These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
300 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16442210)
1. Laparoscopic and robotic assisted radical prostatectomy--critical analysis of the results. Rassweiler J; Hruza M; Teber D; Su LM Eur Urol; 2006 Apr; 49(4):612-24. PubMed ID: 16442210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Oncological and functional results of open, robot-assisted and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: does surgical approach and surgical experience matter? Herrmann TR; Rabenalt R; Stolzenburg JU; Liatsikos EN; Imkamp F; Tezval H; Gross AJ; Jonas U; Burchardt M World J Urol; 2007 Apr; 25(2):149-60. PubMed ID: 17354014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Radical prostatectomy: a comparison of open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic techniques. Hegarty NJ; Kaouk JH Can J Urol; 2006 Feb; 13 Suppl 1():56-61. PubMed ID: 16526984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a critical analysis of surgical quality. Touijer K; Guillonneau B Eur Urol; 2006 Apr; 49(4):625-32. PubMed ID: 16488072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Bolenz C; Gupta A; Hotze T; Ho R; Cadeddu JA; Roehrborn CG; Lotan Y Eur Urol; 2010 Mar; 57(3):453-8. PubMed ID: 19931979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The addition of robotic surgery to an established laparoscopic radical prostatectomy program: effect on positive surgical margins. Trabulsi EJ; Linden RA; Gomella LG; McGinnis DE; Strup SE; Lallas CD Can J Urol; 2008 Apr; 15(2):3994-9. PubMed ID: 18405448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy. Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Open, laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy: optimizing the surgical approach. Bivalacqua TJ; Pierorazio PM; Su LM Surg Oncol; 2009 Sep; 18(3):233-41. PubMed ID: 19286370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of 90-day re-admission rates between open retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP), laparoscopic RP (LRP) and robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP). Chung SD; Kelle JJ; Huang CY; Chen YH; Lin HC BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt C):E966-71. PubMed ID: 22540425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A direct comparison of robotic assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single institution experience. Rozet F; Jaffe J; Braud G; Harmon J; Cathelineau X; Barret E; Vallancien G J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):478-82. PubMed ID: 17561160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: contemporary comparison with open surgery. Romero-Otero J; Touijer K; Guillonneau B Urol Oncol; 2007; 25(6):499-504. PubMed ID: 18047960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of operative and functional outcomes of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and radical retropubic prostatectomy: single surgeon experience. Ghavamian R; Knoll A; Boczko J; Melman A Urology; 2006 Jun; 67(6):1241-6. PubMed ID: 16678887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robotic prostatectomy: a pooled analysis of published literature. El-Hakim A; Leung RA; Tewari A Expert Rev Anticancer Ther; 2006 Jan; 6(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 16375639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of length of hospital stay between radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Nelson B; Kaufman M; Broughton G; Cookson MS; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Baumgartner RG; Smith JA J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):929-31. PubMed ID: 17296378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Oncologic and functional outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy]. Drouin SJ; Vaessen C; Misraï V; Ferhi K; Bitker MO; Chartier-Kastler E; Haertig A; Richard F; Rouprêt M Prog Urol; 2009 Mar; 19(3):158-64. PubMed ID: 19268252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Financial comparative analysis of minimally invasive surgery to open surgery for localized prostate cancer: a single-institution experience. Mouraviev V; Nosnik I; Sun L; Robertson CN; Walther P; Albala D; Moul JW; Polascik TJ Urology; 2007 Feb; 69(2):311-4. PubMed ID: 17320670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prospective evaluation of short-term impact and recovery of health related quality of life in men undergoing robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus open radical prostatectomy. Miller J; Smith A; Kouba E; Wallen E; Pruthi RS J Urol; 2007 Sep; 178(3 Pt 1):854-8; discussion 859. PubMed ID: 17631338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of radical prostatectomy techniques: open, laparoscopic and robotic assisted. Frota R; Turna B; Barros R; Gill IS Int Braz J Urol; 2008; 34(3):259-68; discussion 268-9. PubMed ID: 18601755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robotics, telesurgery and telementoring--their position in modern urological laparoscopy. Rassweiler J; Frede T Arch Esp Urol; 2002; 55(6):610-28. PubMed ID: 12224160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]