Rey JG; Vila PG; Martin MS
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2000 Dec; 38(6):585-587. PubMed ID: 11092770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of Kharma scale as a predictor of lower third molar extraction difficulty.
    Al-Samman AA
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2017 Nov; 22(6):e796-e799. PubMed ID: 29053661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of factors associated with surgical difficulty in impacted mandibular third molar extraction.
    Gbotolorun OM; Arotiba GT; Ladeinde AL
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Oct; 65(10):1977-83. PubMed ID: 17884525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Difficulty of impacted mandibular third molar tooth removal: predictive ability of senior surgeons and residents.
    Komerik N; Muglali M; Tas B; Selcuk U
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Jun; 72(6):1062.e1-6. PubMed ID: 24656427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Classification of surgical difficulty in extracting impacted third molars.
    Yuasa H; Kawai T; Sugiura M
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2002 Feb; 40(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 11883966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of factors associated with surgical difficulty during removal of impacted maxillary third molars.
    de Carvalho RW; de Araújo Filho RC; do Egito Vasconcelos BC
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 May; 71(5):839-45. PubMed ID: 23598549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Surgical approach to impacted mandibular third molars--operative classification.
    Abu-El Naaj I; Braun R; Leiser Y; Peled M
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Mar; 68(3):628-33. PubMed ID: 20031288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Kissing molars.
    Boffano P; Gallesio C
    J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 20(4):1269-70. PubMed ID: 19625844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Radiographical evaluation of bone quality after extraction of mandibular impacted and semi-impacted third molars.
    Alonso MB; Costa PP; Issa JP; Monteiro SA; Tiossi R; Watanabe PC
    Minerva Stomatol; 2011; 60(7-8):359-64. PubMed ID: 21709651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Patient anxiety and surgical difficulty in impacted lower third molar extractions: a prospective cohort study.
    Aznar-Arasa L; Figueiredo R; Valmaseda-Castellón E; Gay-Escoda C
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 43(9):1131-6. PubMed ID: 24837553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Classification of lower impacted third molars position and their interrelationship with mandibular canal].
    Kuzin AV; Vedyaeva AP; Sogacheva VV; Remizov GV
    Stomatologiia (Mosk); 2023; 102(5):66-69. PubMed ID: 37937926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Surgical extraction of deeply horizontally impacted mandibular second and third molars.
    Boffano P; Gallesio C; Bianchi F; Roccia F
    J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Mar; 21(2):403-6. PubMed ID: 20186075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Extraoral removal of a lower third molar tooth.
    Milner N; Baker A
    Br Dent J; 2005 Sep; 199(6):345-6. PubMed ID: 16184106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of difficulty in third molar surgery--a systematic review.
    Akadiri OA; Obiechina AE
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 67(4):771-4. PubMed ID: 19304033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Surgical removal of impacted third molars.
    Mehra P; Koerner KR; Baran S
    Dent Today; 2007 Mar; 26(3):120, 122-5; quiz 125, 112. PubMed ID: 17441522
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Periodontal healing after 'orthodontic extraction' of mandibular third molars: a retrospective cohort study.
    Montevecchi M; Incerti Parenti S; Checchi V; Palumbo B; Checchi L; Alessandri Bonetti G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 43(9):1137-41. PubMed ID: 24774723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.