BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16434597)

  • 1. Evaluating bias due to population stratification in epidemiologic studies of gene-gene or gene-environment interactions.
    Wang Y; Localio R; Rebbeck TR
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2006 Jan; 15(1):124-32. PubMed ID: 16434597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bias correction with a single null marker for population stratification in candidate gene association studies.
    Wang Y; Localio R; Rebbeck TR
    Hum Hered; 2005; 59(3):165-75. PubMed ID: 15920341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Population stratification bias in the case-only study for gene-environment interactions.
    Wang LY; Lee WC
    Am J Epidemiol; 2008 Jul; 168(2):197-201. PubMed ID: 18497429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A systematic approach to analysing gene-gene interactions: polymorphisms at the microsomal epoxide hydrolase EPHX and glutathione S-transferase GSTM1, GSTT1, and GSTP1 loci and breast cancer risk.
    Spurdle AB; Chang JH; Byrnes GB; Chen X; Dite GS; McCredie MR; Giles GG; Southey MC; Chenevix-Trench G; Hopper JL
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2007 Apr; 16(4):769-74. PubMed ID: 17416769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A strategy to discover genes that carry multi-allelic or mono-allelic risk for common diseases: a cohort allelic sums test (CAST).
    Morgenthaler S; Thilly WG
    Mutat Res; 2007 Feb; 615(1-2):28-56. PubMed ID: 17101154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Methods for interaction analyses using family-based case-control data: conditional logistic regression versus generalized estimating equations.
    Hancock DB; Martin ER; Li YJ; Scott WK
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Dec; 31(8):883-93. PubMed ID: 17565751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Misclassification in case-control studies of gene-environment interactions: assessment of bias and sample size.
    Garcia-Closas M; Rothman N; Lubin J
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1999 Dec; 8(12):1043-50. PubMed ID: 10613335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the use of population attributable fraction to determine sample size for case-control studies of gene-environment interaction.
    Yang Q; Khoury MJ; Friedman JM; Flanders WD
    Epidemiology; 2003 Mar; 14(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 12606881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Gene-environment studies: any advantage over environmental studies?
    Bermejo JL; Hemminki K
    Carcinogenesis; 2007 Jul; 28(7):1526-32. PubMed ID: 17389613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does the relationship between IgE and the CD14 gene depend on ethnicity?
    Zhang G; Goldblatt J; LeSouëf PN
    Allergy; 2008 Nov; 63(11):1411-7. PubMed ID: 18925877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Use of case-parents trio for epidemiological studies of association between genetic polymorphisms and complex diseases].
    Santos JL; Pérez F; Carrasco E; Albala C
    Rev Med Chil; 2002 Nov; 130(11):1307-15. PubMed ID: 12587516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Joint effect of genes and environment distorted by selection biases: implications for hospital-based case-control studies.
    Wacholder S; Chatterjee N; Hartge P
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2002 Sep; 11(9):885-9. PubMed ID: 12223433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tests for gene-environment interaction from case-control data: a novel study of type I error, power and designs.
    Mukherjee B; Ahn J; Gruber SB; Rennert G; Moreno V; Chatterjee N
    Genet Epidemiol; 2008 Nov; 32(7):615-26. PubMed ID: 18473390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Implications of small effect sizes of individual genetic variants on the design and interpretation of genetic association studies of complex diseases.
    Ioannidis JP; Trikalinos TA; Khoury MJ
    Am J Epidemiol; 2006 Oct; 164(7):609-14. PubMed ID: 16893921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Population stratification in the candidate gene study: fatal threat or red herring?
    Hutchison KE; Stallings M; McGeary J; Bryan A
    Psychol Bull; 2004 Jan; 130(1):66-79. PubMed ID: 14717650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Design and analysis issues in case-control studies addressing genetic susceptibility.
    Brennan P
    IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (148):123-32. PubMed ID: 10493254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sample size requirements for indirect association studies of gene-environment interactions (G x E).
    Hein R; Beckmann L; Chang-Claude J
    Genet Epidemiol; 2008 Apr; 32(3):235-45. PubMed ID: 18163529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detecting genotype combinations that increase risk for disease: maternal-fetal genotype incompatibility test.
    Sinsheimer JS; Palmer CG; Woodward JA
    Genet Epidemiol; 2003 Jan; 24(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 12508251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Study design options in evaluating gene-environment interactions: practical considerations for a planned case-control study of pediatric leukemia.
    Goodman M; Dana Flanders W
    Pediatr Blood Cancer; 2007 Apr; 48(4):375-9. PubMed ID: 16874764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Confounding in genetic association studies and its solutions.
    Hu D; Ziv E
    Methods Mol Biol; 2008; 448():31-9. PubMed ID: 18370229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.