These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16436478)

  • 1. Contralateral white noise selectively changes left human auditory cortex activity in a lexical decision task.
    Behne N; Wendt B; Scheich H; Brechmann A
    J Neurophysiol; 2006 Apr; 95(4):2630-7. PubMed ID: 16436478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contralateral White Noise Selectively Changes Right Human Auditory Cortex Activity Caused by a FM-Direction Task.
    Behne N; Scheich H; Brechmann A
    J Neurophysiol; 2005 Jan; 93(1):414-23. PubMed ID: 15356179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of masking on the activation of auditory-associated cortex during speech listening in white noise.
    Hwang JH; Wu CW; Chen JH; Liu TC
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2006 Sep; 126(9):916-20. PubMed ID: 16864487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Late auditory evoked potentials asymmetry revisited.
    Hine J; Debener S
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Jun; 118(6):1274-85. PubMed ID: 17462945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Time course and hemispheric lateralization effects of complex pitch processing: evoked magnetic fields in response to rippled noise stimuli.
    Hertrich I; Mathiak K; Lutzenberger W; Ackermann H
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(13):1814-26. PubMed ID: 15351630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Activation of human auditory cortex during speech perception: effects of monaural, binaural, and dichotic presentation.
    Stefanatos GA; Joe WQ; Aguirre GK; Detre JA; Wetmore G
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Jan; 46(1):301-15. PubMed ID: 18023460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evidence for rapid auditory perception as the foundation of speech processing: a sparse temporal sampling fMRI study.
    Zaehle T; Wüstenberg T; Meyer M; Jäncke L
    Eur J Neurosci; 2004 Nov; 20(9):2447-56. PubMed ID: 15525285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Lateral response dynamics and hemispheric dominance for speech perception.
    Hunter MD; Lee KH; Tandon P; Parks RW; Wilkinson ID; Woodruff PW
    Neuroreport; 2007 Aug; 18(12):1295-9. PubMed ID: 17632286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interhemispheric support during demanding auditory signal-in-noise processing.
    Stracke H; Okamoto H; Pantev C
    Cereb Cortex; 2009 Jun; 19(6):1440-7. PubMed ID: 18936273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modality-independent involvement of the left BA 44 during lexical decision making.
    Heim S; Eickhoff SB; Ischebeck AK; Supp G; Amunts K
    Brain Struct Funct; 2007 Jul; 212(1):95-106. PubMed ID: 17717701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Activation patterns of the primary auditory cortex in normal-hearing subjects: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.
    Menéndez-Colino LM; Falcón C; Traserra J; Berenguer J; Pujol T; Doménech J; Bernal-Sprekelsen M
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2007 Dec; 127(12):1283-91. PubMed ID: 17851933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Active stream segregation specifically involves the left human auditory cortex.
    Deike S; Scheich H; Brechmann A
    Hear Res; 2010 Jun; 265(1-2):30-7. PubMed ID: 20233603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Division of labor between left and right human auditory cortices during the processing of intensity and duration.
    Angenstein N; Brechmann A
    Neuroimage; 2013 Dec; 83():1-11. PubMed ID: 23831528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Results of a functional magnetic resonance study of the primary auditory cortex (I): general characteristics and individual outcomes].
    Menéndez-Colino LM; Traserra J; Falcón C; Berenguer J; Pujol T; Doménech J; Bernal-Sprekelsen M
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 2009; 60(3):160-8. PubMed ID: 19558901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dynamic movement of N100m current sources in auditory evoked fields: comparison of ipsilateral versus contralateral responses in human auditory cortex.
    Jin CY; Ozaki I; Suzuki Y; Baba M; Hashimoto I
    Neurosci Res; 2008 Apr; 60(4):397-405. PubMed ID: 18276027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A recovery from enhancement of activation in auditory cortex of patients with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss.
    Morita T; Hiraumi H; Fujiki N; Naito Y; Nagamine T; Fukuyama H; Ito J
    Neurosci Res; 2007 May; 58(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 17316856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Right hemisphere dominance for auditory attention and its modulation by eye position: an event related fMRI study.
    Petit L; Simon G; Joliot M; Andersson F; Bertin T; Zago L; Mellet E; Tzourio-Mazoyer N
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2007; 25(3-4):211-25. PubMed ID: 17943000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Segmental processing in the human auditory dorsal stream.
    Zaehle T; Geiser E; Alter K; Jancke L; Meyer M
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1220():179-90. PubMed ID: 18096139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Working memory specific activity in auditory cortex: potential correlates of sequential processing and maintenance.
    Brechmann A; Gaschler-Markefski B; Sohr M; Yoneda K; Kaulisch T; Scheich H
    Cereb Cortex; 2007 Nov; 17(11):2544-52. PubMed ID: 17204817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of the task of categorizing FM direction on auditory evoked magnetic fields in the human auditory cortex.
    König R; Sieluzycki C; Simserides C; Heil P; Scheich H
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1220():102-17. PubMed ID: 18420183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.