These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16437821)

  • 1. Cultural feminism: it sounds good, but will it work? Application to a husband's interest in his wife's abortion decision.
    Brunner SD
    Univ Dayton Law Rev; 1996; 22(1):101-23. PubMed ID: 16437821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A husband's consent to his wife's abortion.
    Rozovsky LE
    Dimens Health Serv; 1980 Jan; 57(1):34-6. PubMed ID: 7353739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The husband's rights in abortion.
    Etzioni A
    Trial; 1976 Nov; 12(11):56-8. PubMed ID: 11664680
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Constitutional law--abortion--court focuses on husband's interest regarding spousal notification requirement to procure abortion: Scheinberg v. Smith, 659 F.2d 746 (5th Cir. 1981).
    Adams C
    Cumberland Law Rev; 1982-1983; 13(1):143-59. PubMed ID: 11658434
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The fragility of the US Supreme Court decision Roe v. Wade].
    Merchant J
    Med Sci (Paris); 2006; 22(8-9):773-5. PubMed ID: 16962056
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Marital secrets. The emerging issue of abortion spousal notification laws.
    Shore BD
    J Leg Med; 1982 Sep; 3(3):461-82. PubMed ID: 6983551
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Winter count: taking stock of abortion rights after Casey and Carhart.
    Borgmann CE
    Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar; 31(3):675-716. PubMed ID: 16700116
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Abortion 1990s: contemporary issues and the activist court.
    Bertz RC
    West State Univ Law Rev; 1992; 19(2):393-429. PubMed ID: 16047452
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. New York v. Sullivan: shhh ... don't say the "a" word! Another outcome-oriented abortion decision.
    Kendall CC
    John Marshall Law Rev; 1990; 23(4):753-70. PubMed ID: 16622962
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. doe v. Doe: the wife's right to an abortion over her husband's objections.
    Forman HM
    New Engl Law Rev; 1975; 11(1):205-24. PubMed ID: 11664560
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What's good for the goose is good for the gander: toward recognition of men's reproductive rights.
    Totz MA
    North Ill Univ Law Rev; 1994; 15(1):141-236. PubMed ID: 11660320
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Roe v. Wade: what rights the biological father?
    Georgius EH
    Hastings Constit Law Q; 1974; 1(1):251-72. PubMed ID: 11664368
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Equality theory and reproductive freedom.
    Colker R
    Tex J Women Law; 1994; 3(1):99-122. PubMed ID: 12645608
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The right to privacy: Roe v. Wade revisited.
    Smith PA
    Jurist; 1983; 43(2):289-317. PubMed ID: 16086474
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Webster amicus curiae briefs: perspectives on the abortion controversy and the role of the Supreme Court. Conclusion: the future of abortion as a "private choice".
    Grant ER
    Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):233-43. PubMed ID: 2603867
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The development of the undue burden standard in Stenberg v. Carhart: will proposed RU-486 legislation survive?
    Guenther H
    Indiana Law Rev; 2002; 35(3):1021-44. PubMed ID: 16211757
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Morgentaler v. The Queen in the Supreme Court of Canada.
    Martin SL
    Can J Women Law; 1987-1988; 2(2):422-31. PubMed ID: 17076040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Supreme Court and abortion rights.
    Annas GJ
    N Engl J Med; 2007 May; 356(21):2201-7. PubMed ID: 17476003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Choosing substantive justice: a discussion of "choice," "rights" and the new reproductive technologies.
    Cherry AL
    Wis Womens Law J; 1997; 11(3):431-41. PubMed ID: 16281338
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Domestic violence: does the African context demand a different approach?
    Bowman CG
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2003; 26(5):473-91. PubMed ID: 14522221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.