128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16441261)
21. Estimation and tests of haplotype-environment interaction when linkage phase is ambiguous.
Lake SL; Lyon H; Tantisira K; Silverman EK; Weiss ST; Laird NM; Schaid DJ
Hum Hered; 2003; 55(1):56-65. PubMed ID: 12890927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Covariance Between Genotypic Effects and its Use for Genomic Inference in Half-Sib Families.
Wittenburg D; Teuscher F; Klosa J; Reinsch N
G3 (Bethesda); 2016 Sep; 6(9):2761-72. PubMed ID: 27402363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Efficiency and power in genetic association studies.
de Bakker PI; Yelensky R; Pe'er I; Gabriel SB; Daly MJ; Altshuler D
Nat Genet; 2005 Nov; 37(11):1217-23. PubMed ID: 16244653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Power of linkage versus association analysis of quantitative traits, by use of variance-components models, for sibship data.
Sham PC; Cherny SS; Purcell S; Hewitt JK
Am J Hum Genet; 2000 May; 66(5):1616-30. PubMed ID: 10762547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Quantifying the amount of missing information in genetic association studies.
Nicolae DL
Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Dec; 30(8):703-17. PubMed ID: 16986163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Genomic breeding value estimation using genetic markers, inferred ancestral haplotypes, and the genomic relationship matrix.
de Roos AP; Schrooten C; Druet T
J Dairy Sci; 2011 Sep; 94(9):4708-14. PubMed ID: 21854945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The importance of haplotype length and heritability using genomic selection in dairy cattle.
Villumsen TM; Janss L; Lund MS
J Anim Breed Genet; 2009 Feb; 126(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 19207924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Haplotype-based methods for detecting uncommon causal variants with common SNPs.
Lin WY; Yi N; Zhi D; Zhang K; Gao G; Tiwari HK; Liu N
Genet Epidemiol; 2012 Sep; 36(6):572-82. PubMed ID: 22706849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The application of the entropy-based statistic for genomic association study of QTL.
Xiang Y; Li Y; Liu Z; Sun Z
J Genet Genomics; 2008 Mar; 35(3):183-8. PubMed ID: 18355762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. SNP subset selection for genetic association studies.
Byng MC; Whittaker JC; Cuthbert AP; Mathew CG; Lewis CM
Ann Hum Genet; 2003 Nov; 67(Pt 6):543-56. PubMed ID: 14641242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Prioritized subset analysis: improving power in genome-wide association studies.
Li C; Li M; Lange EM; Watanabe RM
Hum Hered; 2008; 65(3):129-41. PubMed ID: 17934316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of multimarker logistic regression models, with application to a genomewide scan of schizophrenia.
Wason JM; Dudbridge F
BMC Genet; 2010 Sep; 11():80. PubMed ID: 20828390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. SNPs, haplotypes, and model selection in a candidate gene region: the SIMPle analysis for multilocus data.
Conti DV; Gauderman WJ
Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Dec; 27(4):429-41. PubMed ID: 15543635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Statistically efficient association analysis of quantitative traits with haplotypes and untyped SNPs in family studies.
Diao G; Lin DY
BMC Genet; 2020 Sep; 21(1):99. PubMed ID: 32894040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Transmission/disequilibrium tests for extended marker haplotypes.
Clayton D; Jones H
Am J Hum Genet; 1999 Oct; 65(4):1161-9. PubMed ID: 10486335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. DNA polymorphisms and haplotype patterns of transcription factors involved in barley endosperm development are associated with key agronomic traits.
Haseneyer G; Stracke S; Piepho HP; Sauer S; Geiger HH; Graner A
BMC Plant Biol; 2010 Jan; 10():5. PubMed ID: 20064201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A multiparental cross population for mapping QTL for agronomic traits in durum wheat (Triticum turgidum ssp. durum).
Milner SG; Maccaferri M; Huang BE; Mantovani P; Massi A; Frascaroli E; Tuberosa R; Salvi S
Plant Biotechnol J; 2016 Feb; 14(2):735-48. PubMed ID: 26132599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Performance of random forest when SNPs are in linkage disequilibrium.
Meng YA; Yu Y; Cupples LA; Farrer LA; Lunetta KL
BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 Mar; 10():78. PubMed ID: 19265542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Joint modeling of linkage and association: identifying SNPs responsible for a linkage signal.
Li M; Boehnke M; Abecasis GR
Am J Hum Genet; 2005 Jun; 76(6):934-49. PubMed ID: 15877278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. On the power to detect SNP/phenotype association in candidate quantitative trait loci genomic regions: a simulation study.
Comeron JM; Kreitman M; De La Vega FM
Pac Symp Biocomput; 2003; ():478-89. PubMed ID: 12603051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
