BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16441706)

  • 41. Evaluation of agreement between conventional and liquid-based cytology in cervical cancer early detection based on analysis of 2,091 smears: experience at the Brazilian National Cancer Institute.
    Girianelli VR; Santos Thuler LC
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Sep; 35(9):545-9. PubMed ID: 17703446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Cervical cytology screening in HIV-positive women: do samples from genitourinary medicine departments have high inadequacy rates?
    Sundaram SS; Vijeratnam D; Patel R; Samraj S
    Int J STD AIDS; 2012 Mar; 23(3):227. PubMed ID: 22581887
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Cost-effectiveness of adding human papilloma virus testing to a managed care cervical cancer screening program.
    Lonky NM; Hunter MI; Sadeghi M; Edwards G; Bajamundi K; Monk BJ
    J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2007 Oct; 11(4):258-64. PubMed ID: 17917570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Cervical cancer screening in the 21st century: is it time to retire the PAP smear?
    Wright TC
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jun; 50(2):313-23. PubMed ID: 17513921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Cervical cancer screening among women in metropolitan areas of the United States by individual-level and area-based measures of socioeconomic status, 2000 to 2002.
    Coughlin SS; King J; Richards TB; Ekwueme DU
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2006 Nov; 15(11):2154-9. PubMed ID: 17119040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Cervical smears. Contribution of automated screening].
    Ziol M; Vacher-Lavenu MC
    Ann Pathol; 1996 Nov; 16(5):351-5. PubMed ID: 9004722
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Comparison of conventional Papanicolaou smear and SurePath liquid-based cytology in the Copenhagen population screening programme for cervical cancer.
    Kirschner B; Simonsen K; Junge J
    Cytopathology; 2006 Aug; 17(4):187-94. PubMed ID: 16879266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Medicare expands preventive screening benefits.
    Moore KJ
    Fam Pract Manag; 2001 Jun; 8(6):16. PubMed ID: 11547392
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Finance issue brief: mandated benefits: cervical cancer screening coverage requirements: year end report-2003.
    Plaza CI
    Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2003 Dec; ():1-4. PubMed ID: 14969245
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. ACOG Practice Bulletin no. 109: Cervical cytology screening.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Dec; 114(6):1409-1420. PubMed ID: 20134296
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Sailing under wrong colors; false-negative results of cervix cytology].
    Lammes FB
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1979 Oct; 123(43):1857-9. PubMed ID: 390407
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Cervical screening in older women.
    Ogilvie D
    Cytopathology; 2002 Oct; 13(5):333. PubMed ID: 12421452
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Liquid-based versus conventional cervical cytology.
    Boon ME
    Lancet; 2006 May; 367(9521):1482; author reply 1482-3. PubMed ID: 16679153
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Liquid-based cytology: is this the way forward for cervical screening?
    Moseley RP; Paget S
    Cytopathology; 2002 Apr; 13(2):71-82. PubMed ID: 11952745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Medical screening: to be or not to be?
    Wang WZ; Tang JL
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2010 Jul; 123(14):1948-51. PubMed ID: 20819584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. ["Cost-effectiveness" of cervical screening].
    Kostova P
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2007; 46(6):32-4. PubMed ID: 17974169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Management of women with abnormal cervical cytology: treatment patterns and associated costs in England and Wales.
    Martin-Hirsch P; Rash B; Martin A; Standaert B
    BJOG; 2007 Apr; 114(4):408-15. PubMed ID: 17378815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Can we change the way we screen?: the ThinPrep Imaging System.
    Dawson AE
    Cancer; 2004 Dec; 102(6):340-4. PubMed ID: 15540250
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [A reply on cervix cancer screening: cervical cytological test doesn't fulfil the requirements of a good screening test].
    Bistoletti P
    Lakartidningen; 2000 Sep; 97(37):4042. PubMed ID: 11036367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Is cervical screening necessary in older women?
    Cruickshank ME
    Cytopathology; 2001 Dec; 12(6):351-3. PubMed ID: 11843936
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.