These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16439242)

  • 1. Three-dimensional in vivo motion of adult hind foot bones.
    Mattingly B; Talwalkar V; Tylkowski C; Stevens DB; Hardy PA; Pienkowski D
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(4):726-33. PubMed ID: 16439242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A MR imaging procedure to measure tarsal bone rotations.
    Wolf P; Luechinger R; Boesiger P; Stuessi E; Stacoff A
    J Biomech Eng; 2007 Dec; 129(6):931-36. PubMed ID: 18067399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantification of the 3D relative movement of external marker sets vs. bones based on magnetic resonance imaging.
    Sangeux M; Marin F; Charleux F; Dürselen L; Ho Ba Tho MC
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Nov; 21(9):984-91. PubMed ID: 16844273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An in vivo analysis of the motion of the peri-talar joint complex based on MR imaging.
    Stindel E; Udupa JK; Hirsch BE; Odhner D
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2001 Feb; 48(2):236-47. PubMed ID: 11296880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Correlation between anatomic foot and ankle movement measured with MRI and with a motion analysis system.
    Marquez-Barrientos C; Liu XC; Lyon R; Tassone C; Thometz J; Tarima S
    Gait Posture; 2012 Jul; 36(3):389-93. PubMed ID: 22542241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vivo three-dimensional analysis of hindfoot kinematics.
    Imai K; Tokunaga D; Takatori R; Ikoma K; Maki M; Ohkawa H; Ogura A; Tsuji Y; Inoue N; Kubo T
    Foot Ankle Int; 2009 Nov; 30(11):1094-100. PubMed ID: 19912721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Foot bone kinematics as measured in a cadaveric robotic gait simulator.
    Whittaker EC; Aubin PM; Ledoux WR
    Gait Posture; 2011 Apr; 33(4):645-50. PubMed ID: 21458991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Six DOF in vivo kinematics of the ankle joint complex: Application of a combined dual-orthogonal fluoroscopic and magnetic resonance imaging technique.
    de Asla RJ; Wan L; Rubash HE; Li G
    J Orthop Res; 2006 May; 24(5):1019-27. PubMed ID: 16609963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The instantaneous axis of rotation (IAOR) of the foot and ankle: a self-determining system with implications for rehabilitation medicine application.
    Demarais DM; Bachschmidt RA; Harris GF
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2002 Dec; 10(4):232-8. PubMed ID: 12611361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of talus deformity by three-dimensional MRI in congenital clubfoot.
    Itohara T; Sugamoto K; Shimizu N; Ohno I; Tanaka H; Nakajima Y; Sato Y; Yoshikawa H
    Eur J Radiol; 2005 Jan; 53(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 15607856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Asymmetry of the active nonweightbearing foot and ankle range of motion for dorsiflexion-plantar flexion and its coupled movements in adults.
    Ferrario VF; Turci M; Lovecchio N; Shirai YF; Sforza C
    Clin Anat; 2007 Oct; 20(7):834-42. PubMed ID: 17584864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Torsion-transmitting properties of the hind foot.
    Olerud C; Rosendahl Y
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1987 Jan; (214):285-94. PubMed ID: 3791754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Passive motion characteristics of the talocrural and the subtalar joint by dual Euler angles.
    Wong Y; Kim W; Ying N
    J Biomech; 2005 Dec; 38(12):2480-5. PubMed ID: 16214496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mechanics of the ankle and subtalar joints revealed through a 3D quasi-static stress MRI technique.
    Siegler S; Udupa JK; Ringleb SI; Imhauser CW; Hirsch BE; Odhner D; Saha PK; Okereke E; Roach N
    J Biomech; 2005 Mar; 38(3):567-78. PubMed ID: 15652556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computational modeling to predict mechanical function of joints: application to the lower leg with simulation of two cadaver studies.
    Liacouras PC; Wayne JS
    J Biomech Eng; 2007 Dec; 129(6):811-17. PubMed ID: 18067384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of volume sub-sampling on motion estimation of joints via MR imaging.
    Sekaran D
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2009 Apr; 33(3):242-6. PubMed ID: 19201162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Right to left differences in the ankle joint complex range of motion.
    Stefanyshyn DJ; Engsberg JR
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1994 May; 26(5):551-5. PubMed ID: 8007801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vitro analysis of muscle activity illustrates mediolateral decoupling of hind and mid foot bone motion.
    Burg J; Peeters K; Natsakis T; Dereymaeker G; Vander Sloten J; Jonkers I
    Gait Posture; 2013 May; 38(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 23159677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vitro assessment of a motion-based optimization method for locating the talocrural and subtalar joint axes.
    Lewis GS; Sommer HJ; Piazza SJ
    J Biomech Eng; 2006 Aug; 128(4):596-603. PubMed ID: 16813451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bone stress injuries of the ankle and foot: an 86-month magnetic resonance imaging-based study of physically active young adults.
    Niva MH; Sormaala MJ; Kiuru MJ; Haataja R; Ahovuo JA; Pihlajamaki HK
    Am J Sports Med; 2007 Apr; 35(4):643-9. PubMed ID: 17099238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.