BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16436684)

  • 1. Rapid face-selective adaptation of an early extrastriate component in MEG.
    Harris A; Nakayama K
    Cereb Cortex; 2007 Jan; 17(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 16436684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rapid adaptation of the m170 response: importance of face parts.
    Harris A; Nakayama K
    Cereb Cortex; 2008 Feb; 18(2):467-76. PubMed ID: 17573371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stages of processing in face perception: an MEG study.
    Liu J; Harris A; Kanwisher N
    Nat Neurosci; 2002 Sep; 5(9):910-6. PubMed ID: 12195430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The M170 is selective for faces, not for expertise.
    Xu Y; Liu J; Kanwisher N
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(4):588-97. PubMed ID: 15716149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The M170 reflects a viewpoint-dependent representation for both familiar and unfamiliar faces.
    Ewbank MP; Smith WA; Hancock ER; Andrews TJ
    Cereb Cortex; 2008 Feb; 18(2):364-70. PubMed ID: 17507454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Face recognition and cortical responses: effect of stimulus duration.
    Tanskanen T; Näsänen R; Ojanpää H; Hari R
    Neuroimage; 2007 May; 35(4):1636-44. PubMed ID: 17412612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Normal and abnormal face selectivity of the M170 response in developmental prosopagnosics.
    Harris AM; Duchaine BC; Nakayama K
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(14):2125-36. PubMed ID: 16243056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spatiotemporal dynamics and connectivity pattern differences between centrally and peripherally presented faces.
    Liu L; Ioannides AA
    Neuroimage; 2006 Jul; 31(4):1726-40. PubMed ID: 16564185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of parts, wholes, and familiarity on face-selective responses in MEG.
    Harris AM; Aguirre GK
    J Vis; 2008 Aug; 8(10):4.1-12. PubMed ID: 19146346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electrophysiological correlates of visual adaptation to faces and body parts in humans.
    Kovács G; Zimmer M; Bankó E; Harza I; Antal A; Vidnyánszky Z
    Cereb Cortex; 2006 May; 16(5):742-53. PubMed ID: 16120795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Early cortical responses are sensitive to changes in face stimuli.
    Susac A; Ilmoniemi RJ; Pihko E; Ranken D; Supek S
    Brain Res; 2010 Jul; 1346():155-64. PubMed ID: 20510886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Brain responses to repetitions of human and animal faces, inverted faces, and objects: an MEG study.
    Schweinberger SR; Kaufmann JM; Moratti S; Keil A; Burton AM
    Brain Res; 2007 Dec; 1184():226-33. PubMed ID: 17976538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. EEG-MEG evidence for early differential repetition effects for fearful, happy and neutral faces.
    Morel S; Ponz A; Mercier M; Vuilleumier P; George N
    Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 1254():84-98. PubMed ID: 19073158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Endogenous context for visual processing of human faces and other objects.
    Braeutigam S; Swithenby SJ
    Neuroreport; 2003 Jul; 14(10):1385-9. PubMed ID: 12876479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Response profile of the face-sensitive N170 component: a rapid adaptation study.
    Eimer M; Kiss M; Nicholas S
    Cereb Cortex; 2010 Oct; 20(10):2442-52. PubMed ID: 20080930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Inversion and contrast-reversal effects on face processing assessed by MEG.
    Itier RJ; Herdman AT; George N; Cheyne D; Taylor MJ
    Brain Res; 2006 Oct; 1115(1):108-20. PubMed ID: 16930564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dynamic brain activation patterns for face recognition: a magnetoencephalography study.
    Lee D; Simos P; Sawrie SM; Martin RC; Knowlton RC
    Brain Topogr; 2005; 18(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 16193263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electrophysiological correlates of visual adaptation and sensory competition.
    Kovács G; Zimmer M; Volberg G; Lavric I; Rossion B
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Jul; 51(8):1488-96. PubMed ID: 23643797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Discrepancy between reaction time and visual evoked magnetic response latency under priming.
    Hashimoto A; Inui K; Watanabe S; Kakigi R
    Neurosci Res; 2008 Mar; 60(3):244-9. PubMed ID: 18177961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of face spatial frequencies on cortical processing revealed by magnetoencephalography.
    Hsiao FJ; Hsieh JC; Lin YY; Chang Y
    Neurosci Lett; 2005 May 20-27; 380(1-2):54-9. PubMed ID: 15854750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.