These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16435697)

  • 1. Audio and visual cues in a two-talker divided attention speech-monitoring task.
    Brungart DS; Kordik AJ; Simpson BD
    Hum Factors; 2005; 47(3):562-73. PubMed ID: 16435697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Asymmetric performance in the cocktail party effect: implications for the design of spatial audio displays.
    Boila RS; Nelson WT; Morley RM
    Hum Factors; 2001; 43(2):208-16. PubMed ID: 11592662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Simple displays of talker location improve voice identification performance in multitalker, spatialized audio environments.
    Kilgore RM
    Hum Factors; 2009 Apr; 51(2):224-39. PubMed ID: 19653485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Audio-visual speech intelligibility benefits with bilateral cochlear implants when talker location varies.
    van Hoesel RJ
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2015 Apr; 16(2):309-15. PubMed ID: 25582430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Looking Behavior and Audiovisual Speech Understanding in Children With Normal Hearing and Children With Mild Bilateral or Unilateral Hearing Loss.
    Lewis DE; Smith NA; Spalding JL; Valente DL
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(4):783-794. PubMed ID: 29252979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visual Speech Benefit in Clear and Degraded Speech Depends on the Auditory Intelligibility of the Talker and the Number of Background Talkers.
    Blackburn CL; Kitterick PT; Jones G; Sumner CJ; Stacey PC
    Trends Hear; 2019; 23():2331216519837866. PubMed ID: 30909814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Divided listening in the free field becomes asymmetric when acoustic cues are limited.
    Fumero MJ; Marrufo-Pérez MI; Eustaquio-Martín A; Lopez-Poveda EA
    Hear Res; 2022 Mar; 416():108444. PubMed ID: 35078133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of multiple simultaneous talkers.
    Brungart DS; Simpson BD; Ericson MA; Scott KR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Nov; 110(5 Pt 1):2527-38. PubMed ID: 11757942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Effect of Sound Localization on Auditory-Only and Audiovisual Speech Recognition in a Simulated Multitalker Environment.
    Sheffield SW; Wheeler HJ; Brungart DS; Bernstein JGW
    Trends Hear; 2023; 27():23312165231186040. PubMed ID: 37415497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spatial and temporal modifications of multitalker speech can improve speech perception in older adults.
    Gygi B; Shafiro V
    Hear Res; 2014 Apr; 310():76-86. PubMed ID: 24530609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of informational masking in reverberant, multi-talker environments.
    Westermann A; Buchholz JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Aug; 138(2):584-93. PubMed ID: 26328677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. EEG activity evoked in preparation for multi-talker listening by adults and children.
    Holmes E; Kitterick PT; Summerfield AQ
    Hear Res; 2016 Jun; 336():83-100. PubMed ID: 27178442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Infants' listening in multitalker environments: effect of the number of background talkers.
    Newman RS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 May; 71(4):822-36. PubMed ID: 19429961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of Spatial Speech Presentation on Listener Response Strategy for Talker-Identification.
    Uhrig S; Perkis A; Möller S; Svensson UP; Behne DM
    Front Neurosci; 2021; 15():730744. PubMed ID: 35153653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of interferer facing orientation on speech perception by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Strelcyk O; Pentony S; Kalluri S; Edwards B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1419-32. PubMed ID: 24606279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Talker- and language-specific effects on speech intelligibility in noise assessed with bilingual talkers: Which language is more robust against noise and reverberation?
    Hochmuth S; Jürgens T; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():23-34. PubMed ID: 26486466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cueing listeners to attend to a target talker progressively improves word report as the duration of the cue-target interval lengthens to 2,000 ms.
    Holmes E; Kitterick PT; Summerfield AQ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Aug; 80(6):1520-1538. PubMed ID: 29696570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Factors that can affect divided speech intelligibility.
    Fumero MJ; Marrufo-Pérez MI; Eustaquio-Martín A; Lopez-Poveda EA
    Hear Res; 2024 Jan; 441():108917. PubMed ID: 38061268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gaze patterns and audiovisual speech enhancement.
    Yi A; Wong W; Eizenman M
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Apr; 56(2):471-80. PubMed ID: 23275394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of spatial configuration and fundamental frequency on speech intelligibility in multiple-talker conditions in the ipsilateral horizontal plane and median planea).
    Yao D; Zhao J; Wang L; Shang Z; Gu J; Wang Y; Jia M; Li J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2024 May; 155(5):2934-2947. PubMed ID: 38717201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.