BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

299 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16436790)

  • 21. Can nurses appropriately interpret the Ottawa Ankle Rule?
    Fiesseler F; Szucs P; Kec R; Richman PB
    Am J Emerg Med; 2004 May; 22(3):145-8. PubMed ID: 15138947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Diagnostic accuracy and reproducibility in the interpretation of Ottawa ankle and foot rules by specialized emergency nurses.
    Derksen RJ; Bakker FC; Geervliet PC; de Lange-de Klerk ES; Heilbron EA; Veenings B; Patka P; Haarman HJ
    Am J Emerg Med; 2005 Oct; 23(6):725-9. PubMed ID: 16182978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Accuracy of the Ottawa Ankle Rules applied by non-physician providers in a pediatric emergency department.
    MacLellan J; Smith T; Baserman J; Dowling S
    CJEM; 2018 Sep; 20(5):746-752. PubMed ID: 28965519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Ultrasound-assisted triage of ankle trauma can decrease the need for radiographic imaging.
    Hedelin H; Goksör LÅ; Karlsson J; Stjernström S
    Am J Emerg Med; 2013 Dec; 31(12):1686-9. PubMed ID: 24157071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Efficiency of the Modified Ottawa ankle rules for the differential diagnosis of fracture in acute foot and ankle injury].
    Li N; Liu YS; Xin JY; Ma XL; Mei XL; Shi ZQ; Li G; Sun ZH
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Sep; 97(35):2742-2745. PubMed ID: 28954331
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Validation of the Ottawa ankle rules in a Danish emergency department.
    Knudsen R; Vijdea R; Damborg F
    Dan Med Bull; 2010 May; 57(5):A4142. PubMed ID: 20441713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Use of the Ottawa Ankle Rules in children: a survey of physicians' practice patterns.
    Dowling SK; Wishart I
    CJEM; 2011 Sep; 13(5):333-8; E44-6. PubMed ID: 21955415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Accuracy of Ottawa ankle rules for midfoot and ankle injuries.
    Yavas S; Arslan ED; Ozkan S; Yilmaz Aydin Y; Aydin M
    Acta Biomed; 2021 Sep; 92(4):e2021241. PubMed ID: 34487104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A case-control study of the transit times through an accident and emergency department of ankle injured patients assessed using the Ottawa Ankle Rules.
    Allerston J; Justham D
    Accid Emerg Nurs; 2000 Jul; 8(3):148-54. PubMed ID: 10893558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Incomplete documentation of elements of Ottawa Ankle Rules despite an electronic medical record.
    Salazar L; Best TM; Hiestand B
    Am J Emerg Med; 2011 Nov; 29(9):999-1002. PubMed ID: 20674227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The sonographic Ottawa Foot and Ankle Rules study (the SOFAR study).
    Canagasabey MD; Callaghan MJ; Carley S
    Emerg Med J; 2011 Oct; 28(10):838-40. PubMed ID: 20943841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Multicentre trial to introduce the Ottawa ankle rules for use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Multicentre Ankle Rule Study Group.
    Stiell I; Wells G; Laupacis A; Brison R; Verbeek R; Vandemheen K; Naylor CD
    BMJ; 1995 Sep; 311(7005):594-7. PubMed ID: 7663253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The accuracy of bedside ultrasonography as a diagnostic tool for fractures in the ankle and foot.
    Atilla OD; Yesilaras M; Kilic TY; Tur FC; Reisoglu A; Sever M; Aksay E
    Acad Emerg Med; 2014 Sep; 21(9):1058-61. PubMed ID: 25269589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Clinical application of the Ottawa ankle rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries: an independent site assessment.
    Verma S; Hamilton K; Hawkins HH; Kothari R; Singal B; Buncher R; Nguyen P; O'Neill M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Sep; 169(3):825-7. PubMed ID: 9275906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of patient satisfaction and outcomes after assessment for acute ankle injuries.
    Wilson DE; Noseworthy TW; Rowe BH; Holroyd BR
    Am J Emerg Med; 2002 Jan; 20(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 11781906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Minimising negative ankle and foot X-rays in the Emergency Department -- are the Ottawa ankle rules good enough?
    Crosswell S; Leaman A; Phung W
    Injury; 2014 Dec; 45(12):2002-4. PubMed ID: 25257400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Usefulness of Ottawa rules for acute injuries of ankle and foot].
    Palapa García LR; Regla Márquez H
    Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc; 2005; 43(4):293-8. PubMed ID: 16164846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effectiveness of emergency nurses' use of the Ottawa Ankle Rules to initiate radiographic tests on improving healthcare outcomes for patients with ankle injuries: A systematic review.
    Ho JK; Chau JP; Cheung NM
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2016 Nov; 63():37-47. PubMed ID: 27592083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A prospective study of modified Ottawa ankle rules in a military population. Interobserver agreement between physical therapists and orthopaedic surgeons.
    Springer BA; Arciero RA; Tenuta JJ; Taylor DC
    Am J Sports Med; 2000; 28(6):864-8. PubMed ID: 11101110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Validation of the Sonographic Ottawa Foot and Ankle Rules (SOFAR) Study in a Large Urban Trauma Center.
    Tollefson B; Nichols J; Fromang S; Summers RL
    J Miss State Med Assoc; 2016 Feb; 57(2):35-8. PubMed ID: 27141765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.