These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16438942)

  • 1. Sensory suppression during shifts of attention between surfaces in transparent motion.
    Rodríguez V; Valdés-Sosa M
    Brain Res; 2006 Feb; 1072(1):110-8. PubMed ID: 16438942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Exogenous attentional selection of transparent superimposed surfaces modulates early event-related potentials.
    Khoe W; Mitchell JF; Reynolds JH; Hillyard SA
    Vision Res; 2005 Nov; 45(24):3004-14. PubMed ID: 16153678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automatic detection of motion direction changes in the human brain.
    Pazo-Alvarez P; Amenedo E; Cadaveira F
    Eur J Neurosci; 2004 Apr; 19(7):1978-86. PubMed ID: 15078572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neuroelectric correlates of auditory attentional blink.
    Shen D; Alain C
    Psychophysiology; 2010 Jan; 47(1):184-91. PubMed ID: 19818049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attention to surfaces modulates motion processing in extrastriate area MT.
    Wannig A; Rodríguez V; Freiwald WA
    Neuron; 2007 May; 54(4):639-51. PubMed ID: 17521575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attention modulates responses to motion reversals in human visual cortex.
    Tata MS; Mason AL; Sutherland RJ
    Neuroreport; 2007 Aug; 18(13):1361-5. PubMed ID: 17762713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attentional Blink to emotional and threatening pictures in spider phobics: electrophysiology and behavior.
    Trippe RH; Hewig J; Heydel C; Hecht H; Miltner WH
    Brain Res; 2007 May; 1148():149-60. PubMed ID: 17367765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Two-object attentional interference depends on attentional set.
    López M; Rodríguez V; Valdés-Sosa M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2004 Jul; 53(2):127-34. PubMed ID: 15210290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. N200-speller using motion-onset visual response.
    Hong B; Guo F; Liu T; Gao X; Gao S
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Sep; 120(9):1658-66. PubMed ID: 19640783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intramodal and crossmodal processing delays in the attentional blink paradigm revealed by event-related potentials.
    Ptito A; Arnell K; Jolicoeur P; Macleod J
    Psychophysiology; 2008 Sep; 45(5):794-803. PubMed ID: 18627533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Motion direction tuning in human visual cortex.
    Mercier M; Schwartz S; Michel CM; Blanke O
    Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Jan; 29(2):424-34. PubMed ID: 19200244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Differentiating spatial and object-based effects on attention: an event-related brain potential study with peripheral cueing.
    He X; Humphreys G; Fan S; Chen L; Han S
    Brain Res; 2008 Dec; 1245():116-25. PubMed ID: 18955038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of attention on the illusory capture of motion in bimodal stimuli.
    Oruc I; Sinnett S; Bischof WF; Soto-Faraco S; Lock K; Kingstone A
    Brain Res; 2008 Nov; 1242():200-8. PubMed ID: 18514172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. P3 latency shifts in the attentional blink: further evidence for second target processing postponement.
    Sessa P; Luria R; Verleger R; Dell'Acqua R
    Brain Res; 2007 Mar; 1137(1):131-9. PubMed ID: 17258178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Vertical asymmetries in pre-attentive detection of changes in motion direction.
    Amenedo E; Pazo-Alvarez P; Cadaveira F
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 May; 64(2):184-9. PubMed ID: 17343941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Microsaccade directions do not predict directionality of illusory brightness changes of overlapping transparent surfaces.
    Tse PU; Caplovitz GP; Hsieh PJ
    Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(22):3823-30. PubMed ID: 16934310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Suppression of EEG gamma activity may cause the attentional blink.
    Fell J; Klaver P; Elger CE; Fernández G
    Conscious Cogn; 2002 Mar; 11(1):114-22. PubMed ID: 11883991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electrophysiological evidence for temporal dissociation between spatial attention and sensory competition during human face processing.
    Jacques C; Rossion B
    Cereb Cortex; 2007 May; 17(5):1055-65. PubMed ID: 16772314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Processing 3D form and 3D motion: respective contributions of attention-based and stimulus-driven activity.
    Paradis AL; Droulez J; Cornilleau-Pérès V; Poline JB
    Neuroimage; 2008 Dec; 43(4):736-47. PubMed ID: 18805496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Responses to direction and transparent motion stimuli in area FST of the macaque.
    Rosenberg A; Wallisch P; Bradley DC
    Vis Neurosci; 2008; 25(2):187-95. PubMed ID: 18442441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.