480 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16434133)
61. Anterior thoracolumbar instrumentation: stiffness and load sharing characteristics of plate and rod systems.
Brodke DS; Gollogly S; Bachus KN; Alexander Mohr R; Nguyen BK
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Aug; 28(16):1794-801. PubMed ID: 12923465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Biomechanical comparison of anterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Ploumis A; Wu C; Fischer G; Mehbod AA; Wu W; Faundez A; Transfeldt EE
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Apr; 21(2):120-5. PubMed ID: 18391717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Dynamic lumbar pedicle screw-rod stabilization: in vitro biomechanical comparison with standard rigid pedicle screw-rod stabilization.
Bozkuş H; Senoğlu M; Baek S; Sawa AG; Ozer AF; Sonntag VK; Crawford NR
J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Feb; 12(2):183-9. PubMed ID: 20121354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Adjacent segment motion after a simulated lumbar fusion in different sagittal alignments: a biomechanical analysis.
Akamaru T; Kawahara N; Tim Yoon S; Minamide A; Su Kim K; Tomita K; Hutton WC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jul; 28(14):1560-6. PubMed ID: 12865845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Unilateral and bilateral sacropelvic fixation result in similar construct biomechanics.
Tomlinson T; Chen J; Upasani V; Mahar A
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Sep; 33(20):2127-33. PubMed ID: 18794753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Biomechanical assessment of a PEEK rod system for semi-rigid fixation of lumbar fusion constructs.
Gornet MF; Chan FW; Coleman JC; Murrell B; Nockels RP; Taylor BA; Lanman TH; Ochoa JA
J Biomech Eng; 2011 Aug; 133(8):081009. PubMed ID: 21950902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. [Biomechanical analysis of lumbar spine after implantation of a disk prosthesis and supplementary spinal fusion for management of complications].
Birnbaum K; Phoa T; Maus U; Prescher A; Weisskopf M
Z Orthop Unfall; 2009; 147(4):493-500. PubMed ID: 19693744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Preventing distal pullout of posterior spine instrumentation in thoracic hyperkyphosis: a biomechanical analysis.
Sun E; Alkalay R; Vader D; Snyder BD
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Jun; 22(4):270-7. PubMed ID: 19494747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Does superior-segment facet violation or laminectomy destabilize the adjacent level in lumbar transpedicular fixation? An in vitro human cadaveric assessment.
Cardoso MJ; Dmitriev AE; Helgeson M; Lehman RA; Kuklo TR; Rosner MK
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Dec; 33(26):2868-73. PubMed ID: 19092616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. A biomechanical analysis of the self-retaining pedicle hook device in posterior spinal fixation.
van Laar W; Meester RJ; Smit TH; van Royen BJ
Eur Spine J; 2007 Aug; 16(8):1209-14. PubMed ID: 17203270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Biomechanical comparison of translaminar versus pedicle screws at T1 and T2 in long subaxial cervical constructs.
McGirt MJ; Sutter EG; Xu R; Sciubba DM; Wolinsky JP; Witham TF; Gokaslan ZL; Bydon A
Neurosurgery; 2009 Dec; 65(6 Suppl):167-72; discussion 172. PubMed ID: 19934991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Analysis of pedicle and translaminar facet fixation in a multisegment interbody fusion model.
Eskander M; Brooks D; Ordway N; Dale E; Connolly P
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Apr; 32(7):E230-5. PubMed ID: 17414898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Biomechanical and clinical evaluation of a novel technique for surgical repair of spondylolysis in adolescents.
Ulibarri JA; Anderson PA; Escarcega T; Mann D; Noonan KJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Aug; 31(18):2067-72. PubMed ID: 16915090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Biomechanical differences between transfacet and lateral mass screw-rod constructs for multilevel posterior cervical spine stabilization.
Miyanji F; Mahar A; Oka R; Newton P
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Nov; 33(23):E865-9. PubMed ID: 18978579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Influence of Dynesys system screw profile on adjacent segment and screw.
Liu CL; Zhong ZC; Shih SL; Hung C; Lee YE; Chen CS
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Aug; 23(6):410-7. PubMed ID: 20683426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. [The biomechanical study of craniovertebral junction fixation with posterior transarticular screw].
Yan WJ; Cai B; Chen Y; Yuan W; Li JS; Jia LS; Yang GB; Zeng WM
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Apr; 86(13):872-5. PubMed ID: 16759510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Multidirectional stabilizing potential of BAK interbody spinal fusion system for anterior surgery.
Nibu K; Panjabi MM; Oxland T; Cholewicki J
J Spinal Disord; 1997 Aug; 10(4):357-62. PubMed ID: 9278922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. How does spinal canal decompression and dorsal stabilization affect segmental mobility? A biomechanical study.
Delank KS; Gercek E; Kuhn S; Hartmann F; Hely H; Röllinghoff M; Rothschild MA; Stützer H; Sobottke R; Eysel P
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2010 Feb; 130(2):285-92. PubMed ID: 19936771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Biomechanical analysis of pedicle screw thread differential design in an osteoporotic cadaver model.
Mehta H; Santos E; Ledonio C; Sembrano J; Ellingson A; Pare P; Murrell B; Nuckley DJ
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Mar; 27(3):234-40. PubMed ID: 22071427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. A comparison of biomechanical stability and pullout strength of two C1-C2 fixation constructs.
Savage JW; Limthongkul W; Park HS; Zhang LQ; Karaikovic EE
Spine J; 2011 Jul; 11(7):654-8. PubMed ID: 21640660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
