These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16437053)
21. Sensitivity and daily quality control of a mobile PET/CT scanner operating in 3-dimensional mode. Belakhlef A; Church C; Fraser R; Lakhanpal S J Nucl Med Technol; 2007 Dec; 35(4):229-31. PubMed ID: 18006593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Experimental evaluation of fiber-interspaced antiscatter grids for large patient imaging with digital x-ray systems. Fetterly KA; Schueler BA Phys Med Biol; 2007 Aug; 52(16):4863-80. PubMed ID: 17671340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Performance characteristics and quality assurance aspects of kilovoltage cone-beam CT on medical linear accelerator. Saw CB; Yang Y; Li F; Yue NJ; Ding C; Komanduri K; Huq S; Heron DE Med Dosim; 2007; 32(2):80-5. PubMed ID: 17472886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A quantitative image quality comparison of four different image guided radiotherapy devices. Stützel J; Oelfke U; Nill S Radiother Oncol; 2008 Jan; 86(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 18031854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. How to measure CT image quality: variations in CT-numbers, uniformity and low contrast resolution for a CT quality assurance phantom. Gulliksrud K; Stokke C; Martinsen AC Phys Med; 2014 Jun; 30(4):521-6. PubMed ID: 24530005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. MRI quality control tools for procedures and analyses. Di Nallo AM; Ortenzia O; D'Arienzo M; Coniglio D; Benassi M J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2006 Mar; 25(1):121-7. PubMed ID: 16761628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Image-guided radiotherapy using a mobile kilovoltage x-ray device. Sorensen SP; Chow PE; Kriminski S; Medin PM; Solberg TD Med Dosim; 2006; 31(1):40-50. PubMed ID: 16551528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Calibrating automatic exposure control devices for digital radiography. Doyle P; Martin CJ Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(21):5475-85. PubMed ID: 17047264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Artifacts in digital mammography. Van Ongeval C; Jacobs J; Bosmans H JBR-BTR; 2008; 91(6):262-3. PubMed ID: 19203002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Characterization of a parallel-beam CCD optical-CT apparatus for 3D radiation dosimetry. Krstajić N; Doran SJ Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3693-713. PubMed ID: 17664571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Verification imaging using a computed radiography system for high-energy electron beam therapy. Fujita H; Yamaguchi M; Katsuda T; Sakamoto H; Fujioka T; Tada T; Azuma M Radiat Med; 2005 Dec; 23(8):550-6. PubMed ID: 16555563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Technical advances of interventional fluoroscopy and flat panel image receptor. Lin PJ Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):650-7. PubMed ID: 18849699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Noise properties of chord-image reconstruction. Xia D; Yu L; Sidky EY; Zou Y; Zuo N; Pan X IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 Oct; 26(10):1328-44. PubMed ID: 17948724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Optimization of image quality and dose for Varian aS500 electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs). McGarry CK; Grattan MW; Cosgrove VP Phys Med Biol; 2007 Dec; 52(23):6865-77. PubMed ID: 18029980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Coronal reformations of the chest on 64-row multi-detector row CT: evaluation of image quality in comparison with 16-, 8- and 4-row multi-detector row CT. Nishino M; Kubo T; Kataoka ML; Raptopoulos V; Hatabu H Eur J Radiol; 2006 Aug; 59(2):231-7. PubMed ID: 16567075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A proposed protocol for acceptance and constancy control of computed tomography systems: a Nordic Association for Clinical Physics (NACP) work group report. Kuttner S; Bujila R; Kortesniemi M; Andersson H; Kull L; Østerås BH; Thygesen J; Tarp IS Acta Radiol; 2013 Mar; 54(2):188-98. PubMed ID: 23160544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Quality control of CT systems by automated monitoring of key performance indicators: a two-year study. Nowik P; Bujila R; Poludniowski G; Fransson A J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 16(4):254–265. PubMed ID: 26219012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]