These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16442517)

  • 1. Feature binding in visual working memory evaluated by type identification paradigm.
    Saiki J; Miyatsuji H
    Cognition; 2007 Jan; 102(1):49-83. PubMed ID: 16442517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multiple-object permanence tracking: limitation in maintenance and transformation of perceptual objects.
    Saiki J
    Prog Brain Res; 2002; 140():133-48. PubMed ID: 12508587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimated capacity of object files in visual short-term memory is not improved by retrieval cueing.
    Saiki J; Miyatsuji H
    J Vis; 2009 Mar; 9(3):16.1-15. PubMed ID: 19757955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Selective attention to specific features within objects: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
    Nobre AC; Rao A; Chelazzi L
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Apr; 18(4):539-61. PubMed ID: 16768359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spatiotemporal characteristics of dynamic feature binding in visual working memory.
    Saiki J
    Vision Res; 2003 Sep; 43(20):2107-23. PubMed ID: 12855247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attention and perceptual implicit memory: effects of selective versus divided attention and number of visual objects.
    Mulligan NW
    Psychol Res; 2002 Aug; 66(3):157-65. PubMed ID: 12192444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Feature-based memory-driven attentional capture: visual working memory content affects visual attention.
    Olivers CN; Meijer F; Theeuwes J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Oct; 32(5):1243-65. PubMed ID: 17002535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Binding feature dimensions in visual short-term memory.
    Poom L; Olsson H
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 May; 131(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 19375056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions.
    Luck SJ; Vogel EK
    Nature; 1997 Nov; 390(6657):279-81. PubMed ID: 9384378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A memory span of one? Object identification in 6.5-month-old infants.
    Káldy Z; Leslie AM
    Cognition; 2005 Sep; 97(2):153-77. PubMed ID: 16226561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What do we learn from binding features? Evidence for multilevel feature integration.
    Colzato LS; Raffone A; Hommel B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Jun; 32(3):705-16. PubMed ID: 16822133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Distinct capacity limits for attention and working memory: Evidence from attentive tracking and visual working memory paradigms.
    Fougnie D; Marois R
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Jun; 17(6):526-34. PubMed ID: 16771804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Scene and position specificity in visual memory for objects.
    Hollingworth A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):58-69. PubMed ID: 16478340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Remembered but unused: the accessory items in working memory that do not guide attention.
    Peters JC; Goebel R; Roelfsema PR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 21(6):1081-91. PubMed ID: 18702589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A temporal same-object advantage in the tunnel effect: facilitated change detection for persisting objects.
    Flombaum JI; Scholl BJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):840-53. PubMed ID: 16846283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robust color-shape binding representations for multiple objects in visual working memory.
    Saiki J
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 May; 148(5):905-925. PubMed ID: 30676044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Temporal limitations in the effective binding of attended target attributes in the mutual masking of visual objects.
    Hommuk K; Bachmann T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun; 35(3):648-60. PubMed ID: 19485683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Neurophysiological evidence for the time course of activation of global shape, part, and local contour representations during visual object categorization and memory.
    Schendan HE; Kutas M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 May; 19(5):734-49. PubMed ID: 17488201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Selective visual attention ensures constancy of sensory representations: testing the influence of perceptual load and spatial competition.
    Wegener D; Galashan FO; Markowski DN; Kreiter AK
    Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(21):3563-74. PubMed ID: 16879852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is motion extrapolation employed in multiple object tracking? Tracking as a low-level, non-predictive function.
    Keane BP; Pylyshyn ZW
    Cogn Psychol; 2006 Jun; 52(4):346-68. PubMed ID: 16442088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.