These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16437811)

  • 1. Government as God: an update on federal intervention in the treatment of critically ill newborns.
    Fine DK
    New Engl Law Rev; 2000; 34(2):343-62. PubMed ID: 16437811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Forgoing treatment of critically ill newborns and the legal legacy of Baby Doe.
    Nelson LJ
    Clin Ethics Rep; 1992; 6(2):1-6. PubMed ID: 11652072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Disabled newborns and the federal child abuse amendments: tenuous protection.
    Smith SR
    Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):765-825. PubMed ID: 11655856
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Treatment of seriously ill and handicapped newborns.
    Fost N
    Crit Care Clin; 1986 Jan; 2(1):145-59. PubMed ID: 11644122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Born to live or born to die: the handicapped newborn in New Jersey.
    Sarno JJ
    Seton Hall Legis J; 1987; 11(1):201-22. PubMed ID: 11651899
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. "New" rights for handicapped newborns: Baby Doe and beyond.
    Phillips CA
    Calif West Law Rev; 1985; 22(1):127-58. PubMed ID: 11658804
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Infant care review committees: an effective approach to the Baby Doe dilemma?
    Shapiro RS; Barthel R
    Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):827-62. PubMed ID: 11655857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The legislative response to Infant Doe.
    Kuzma AL
    Indiana Law J; 1983-1984; 59(3):377-416. PubMed ID: 11658614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Treatment dilemmas for imperiled newborns: why quality of life counts.
    Rhoden NK
    South Calif Law Rev; 1985 Sep; 58(6):1283-347. PubMed ID: 11660412
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Baby Doe's new guardians: federal policy brings nontreatment decisions out of hiding.
    Born MA
    KY Law J; 1986-1987; 75(3):659-75. PubMed ID: 11651897
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In re K.I.: an urgent need for a uniform system in the treatment of the critically ill infant--recognizing the sanctity of life of the child.
    Guevara AL
    Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 2001; 36(1):237-60. PubMed ID: 16523587
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The decision to forgo life-sustaining treatment for seriously ill newborns.
    Strain JE
    Pediatrics; 1983 Oct; 72(4):572-3. PubMed ID: 6889074
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Of diagnoses and discrimination: discriminatory nontreatment of infants with HIV infection.
    Crossley MA
    Columbia Law Rev; 1993 Nov; 93(7):1581-667. PubMed ID: 11659791
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Medical decision-making for defective infants by the Federal government.
    Taub S
    Conn Med; 1983 Jul; 47(7):413-6. PubMed ID: 6224633
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Beyond state intervention in the family: for Baby Jane Doe.
    Minow M
    Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1985; 18(4):933-1014. PubMed ID: 11655183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What ever happened to Baby Jane...Doe?
    Jolly CM
    West State Univ Law Rev; 1987; 14(2):543-9. PubMed ID: 11651891
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ethical dilemmas in the treatment of critically ill newborns.
    Brooks BF
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1985; 1(1):133-41. PubMed ID: 10280374
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Should imperfect infants survive? The 'Baby Doe' regs.
    Baer S
    Natl Rev; 1983 Sep; 35(17):1069, 1092-3. PubMed ID: 16440474
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Withdrawal of life-support in the newborn: whose baby is it?
    Clark FI
    Southwest Univ Law Rev; 1993; 23(1):1-46. PubMed ID: 11659817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Establishing decision making standards for medical treatment to protect the civil rights of handicapped newborns.
    Glasow SB
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1986; 2():255-74. PubMed ID: 10317803
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.