These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16435691)

  • 1. Target acquisition with UAVs: vigilance displays and advanced cuing interfaces.
    Gunn DV; Warm JS; Nelson WT; Bolia RS; Schumsky DA; Corcoran KJ
    Hum Factors; 2005; 47(3):488-97. PubMed ID: 16435691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of Touch, Voice, and Multimodal Input, and Task Load on Multiple-UAV Monitoring Performance During Simulated Manned-Unmanned Teaming in a Military Helicopter.
    Levulis SJ; DeLucia PR; Kim SY
    Hum Factors; 2018 Dec; 60(8):1117-1129. PubMed ID: 30063411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mission control of multiple unmanned aerial vehicles: a workload analysis.
    Dixon SR; Wickens CD; Chang D
    Hum Factors; 2005; 47(3):479-87. PubMed ID: 16435690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A meta-analysis of human-system interfaces in unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) swarm management.
    Hocraffer A; Nam CS
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Jan; 58():66-80. PubMed ID: 27633199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Unmanned aerial vehicles for surveying marine fauna: assessing detection probability.
    Hodgson A; Peel D; Kelly N
    Ecol Appl; 2017 Jun; 27(4):1253-1267. PubMed ID: 28178755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Design considerations to improve cognitive ergonomic issues of unmanned vehicle interfaces utilizing video game controllers.
    Oppold P; Rupp M; Mouloua M; Hancock PA; Martin J
    Work; 2012; 41 Suppl 1():5609-11. PubMed ID: 22317628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Auditory decision aiding in supervisory control of multiple unmanned aerial vehicles.
    Donmez B; Cummings ML; Graham HD
    Hum Factors; 2009 Oct; 51(5):718-29. PubMed ID: 20196296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Target cuing in visual search: the effects of conformality and display location on the allocation of visual attention.
    Yeh M; Wickens CD; Seagull FJ
    Hum Factors; 1999 Dec; 41(4):524-42. PubMed ID: 10774124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. UAV-guided navigation for ground robot tele-operation in a military reconnaissance environment.
    Chen JY
    Ergonomics; 2010 Aug; 53(8):940-50. PubMed ID: 20658388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Head up versus head down: the costs of imprecision, unreliability, and visual clutter on cue effectiveness for display signaling.
    Yeh M; Merlo JL; Wickens CD; Brandenburg DL
    Hum Factors; 2003; 45(3):390-407. PubMed ID: 14702991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Target detection performance in helmet-mounted and conventional dome displays.
    Hettinger LJ; Nelson WT; Haas MW
    Int J Aviat Psychol; 1996; 6(4):321-34. PubMed ID: 11540400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Aurally aided visual search in three-dimensional space.
    Bolia RS; D'Angelo WR; McKinley RL
    Hum Factors; 1999 Dec; 41(4):664-9. PubMed ID: 10774135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Concurrent 3-D sonifications enable the head-up monitoring of two interrelated aircraft navigation instruments.
    Towers J; Burgess-Limerick R; Riek S
    Hum Factors; 2014 Dec; 56(8):1414-27. PubMed ID: 25509822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Design and test of a situation-augmented display for an unmanned aerial vehicle monitoring task.
    Lu JL; Horng RY; Chao CJ
    Percept Mot Skills; 2013 Aug; 117(1):1187-207. PubMed ID: 24422345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spatialized audio improves call sign recognition during multi-aircraft control.
    Kim S; Miller ME; Rusnock CF; Elshaw JJ
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Jul; 70():51-58. PubMed ID: 29866325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Independence and Interdependence of Coacting Observers in Regard to Performance Efficiency, Workload, and Stress in a Vigilance Task.
    Funke GJ; Warm JS; Baldwin CL; Garcia A; Funke ME; Dillard MB; Finomore VS; Matthews G; Greenlee ET
    Hum Factors; 2016 Sep; 58(6):915-26. PubMed ID: 27150529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reference frame congruency in search-and-rescue tasks.
    Pavlovic NJ; Keillor J; Hollands JG; Chignell MH
    Hum Factors; 2009 Apr; 51(2):240-50. PubMed ID: 19653486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. New alternative methods of analyzing human behavior in cued target acquisition.
    Maltz M; Shinar D
    Hum Factors; 2003; 45(2):281-95. PubMed ID: 14529199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Display signaling in augmented reality: effects of cue reliability and image realism on attention allocation and trust calibration.
    Yeh M; Wickens CD
    Hum Factors; 2001; 43(3):355-65. PubMed ID: 11866192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Automation reliability in unmanned aerial vehicle control: a reliance-compliance model of automation dependence in high workload.
    Dixon SR; Wickens CD
    Hum Factors; 2006; 48(3):474-86. PubMed ID: 17063963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.