These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16442289)

  • 41. QSAR for predicting joint toxicity of halogenated benzenes to Dicrateria zhanjiangensis.
    Zeng M; Lin Z; Yin D; Yin K
    Bull Environ Contam Toxicol; 2008 Dec; 81(6):525-30. PubMed ID: 18854906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Robust fuzzy mappings for QSAR studies.
    Kumar M; Thurow K; Stoll N; Stoll R
    Eur J Med Chem; 2007 May; 42(5):675-85. PubMed ID: 17316911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. QSAR modeling of acute toxicity by balance of correlations.
    Toropov AA; Rasulev BF; Leszczynski J
    Bioorg Med Chem; 2008 Jun; 16(11):5999-6008. PubMed ID: 18482841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Rapid toxicity prediction of organic chemicals to Chlorella vulgaris using quantitative structure-activity relationships methods.
    Xia B; Liu K; Gong Z; Zheng B; Zhang X; Fan B
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2009 Mar; 72(3):787-94. PubMed ID: 18950860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Quantitative structure-property relationships for pesticides in biopartitioning micellar chromatography.
    Ma W; Luan F; Zhang H; Zhang X; Liu M; Hu Z; Fan B
    J Chromatogr A; 2006 Apr; 1113(1-2):140-7. PubMed ID: 16490199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Comparison of in vitro and in vivo acute fish toxicity in relation to toxicant mode of action.
    Knauer K; Lampert C; Gonzalez-Valero J
    Chemosphere; 2007 Jul; 68(8):1435-41. PubMed ID: 17512969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Assessing how well a modeling protocol captures a structure-activity landscape.
    Guha R; Van Drie JH
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Aug; 48(8):1716-28. PubMed ID: 18686944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Comparison of MC4PC and MDL-QSAR rodent carcinogenicity predictions and the enhancement of predictive performance by combining QSAR models.
    Contrera JF; Kruhlak NL; Matthews EJ; Benz RD
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2007 Dec; 49(3):172-82. PubMed ID: 17703860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Robust cross-validation of linear regression QSAR models.
    Konovalov DA; Llewellyn LE; Vander Heyden Y; Coomans D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Oct; 48(10):2081-94. PubMed ID: 18826208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Fragment-based quantitative structure-activity relationship (FB-QSAR) for fragment-based drug design.
    Du QS; Huang RB; Wei YT; Pang ZW; Du LQ; Chou KC
    J Comput Chem; 2009 Jan; 30(2):295-304. PubMed ID: 18613071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Use of quantitative structural analysis to predict fish bioconcentration factors for pesticides.
    Jackson SH; Cowan-Ellsberry CE; Thomas G
    J Agric Food Chem; 2009 Feb; 57(3):958-67. PubMed ID: 19138085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A computational model for the prediction of aqueous solubility that includes crystal packing, intrinsic solubility, and ionization effects.
    Johnson SR; Chen XQ; Murphy D; Gudmundsson O
    Mol Pharm; 2007; 4(4):513-23. PubMed ID: 17539661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. 3D QSAR selectivity analyses of carbonic anhydrase inhibitors: insights for the design of isozyme selective inhibitors.
    Weber A; Böhm M; Supuran CT; Scozzafava A; Sotriffer CA; Klebe G
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(6):2737-60. PubMed ID: 17125213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. SAMFA: simplifying molecular description for 3D-QSAR.
    Manchester J; Czermiński R
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Jun; 48(6):1167-73. PubMed ID: 18503264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. CAUTION: popular "benchmark" data sets do not distinguish the merits of 3D QSAR methods.
    Manchester J; Czermiński R
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jun; 49(6):1449-54. PubMed ID: 19438212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Molecule kernels: a descriptor- and alignment-free quantitative structure-activity relationship approach.
    Mohr JA; Jain BJ; Obermayer K
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Sep; 48(9):1868-81. PubMed ID: 18767832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Training similarity measures for specific activities: application to reduced graphs.
    Birchall K; Gillet VJ; Harper G; Pickett SD
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(2):577-86. PubMed ID: 16562986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A comprehensive model for reproductive and developmental toxicity hazard identification: I. Development of a weight of evidence QSAR database.
    Matthews EJ; Kruhlak NL; Daniel Benz R; Contrera JF
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2007 Mar; 47(2):115-35. PubMed ID: 17207562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Quantitative structure activity relationship (QSAR) for toxicity of chlorophenols on L929 cells in vitro.
    Liu X; Chen J; Yu H; Zhao J; Giesy JP; Wang X
    Chemosphere; 2006 Sep; 64(10):1619-26. PubMed ID: 16790261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Neural networks in building QSAR models.
    Baskin II; Palyulin VA; Zefirov NS
    Methods Mol Biol; 2008; 458():137-58. PubMed ID: 19065809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.