480 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16434133)
41. Oblique lumbar interbody fixation: a biomechanical study in human spines.
St Clair S; Tan JS; Lieberman I
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Jun; 25(4):183-9. PubMed ID: 21423058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. [Biomechanical evaluation of the U shape lumbar biological dynamic fixation system].
Xue J; Jin AM; Yu B; Zhao WD; Feng W
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2009 Feb; 29(2):239-41. PubMed ID: 19246288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Effect of lumbar interbody cage geometry on construct stability: a cadaveric study.
Vadapalli S; Robon M; Biyani A; Sairyo K; Khandha A; Goel VK
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Sep; 31(19):2189-94. PubMed ID: 16946652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Biomechanical evaluation of an interspinous stabilizing device, Locker.
Shim CS; Park SW; Lee SH; Lim TJ; Chun K; Kim DH
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Oct; 33(22):E820-7. PubMed ID: 18923305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. A pedicle screw system and a lamina hook system provide similar primary and long-term stability: a biomechanical in vitro study with quasi-static and dynamic loading conditions.
Wilke HJ; Kaiser D; Volkheimer D; Hackenbroch C; Püschel K; Rauschmann M
Eur Spine J; 2016 Sep; 25(9):2919-28. PubMed ID: 27405823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. The effect of cement augmentation and extension of posterior instrumentation on stabilization and adjacent level effects in the elderly spine.
Tan JS; Singh S; Zhu QA; Dvorak MF; Fisher CG; Oxland TR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Dec; 33(25):2728-40. PubMed ID: 19050578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Enhancing the stability of anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a biomechanical comparison of anterior plate versus posterior transpedicular instrumentation.
Tzermiadianos MN; Mekhail A; Voronov LI; Zook J; Havey RM; Renner SM; Carandang G; Abjornson C; Patwardhan AG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(2):E38-43. PubMed ID: 18197089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Biomechanical comparison of four C1 to C2 rigid fixative techniques: anterior transarticular, posterior transarticular, C1 to C2 pedicle, and C1 to C2 intralaminar screws.
Lapsiwala SB; Anderson PA; Oza A; Resnick DK
Neurosurgery; 2006 Mar; 58(3):516-21; discussion 516-21. PubMed ID: 16528192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Novel dual-rod screw for thoracoscopic anterior instrumentation: biomechanical evaluation compared with single-rod and double-screw/double-rod anterior constructs.
Zhang H; Sucato DJ; Pierce WA; Ross D
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Mar; 34(5):E183-8. PubMed ID: 19247158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Biomechanics of a Posterior Lumbar Motion Stabilizing Device: In Vitro Comparison to Intact and Fused Conditions.
Perez-Orribo L; Zucherman JF; Hsu KY; Reyes PM; Rodriguez-Martinez NG; Crawford NR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Jan; 41(2):E55-63. PubMed ID: 26335667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Posterior thoracic extrapedicular fixation: a biomechanical study.
Morgenstern W; Ferguson SJ; Berey S; Orr TE; Nolte LP
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Aug; 28(16):1829-35. PubMed ID: 12923470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Biomechanical analysis of anterior versus posterior instrumentation following a thoracolumbar corpectomy: Laboratory investigation.
Viljoen SV; DeVries Watson NA; Grosland NM; Torner J; Dalm B; Hitchon PW
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Oct; 21(4):577-81. PubMed ID: 25084029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Biomechanical effect of the extent of vertebral body fracture on the thoracolumbar spine with pedicle screw fixation: an in vitro study.
Wang XY; Dai LY; Xu HZ; Chi YL
J Clin Neurosci; 2008 Mar; 15(3):286-90. PubMed ID: 18226530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. [Biomechanical evaluation of asymmetrical posterior internal fixation for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with transfacetopedicular screws].
Ao J; Jin AM; Zhao WD; Zhang H; Min SX; Yu B; Chen WY
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2009 May; 29(5):959-61, 965. PubMed ID: 19460720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Which posterior instrumentation is better for two-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion: translaminar facet screw or pedicle screw?
Hou Y; Shen Y; Liu Z; Nie Z
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2013 Jan; 133(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 23109094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. [Biomechanical evaluation of stiffness of long-segment instrumented spine].
Zhang J; Lu WW; Ye QB; Qiu GX
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2005 Apr; 27(2):153-5. PubMed ID: 15960256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. A biomechanical evaluation of an interspinous device (Coflex) used to stabilize the lumbar spine.
Tsai KJ; Murakami H; Lowery GL; Hutton WC
J Surg Orthop Adv; 2006; 15(3):167-72. PubMed ID: 17087886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Comparison of the effects of bilateral posterior dynamic and rigid fixation devices on the loads in the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis.
Rohlmann A; Burra NK; Zander T; Bergmann G
Eur Spine J; 2007 Aug; 16(8):1223-31. PubMed ID: 17206401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Biomechanical effect of different interspinous devices on lumbar spinal range of motion under preload conditions.
Hartmann F; Dietz SO; Hely H; Rommens PM; Gercek E
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2011 Jul; 131(7):917-26. PubMed ID: 21190031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Stabilizing potential of anterior, posterior, and circumferential fixation for multilevel cervical arthrodesis: an in vitro human cadaveric study of the operative and adjacent segment kinematics.
Dmitriev AE; Kuklo TR; Lehman RA; Rosner MK
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(6):E188-96. PubMed ID: 17413459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
