These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1643824)

  • 1. E-Test symposium.
    Thornsberry C
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1992 Jul; 15(5):457-8. PubMed ID: 1643824
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Editorial: symposium on antimicrobial resistance in bacteria from animals.
    Gyles CL
    Anim Health Res Rev; 2008 Dec; 9(2):111-3. PubMed ID: 19102786
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Methods of determination and characteristics of sensitivity (resistance) of bacteria to disinfectants].
    Gudkova EI; Krasil'nikov AP
    Klin Lab Diagn; 1994; (6):48-50. PubMed ID: 7894915
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Automated microbial sensitivity tests noting the difference in bacterial growth profiles--determination of the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of bacteria contaminated by drug-resistant mutant strains].
    Miike H; Ebina Y; Hashimoto H; Miyaji T
    Iyodenshi To Seitai Kogaku; 1983 Apr; 21(2):100-5. PubMed ID: 6655991
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The activity of metronidazole against facultatively anaerobic bacteria.
    Ingham HR; Hall CJ; Sisson PR; Tharagonnet D; Selkon JB
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 1980 May; 6(3):343-7. PubMed ID: 7400068
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of subinhibitory concentrations of antibiotics on the emergence of drug resistant bacteria in vitro.
    Grassi GG; Ferrara A; Navone A; Sala P
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 1980 Mar; 6(2):217-23. PubMed ID: 7380767
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of substrate limitation and growth phase on sensitivity to antimicrobial agents.
    Brown MR; Williams P
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 1985 Jan; 15 Suppl A():7-14. PubMed ID: 3980338
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tetrazolium salts for MIC determination in microplates: why? Which salt to select? How?
    Grare M; Fontanay S; Cornil C; Finance C; Duval RE
    J Microbiol Methods; 2008 Sep; 75(1):156-9. PubMed ID: 18556078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Cefoperazone--activity in vitro].
    Hejzlar M; Silarová J; Pellar T; Kittnar E; Hájková L; Janatová E; Stastná L; Kotasová M; Puchmayerová M
    Cesk Epidemiol Mikrobiol Imunol; 1983 Mar; 32(2):82-6. PubMed ID: 6220824
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ceftazidime: summary of the first international symposium.
    Young LS
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 1981 Sep; 8 Suppl B():349-52. PubMed ID: 19803013
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cefoperazone sodium: proceedings of the first international symposium, Boston, October, 1979.
    Clin Ther; 1980; 3(Spec Issue):1-208. PubMed ID: 6446382
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lysis, induced by cefoxitin sodium, of Gram-negative bacteria containing various R-factors.
    Russell AD; Tottle PC; Chapman DG
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 1978 Jul; 4(B):33-40. PubMed ID: 308501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Characterization of the postantibiotic effect.
    Ebert SC
    Clin Pharm; 1992 Oct; 11(10):876-7. PubMed ID: 1341994
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Postantibiotic effect in vitro.
    Fuursted K
    APMIS Suppl; 1999; 90():1-23. PubMed ID: 10189835
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Temperature elevation, bacterial growth and antibiotic activity.
    Manzella JP; Roberts NJ; Robertson RG; Hoder GB
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 1980 Nov; 6(6):795-8. PubMed ID: 7440470
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Electrical impedance method for bacteriological study of drug sensitivity test].
    Wang H; Pang X; Wang A
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2010 Aug; 27(4):916-9. PubMed ID: 20842871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Anaerobic bacteria as pathogens and co-pathogens in multiple clinical cases. Study of the in vitro sensitivity to 8 antibiotics in samples isolated from patients at the Hospital das Clínicas].
    Ulson CM; Kirchner EE; Hutzler RU; Sinto SI; Vasconcelos RF; Rodrigues E; Peixoto S; Salvatore CA
    Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo; 1979; 21(4 Suppl 3):1-8. PubMed ID: 538397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vitro evaluation of Ly 163892, a new oral cephalosporin.
    Schäfer V; Knothe H; Sammann A; Heidron F
    J Chemother; 1989 Jul; 1(4 Suppl):123-4. PubMed ID: 16312333
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The antimicrobial activity of modern mouthwashes.
    Grenby TH; Saldanha MG
    Br Dent J; 1984 Oct; 157(7):239-42. PubMed ID: 6593089
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of factors affecting the 'critical population' density of inocula on the determination of bacterial susceptibility to antibiotics by disc diffusion methods.
    Hedges AJ
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 1999 Feb; 43(2):313. PubMed ID: 11252343
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.