76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16434518)
1. The effect of fixation and location on the stability of the markers in navigated total hip arthroplasty: a cadaver study.
Mayr E; de la Barrera JL; Eller G; Bach C; Nogler M
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Feb; 88(2):168-72. PubMed ID: 16434518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Soft tissue dissection in placement of reference markers during computer aided total hip arthroplasty.
Board TN; Kendoff D; Citak M; Krettek C; Hüfner T
Comput Aided Surg; 2008 Jul; 13(4):218-24. PubMed ID: 18622796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Safe femoral pin placement in knee navigation surgery: a cadaver study.
Marchant DC; Rimmington DP; Nusem I; Crawford RW
Comput Aided Surg; 2004; 9(6):257-60. PubMed ID: 16112976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Experimental validation of noninvasive referencing in navigated procedures on long bones.
Kendoff D; Bogojević A; Citak M; Citak M; Maier C; Maier G; Krettek C; Hüfner T
J Orthop Res; 2007 Feb; 25(2):201-7. PubMed ID: 17089402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The figure-of-four axis as a reference to determine stem rotation in hip arthroplasty. What does it really measure? A cadaver study.
Mayr E; Thaler M; Williams A; Moctezuma de La Barrera J; Krismer M; Nogler M
Acta Orthop; 2007 Aug; 78(4):458-62. PubMed ID: 17965998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Experimental validation of a pinless femoral reference array for computer-assisted hip arthroplasty.
Renkawitz T; Wegner M; Gneiting S; Haimerl M; Sendtner E; Kalteis T; Grifka J
J Orthop Res; 2010 May; 28(5):583-8. PubMed ID: 19950361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical comparison of two side plate fixation techniques in an unstable intertrochanteric osteotomy model: Sliding Hip Screw and Percutaneous Compression Plate.
Krischak GD; Augat P; Beck A; Arand M; Baier B; Blakytny R; Gebhard F; Claes L
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Dec; 22(10):1112-8. PubMed ID: 17900766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reference marker stability in computer aided orthopedic surgery: a biomechanical study in artificial bone and cadavers.
Citak M; Board TN; Sun Y; Look V; Krettek C; Hüfner T; Kendoff D
Technol Health Care; 2007; 15(6):407-14. PubMed ID: 18057564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanics of the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
Ong KL; Kurtz SM; Manley MT; Rushton N; Mohammed NA; Field RE
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Aug; 88(8):1110-5. PubMed ID: 16877617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Tension band wire fixation for valgus osteotomies of the proximal femur: a biomechanical study of three configurations of fixation.
Volpon JB; Batista LC; Shimano MM; Moro CA
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 May; 23(4):395-401. PubMed ID: 18187241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is determination of the hip rotation center during computer-assisted surgery influenced by the pinless femoral sensor attachment method? An in vitro preliminary study comparing osseous pin fixation.
de Thomasson E; Gouzy S; Cloerec F; Geais L
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2016 May; 102(3):375-8. PubMed ID: 26969205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of hip position on the length of trochanteric muscles: potential implications for early postoperative management of hip arthroplasty.
Lee YC; Callary SA; Howie DW; Thewlis D; Solomon LB
J Arthroplasty; 2012 Jun; 27(6):953-60.e1-2. PubMed ID: 22054906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Harms technique of C1-C2 fixation with polyaxial screws and rods].
Stulík J; Vyskocil T; Sebesta P; Kryl J
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2005; 72(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 15860148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does ischial screw fixation improve mechanical stability in revision total hip arthroplasty?
Meneghini RM; Stultz AD; Watson JS; Ziemba-Davis M; Buckley CA
J Arthroplasty; 2010 Oct; 25(7):1157-61. PubMed ID: 19679432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of one- and two-pin reference anchoring systems on marker stability during total knee arthroplasty computer navigation.
Mihalko WM; Duquin T; Axelrod JR; Bayers-Thering M; Krackow KA
Comput Aided Surg; 2006 Mar; 11(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 16782645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Postural balance during quiet standing in patients with total hip arthroplasty and surface replacement arthroplasty.
Nantel J; Termoz N; Centomo H; Lavigne M; Vendittoli PA; Prince F
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 May; 23(4):402-7. PubMed ID: 18079029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Which procedure better restores intact hip range of motion: total hip arthroplasty or resurfacing? A combined cadaveric and computer simulation study.
Incavo SJ; Thompson MT; Gold JE; Patel RV; Icenogle KD; Noble PC
J Arthroplasty; 2011 Apr; 26(3):391-7. PubMed ID: 20378308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical analysis of supracondylar humerus fracture pinning for slightly malreduced fractures.
Bloom T; Robertson C; Mahar AT; Newton P
J Pediatr Orthop; 2008; 28(7):766-72. PubMed ID: 18812905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of implant overlap on the mechanical properties of the femur.
Harris T; Ruth JT; Szivek J; Haywood B
J Trauma; 2003 May; 54(5):930-5. PubMed ID: 12777906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cadaveric analysis of capsular attachments of the distal femur related to pin and wire placement.
Lowery K; Dearden P; Sherman K; Mahadevan V; Sharma H
Injury; 2015; 46(6):970-4. PubMed ID: 25835529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
