273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16435936)
1. Examining assumptions about item responding in personality assessment: should ideal point methods be considered for scale development and scoring?
Stark S; Chernyshenko OS; Drasgow F; Williams BA
J Appl Psychol; 2006 Jan; 91(1):25-39. PubMed ID: 16435936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Constructing personality scales under the assumptions of an ideal point response process: toward increasing the flexibility of personality measures.
Chernyshenko OS; Stark S; Drasgow F; Roberts BW
Psychol Assess; 2007 Mar; 19(1):88-106. PubMed ID: 17371125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fitting measurement models to vocational interest data: are dominance models ideal?
Tay L; Drasgow F; Rounds J; Williams BA
J Appl Psychol; 2009 Sep; 94(5):1287-304. PubMed ID: 19702371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Global, local, and graphical person-fit analysis using person-response functions.
Emons WH; Sijtsma K; Meijer RR
Psychol Methods; 2005 Mar; 10(1):101-19. PubMed ID: 15810871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Examining the Process of Responding to Circumplex Scales of Interpersonal Values Items: Should Ideal Point Scoring Methods Be Considered?
Ling Y; Zhang M; Locke KD; Li G; Li Z
J Pers Assess; 2016; 98(3):310-8. PubMed ID: 26421444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detecting differential item functioning with confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: toward a unified strategy.
Stark S; Chernyshenko OS; Drasgow F
J Appl Psychol; 2006 Nov; 91(6):1292-306. PubMed ID: 17100485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multiple imputation for item scores when test data are factorially complex.
van Ginkel JR; van der Ark LA; Sijtsma K
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 Nov; 60(Pt 2):315-37. PubMed ID: 17971272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Application of four procedures for detecting differential item functioning in polytomous items].
Elosua P; López-Jáuregui A
Psicothema; 2007 May; 19(2):329-36. PubMed ID: 17425906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fitting Item Response Theory Models to Two Personality Inventories: Issues and Insights.
Chernyshenko OS; Stark S; Chan KY; Drasgow F; Williams B
Multivariate Behav Res; 2001 Oct; 36(4):523-62. PubMed ID: 26822181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Item characteristics that predict response latency in personality measures].
Ferrando PJ; Demestre J
Psicothema; 2007 May; 19(2):337-42. PubMed ID: 17425907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Incremental validity of the frame-of-reference effect in personality scale scores: a replication and extension.
Bing MN; Whanger JC; Davison HK; VanHook JB
J Appl Psychol; 2004 Feb; 89(1):150-7. PubMed ID: 14769127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. On the meaning of the latent variables in the CT-C(M-1) model: a comment on Maydeu-Olivares and Coffman (2006).
Geiser C; Eid M; Nussbeck FW
Psychol Methods; 2008 Mar; 13(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 18331153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How do respondents construe ambiguous response formats of affect items?
Segura SL; Gonzalez-Roma V
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2003 Nov; 85(5):956-68. PubMed ID: 14599257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Item response theory analyses of physical functioning items in the medical outcomes study.
Hays RD; Liu H; Spritzer K; Cella D
Med Care; 2007 May; 45(5 Suppl 1):S32-8. PubMed ID: 17443117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A within-person examination of the ideal-point response process.
LaPalme M; Tay L; Wang W
Psychol Assess; 2018 May; 30(5):567-581. PubMed ID: 28557481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The role of item extremity in the emergence of keying-related factors: an exploration with the life orientation test.
McPherson J; Mohr P
Psychol Methods; 2005 Mar; 10(1):120-31. PubMed ID: 15810872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Application of the pi* goodness-of-fit index to latent structure models].
Revuelta J; Kessel D
Psicothema; 2007 May; 19(2):322-8. PubMed ID: 17425905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Matches Made With Information: Fitting Measurement Models to Adult Attachment Data.
Sun T; Fraley RC; Drasgow F
Assessment; 2021 Oct; 28(7):1828-1847. PubMed ID: 33185133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Social anxiety and fear of negative evaluation: construct validity of the BFNE-II.
Carleton RN; Collimore KC; Asmundson GJ
J Anxiety Disord; 2007; 21(1):131-41. PubMed ID: 16675196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Using effect sizes for research reporting: examples using item response theory to analyze differential item functioning.
Steinberg L; Thissen D
Psychol Methods; 2006 Dec; 11(4):402-15. PubMed ID: 17154754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
