These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16434169)

  • 21. Asymmetric glottal jet deflection: differences of two- and three-dimensional models.
    Mattheus W; Brücker C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Dec; 130(6):EL373-9. PubMed ID: 22225129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Voice production model integrating boundary-layer analysis of glottal flow and source-filter coupling.
    Kaburagi T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Mar; 129(3):1554-67. PubMed ID: 21428519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Whispering--a single-subject study of glottal configuration and aerodynamics.
    Sundberg J; Scherer R; Hess M; Müller F
    J Voice; 2010 Sep; 24(5):574-84. PubMed ID: 19850445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Asymmetric airflow and vibration induced by the Coanda effect in a symmetric model of the vocal folds.
    Tao C; Zhang Y; Hottinger DG; Jiang JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2270-8. PubMed ID: 17902863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Three-dimensional nature of the glottal jet.
    Triep M; Brücker C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Mar; 127(3):1537-47. PubMed ID: 20329854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Low-dimensional models of the glottal flow incorporating viscous-inviscid interaction.
    Kaburagi T; Tanabe Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jan; 125(1):391-404. PubMed ID: 19173426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Geometry of human vocal folds and glottal channel for mathematical and biomechanical modeling of voice production.
    Sidlof P; Svec JG; Horácek J; Veselý J; Klepácek I; Havlík R
    J Biomech; 2008; 41(5):985-95. PubMed ID: 18289553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Entrance loss coefficients and exit coefficients for a physical model of the glottis with convergent angles.
    Fulcher LP; Scherer RC; Anderson NV
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Sep; 136(3):1312. PubMed ID: 25190404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The effects of the false vocal fold gaps on intralaryngeal pressure distributions and their effects on phonation.
    Li S; Wan M; Wang S
    Sci China C Life Sci; 2008 Nov; 51(11):1045-51. PubMed ID: 18989648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Investigation of four distinct glottal configurations in classical singing--a pilot study.
    Herbst CT; Ternström S; Svec JG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Mar; 125(3):EL104-9. PubMed ID: 19275279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Time-Dependent Pressure and Flow Behavior of a Self-oscillating Laryngeal Model With Ventricular Folds.
    Alipour F; Scherer RC
    J Voice; 2015 Nov; 29(6):649-59. PubMed ID: 25873541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Modeling coupled aerodynamics and vocal fold dynamics using immersed boundary methods.
    Duncan C; Zhai G; Scherer R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Nov; 120(5 Pt 1):2859-71. PubMed ID: 17139744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Optimal glottal configuration for ease of phonation.
    Lucero JC
    J Voice; 1998 Jun; 12(2):151-8. PubMed ID: 9649070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Optimized transformation of the glottal motion into a mechanical model.
    Triep M; Brücker C; Stingl M; Döllinger M
    Med Eng Phys; 2011 Mar; 33(2):210-7. PubMed ID: 21115384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Glottal flow through a two-mass model: comparison of Navier-Stokes solutions with simplified models.
    de Vries MP; Schutte HK; Veldman AE; Verkerke GJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Apr; 111(4):1847-53. PubMed ID: 12002868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Numerical simulation of turbulence transition and sound radiation for flow through a rigid glottal model.
    Suh J; Frankel SH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jun; 121(6):3728-39. PubMed ID: 17552723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Further studies of phonation threshold pressure in a physical model of the vocal fold mucosa.
    Chan RW; Titze IR; Titze MR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Jun; 101(6):3722-7. PubMed ID: 9193059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effect of three-dimensional glottal geometry on intraglottal quasi-steady flow distributions and their relationship with phonation.
    Li S; Scherer RC; Wan M; Wang S
    Sci China C Life Sci; 2006 Feb; 49(1):82-8. PubMed ID: 16544579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Direct-numerical simulation of the glottal jet and vocal-fold dynamics in a three-dimensional laryngeal model.
    Zheng X; Mittal R; Xue Q; Bielamowicz S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):404-15. PubMed ID: 21786908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Influence of a constriction in the near field of the vocal folds: physical modeling and experimental validation.
    Bailly L; Pelorson X; Henrich N; Ruty N
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Nov; 124(5):3296-308. PubMed ID: 19045812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.