These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16437786)

  • 1. X marks the spot while Casey strikes out: two controversial abortion decisions.
    Zenkich S
    Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 1993; 23(3):1001-40. PubMed ID: 16437786
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Abortion, precedent, and the Constitution: a comment on Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey.
    Maltz EM
    Notre Dame Law Rev; 1992; 68(1):11-32. PubMed ID: 11656531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The right of privacy and restraints on abortion under the "undue burden" test: a jurisprudential comparison of Planned Parenthood v. Casey with European practice and Italian law.
    Ross CS
    Indiana Int Comp Law Rev; 1993; 3():199-231. PubMed ID: 12091926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Abortion rights after South Dakota.
    McDonagh E
    Free Inq; 2006; 26(4):34-8. PubMed ID: 16830439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. What happens if Roe is overruled? Extraterritorial regulation of abortion by the states.
    Bradford CS
    Ariz Law Rev; 1993; 35(1):87-171. PubMed ID: 12645556
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Constitutionalizing Roe, Casey and Carhart: a legislative due-process anti-discrimination principle that gives constitutional content to the "undue burden" standard of review applied to abortion control legislation.
    Van Detta JA
    South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 2001; 10(2):211-92. PubMed ID: 16485363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Why the government is not required to subsidize abortion counseling and referral.
    Hirt TC
    Harv Law Rev; 1988 Jun; 101():1895-915. PubMed ID: 11655923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. National health care legislation and the funding of abortion.
    Mahoney HM
    America (NY); 1993 Oct; 169(11):8-9. PubMed ID: 11659793
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. From arguments to Supreme Court opinions in Planned Parenthood v. Casey.
    Kassop N
    PS (Wash DC); 1993 Mar; 26(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 12085874
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Review of abortion policy: legality, medicaid funding, and parental involvement, 1967-1994.
    Merz JF; Jackson CA; Klerman JA
    Womens Rights Law Report; 1995; 17(1):1-61. PubMed ID: 11863033
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Committee to Defend Reproductive Rights v. Myers: Medi-Cal funding of abortion.
    Hendrickson E
    Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 1978; 9(2):361-419. PubMed ID: 11664072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Court and abortion: worse than you think.
    Dworkin R
    New York Rev Books; 2007 May; 54(9):20-1. PubMed ID: 17517997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Abortion 1990s: contemporary issues and the activist court.
    Bertz RC
    West State Univ Law Rev; 1992; 19(2):393-429. PubMed ID: 16047452
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Partial-truth abortion bans.
    Kaminer W
    Free Inq; 2006; 26(4):17-8. PubMed ID: 16830438
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Air Force women's access to abortion services and the erosion of 10 U.S.C., section 1093.
    Wilde ML
    William Mary J Women Law; 2003; 9(3):351-412. PubMed ID: 15977327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Winter count: taking stock of abortion rights after Casey and Carhart.
    Borgmann CE
    Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar; 31(3):675-716. PubMed ID: 16700116
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Abortion and birth control--right to abortion and regulation thereof: the United States Supreme Court invalidates a statute banning partial birth abortions: Stenberg v. Carhart, 530 U.S. 914 (2000).
    Joersz M
    N D Law Rev; 2001; 77(2):345-73. PubMed ID: 12956123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing the viability of a substantive due process right to in vitro fertilization.
    Harv Law Rev; 2005 Jun; 118(8):2792-813. PubMed ID: 15988862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. So-called "partial birth abortion" bans: bad medicine? Maybe. Bad law? Definitely!
    Massie AM
    Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1998; 59(2):301-80. PubMed ID: 11902179
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. New York v. Sullivan: shhh ... don't say the "a" word! Another outcome-oriented abortion decision.
    Kendall CC
    John Marshall Law Rev; 1990; 23(4):753-70. PubMed ID: 16622962
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.