1133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16436147)
1. Strong allergic patch test reactions may indicate a general disposition for contact allergy.
Brasch J; Schnuch A; Uter W;
Allergy; 2006 Mar; 61(3):364-9. PubMed ID: 16436147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Contact allergy in children referred for patch testing: North American Contact Dermatitis Group data, 2001-2004.
Zug KA; McGinley-Smith D; Warshaw EM; Taylor JS; Rietschel RL; Maibach HI; Belsito DV; Fowler JF; Storrs FJ; DeLeo VA; Marks JG; Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Sasseville D
Arch Dermatol; 2008 Oct; 144(10):1329-36. PubMed ID: 18936397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A further characteristic of susceptibility to contact allergy: sensitization to a weak contact allergen is associated with polysensitization. Results of the IVDK.
Schnuch A; Brasch J; Lessmann H; Geier J; Uter W
Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Jun; 56(6):331-7. PubMed ID: 17577374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Path test reactions to the Chinese Standard Screening Allergens in 1,135 patients investigated for allergic contact dermatitis.
Liu YQ; Zhao B; Zhuang LH; Fan WX
Am J Contact Dermat; 1997 Sep; 8(3):141-3. PubMed ID: 9249281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prevalence and relevance of contact dermatitis allergens: a meta-analysis of 15 years of published T.R.U.E. test data.
Krob HA; Fleischer AB; D'Agostino R; Haverstock CL; Feldman S
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2004 Sep; 51(3):349-53. PubMed ID: 15337975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Result of standard patch test in patients suspected of having allergic contact dermatitis.
Wongpiyabovorn J; Puvabanditsin P
J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Sep; 88 Suppl 4():S177-83. PubMed ID: 16623025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Epicutaneous patch test results in children and adults with allergic contact dermatitis in Karlovac county: a retrospective survey.
Kuljanac I; Knežević E; Cvitanović H
Acta Dermatovenerol Croat; 2011; 19(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 21703155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Changing trends and allergens in the patch test standard series: a mayo clinic 5-year retrospective review, january 1, 2001, through december 31, 2005.
Davis MD; Scalf LA; Yiannias JA; Cheng JF; El-Azhary RA; Rohlinger AL; Farmer SA; Fett DD; Johnson JS; Linehan DL; Richardson DM; Schroeter AL; Connolly SM
Arch Dermatol; 2008 Jan; 144(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 18209170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Simultaneous sodium lauryl sulphate testing improves the diagnostic validity of allergic patch tests. Results from a prospective multicentre study of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (Deutsche Kontaktallergie-Gruppe, DKG).
Löffler H; Becker D; Brasch J; Geier J;
Br J Dermatol; 2005 Apr; 152(4):709-19. PubMed ID: 15840103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reactivity to patch tests with nickel sulfate and fragrance mix in infants.
Jøhnke H; Norberg LA; Vach W; Bindslev-Jensen C; Høst A; Andersen KE
Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Sep; 51(3):141-7. PubMed ID: 15479203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Positive patch test reactions to nickel sulphate are not modified by neighbouring negative fragrance patch tests. A multicenter-study by the German contact dermatitis research group.
Brasch J; Weichenthal M; Szliska C; Löffler H; Koch P; Grabbe J; Mahler V; Kreilgård B; Hoeck U;
Acta Derm Venereol; 2006; 86(4):345-7. PubMed ID: 16874422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Trends of contact allergy to fragrance mix I and Myroxylon pereirae among Danish eczema patients tested between 1985 and 2007.
Thyssen JP; Carlsen BC; Menné T; Johansen JD
Contact Dermatitis; 2008 Oct; 59(4):238-44. PubMed ID: 18844700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Which children should we patch test?
Beattie PE; Green C; Lowe G; Lewis-Jones MS
Clin Exp Dermatol; 2007 Jan; 32(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 17004990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contact allergy in eczema patients in Thammasat University Hospital.
Disphanurat W
J Med Assoc Thai; 2010 Dec; 93 Suppl 7():S7-14. PubMed ID: 21294394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A retrospective study of patch tests in Chongqing, China from 2004 to 2009.
Yin R; Huang XY; Zhou XF; Hao F
Contact Dermatitis; 2011 Jul; 65(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 21309787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The profile of patch test reactions to common contact allergens is related to sex.
Brasch J; Schnuch A; Uter W; ;
Contact Dermatitis; 2008 Jan; 58(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 18154557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Patch test results with the metalworking fluid series of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (DKG).
Geier J; Lessmann H; Dickel H; Frosch PJ; Koch P; Becker D; Jappe U; Aberer W; Schnuch A; Uter W
Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Sep; 51(3):118-30. PubMed ID: 15479200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Late reactions to the patch-test preparations para-phenylenediamine and epoxy resin: a prospective multicentre investigation of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group.
Hillen U; Jappe U; Frosch PJ; Becker D; Brasch J; Lilie M; Fuchs T; Kreft B; Pirker C; Geier J;
Br J Dermatol; 2006 Apr; 154(4):665-70. PubMed ID: 16536809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Concomitant positive reactions to allergens in a patch testing standard series from 1988-1997.
Albert MR; Chang Y; González E
Am J Contact Dermat; 1999 Dec; 10(4):219-23. PubMed ID: 10594298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Standard patch test results in patients with contact dermatitis in Israel: age and sex differences.
Freireich-Astman M; David M; Trattner A
Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Feb; 56(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 17244079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
