These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16442829)

  • 1. Influence of recording instrumentation on the stimulus artifact tail in the surface acquisition of somatosensory evoked potentials.
    Hamming N; Lovely DF
    Med Eng Phys; 2007 Jan; 29(1):148-53. PubMed ID: 16442829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Factors affecting the stimulus artifact tail in surface-recorded somatosensory-evoked potentials.
    Hua Y; Lovely DF; Doraiswami R
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2006 Mar; 44(3):226-41. PubMed ID: 16937164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Differences between primary somatosensory cortex- and vertex-derived somatosensory-evoked potentials in the rat.
    Stienen PJ; van den Brom WE; de Groot HN; Venker-van Haagen AJ; Hellebrekers LJ
    Brain Res; 2004 Dec; 1030(2):256-66. PubMed ID: 15571674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Band-tunable and multiplexed integrated circuits for simultaneous recording and stimulation with microelectrode arrays.
    Olsson RH; Buhl DL; Sirota AM; Buzsaki G; Wise KD
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Jul; 52(7):1303-11. PubMed ID: 16041994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ultrahigh-frequency EEG during fMRI: pushing the limits of imaging-artifact correction.
    Freyer F; Becker R; Anami K; Curio G; Villringer A; Ritter P
    Neuroimage; 2009 Oct; 48(1):94-108. PubMed ID: 19539035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The impact of stimulus properties on low- and high-frequency median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials.
    Gobbelé R; Dieckhöfer A; Thyerlei D; Buchner H; Waberski TD
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Aug; 25(4):194-201. PubMed ID: 18677183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. SEP-induced activity and its thermographic cortical representation in a murine model.
    Hoffmann KP; Ruff R; Kirsch M
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2013 Jun; 58(3):217-23. PubMed ID: 23740653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reduction of stimulus artifact in somatosensory evoked potentials: segmented versus subthreshold training.
    Boudreau BH; Englehart KB; Chan AD; Parker PA
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Jul; 51(7):1187-95. PubMed ID: 15248535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. TMS-EEG co-registration: on TMS-induced artifact.
    Veniero D; Bortoletto M; Miniussi C
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Jul; 120(7):1392-9. PubMed ID: 19535291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adaptive stimulus artifact reduction in noncortical somatosensory evoked potential studies.
    Parsa V; Parker PA; Scott RN
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1998 Feb; 45(2):165-79. PubMed ID: 9473840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stimulation artifact in surface EMG signal: effect of the stimulation waveform, detection system, and current amplitude using hybrid stimulation technique.
    Mandrile F; Farina D; Pozzo M; Merletti R
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2003 Dec; 11(4):407-15. PubMed ID: 14960117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of methods for eliciting somatosensory-evoked potentials in the awake, freely moving rat.
    Stienen PJ; Haberham ZL; van den Brom WE; de Groot HN; Venker-Van Haagen AJ; Hellebrekers LJ
    J Neurosci Methods; 2003 Jun; 126(1):79-90. PubMed ID: 12788504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does combing the scalp reduce scalp electrode impedances?
    Mahajan Y; McArthur G
    J Neurosci Methods; 2010 May; 188(2):287-9. PubMed ID: 20211649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Changes in the electroencephalogram and evoked potentials while using a special form of psychological training (meditation)].
    Liubimov NN
    Fiziol Cheloveka; 1999; 25(2):56-66. PubMed ID: 10500354
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Vertex-recorded, rather than primary somatosensory cortex-recorded, somatosensory-evoked potentials signal unpleasantness of noxious stimuli in the rat.
    Stienen PJ; van Oostrom H; van den Bos R; de Groot HN; Hellebrekers LJ
    Brain Res Bull; 2006 Jul; 70(3):203-12. PubMed ID: 16861104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Unmasking of presynaptic and postsynaptic high-frequency oscillations in epidural cervical somatosensory evoked potentials during voluntary movement.
    Insola A; Padua L; Mazzone P; Valeriani M
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Jan; 119(1):237-45. PubMed ID: 18054280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Generators and temporal succession of giant somatosensory evoked potentials in cortical reflex myoclonus: epicortical recording from sensorimotor cortex.
    Hitomi T; Ikeda A; Matsumoto R; Kinoshita M; Taki J; Usui K; Mikuni N; Nagamine T; Hashimoto N; Shibasaki H; Takahashi R
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Jul; 117(7):1481-6. PubMed ID: 16759904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nociception-related somatosensory evoked potentials in awake dogs recorded after intra epidermal electrical stimulation.
    van Oostrom H; Stienen PJ; Doornenbal A; Hellebrekers LJ
    Eur J Pain; 2009 Feb; 13(2):154-60. PubMed ID: 18486507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evoked potential instrumentation, methodology and theory.
    Nuwer MR
    Bull Los Angeles Neurol Soc; 1982; 47():1-12. PubMed ID: 7183360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Identification and characterization of somatosensory off responses.
    Spackman L; Boyd S; Towell T
    Brain Res; 2006 Oct; 1114(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 16952337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.