436 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16436987)
1. Long-term assessment after implantation of the Vibrant Soundbridge device.
Schmuziger N; Schimmann F; àWengen D; Patscheke J; Probst R
Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):183-8. PubMed ID: 16436987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Vibrant Soundbridge for hearing restoration after chronic ear surgery.
Streitberger C; Perotti M; Beltrame MA; Giarbini N
Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2009; 130(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 19813469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Vibrant Sound Bridge System. A new kind hearing prosthesis for patients with sensorineural hearing loss. 2. Audiological results].
Lenarz T; Weber BP; Issing PR; Gnadeberg D; Ambjørnsen K; Mack KF; Winter M
Laryngorhinootologie; 2001 Jul; 80(7):370-80. PubMed ID: 11488147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Audiological application criteria for implantable hearing aid devices: a clinical experience at the Nijmegen ORL clinic.
Verhaegen VJ; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW; Snik AF
Laryngoscope; 2008 Sep; 118(9):1645-9. PubMed ID: 18677283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Active middle ear implants in patients undergoing subtotal petrosectomy: new application for the Vibrant Soundbridge device and its implication for lateral cranium base surgery.
Linder T; Schlegel C; DeMin N; van der Westhuizen S
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Jan; 30(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 18849883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Active middle ear implantation in elderly people: a retrospective study.
Wolf-Magele A; Schnabl J; Woellner T; Koci V; Riechelmann H; Sprinzl GM
Otol Neurotol; 2011 Jul; 32(5):805-11. PubMed ID: 21512424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Vibrant soundbridge versus conventional hearing aid in sensorineural high-frequency hearing loss: a prospective study.
Truy E; Philibert B; Vesson JF; Labassi S; Collet L
Otol Neurotol; 2008 Aug; 29(5):684-7. PubMed ID: 18434928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Exclusive transcanal surgical approach for Vibrant Soundbridge implantation: surgical and functional results.
Bruschini L; Forli F; Giannarelli M; Bruschini P; Berrettini S
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Oct; 30(7):950-5. PubMed ID: 19730149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Active middle ear implant compared with open-fit hearing aid in sloping high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
Boeheim K; Pok SM; Schloegel M; Filzmoser P
Otol Neurotol; 2010 Apr; 31(3):424-9. PubMed ID: 20042907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Minimal access surgery for the Symphonix/Med-El Vibrant Soundbridge middle ear hearing implant.
Foyt D; Carfrae M
Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):167-71. PubMed ID: 16436985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Our auditory results using the Vibrant Soundbridge on the long process of the incus: 20 years of data.
Grégoire A; Van Damme JP; Gilain C; Bihin B; Garin P
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2018 Feb; 45(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 28285827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness: speech in noise and directional hearing effects with bone-anchored hearing and contralateral routing of signal amplification.
Lin LM; Bowditch S; Anderson MJ; May B; Cox KM; Niparko JK
Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):172-82. PubMed ID: 16436986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Otologics fully implantable hearing system: Phase I trial 1-year results.
Jenkins HA; Atkins JS; Horlbeck D; Hoffer ME; Balough B; Alexiades G; Garvis W
Otol Neurotol; 2008 Jun; 29(4):534-41. PubMed ID: 18317397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Otologics middle ear transducer with contralateral conventional hearing aid in severe sensorineural hearing loss: evolution during the first 24 months.
Tringali S; Perrot X; Berger P; Granade GL; Dubreuil C; Truy E
Otol Neurotol; 2010 Jun; 31(4):630-6. PubMed ID: 20418795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A middle ear implant, the Symphonix Vibrant Soundbridge: retrospective study of the first 125 patients implanted in France.
Sterkers O; Boucarra D; Labassi S; Bebear JP; Dubreuil C; Frachet B; Fraysse B; Lavieille JP; Magnan J; Martin C; Truy E; Uziel A; Vaneecloo FM
Otol Neurotol; 2003 May; 24(3):427-36. PubMed ID: 12806295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Vibrant Soundbridge surgery in patients with severe external otitis: complications of a transcanal approach.
Zwartenkot JW; Mulder JJ; Snik AF; Cremers CW
Otol Neurotol; 2011 Apr; 32(3):398-402. PubMed ID: 21307813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bilateral vibrant soundbridge implantation: audiologic and subjective benefits in quiet and noisy environments.
Garin P; Schmerber S; Magnan J; Truy E; Uziel A; Triglia JM; Bebear JP; Labassi S; Lavieille JP
Acta Otolaryngol; 2010 Dec; 130(12):1370-8. PubMed ID: 20819026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cochlear implants for adults obtaining marginal benefit from acoustic amplification: a European study.
Fraysse B; Dillier N; Klenzner T; Laszig R; Manrique M; Morera Perez C; Morgon AH; Müller-Deile J; Ramos Macias A
Am J Otol; 1998 Sep; 19(5):591-7. PubMed ID: 9752966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cochlear implantation in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 and bilateral vestibular schwannoma.
Lustig LR; Yeagle J; Driscoll CL; Blevins N; Francis H; Niparko JK
Otol Neurotol; 2006 Jun; 27(4):512-8. PubMed ID: 16791043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Vibrant Soundbridge middle ear implant in mixed hearing loss. Indications, techniques, results.
Dumon T; Gratacap B; Firmin F; Vincent R; Pialoux R; Casse B; Firmin B
Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2009; 130(2):75-81. PubMed ID: 19813468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
