BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

478 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16445334)

  • 1. Reliability and validity of arm volume measurements for assessment of lymphedema.
    Taylor R; Jayasinghe UW; Koelmeyer L; Ung O; Boyages J
    Phys Ther; 2006 Feb; 86(2):205-14. PubMed ID: 16445334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliability and limits of agreement of circumferential, water displacement, and optoelectronic volumetry in the measurement of upper limb lymphedema.
    Deltombe T; Jamart J; Recloux S; Legrand C; Vandenbroeck N; Theys S; Hanson P
    Lymphology; 2007 Mar; 40(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 17539462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Upper-extremity volume measurements in women with lymphedema: a comparison of measurements obtained via water displacement with geometrically determined volume.
    Sander AP; Hajer NM; Hemenway K; Miller AC
    Phys Ther; 2002 Dec; 82(12):1201-12. PubMed ID: 12444879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validity for the simplified water displacement instrument to measure arm lymphedema as a result of breast cancer surgery.
    Sagen A; Kåresen R; Skaane P; Risberg MA
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2009 May; 90(5):803-9. PubMed ID: 19406300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validation of the inverse water volumetry method: A new gold standard for arm volume measurements.
    Damstra RJ; Glazenburg EJ; Hop WC
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2006 Oct; 99(3):267-73. PubMed ID: 16752072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measurement of upper extremity volume in women after axillary dissection for breast cancer.
    Megens AM; Harris SR; Kim-Sing C; McKenzie DC
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2001 Dec; 82(12):1639-44. PubMed ID: 11733875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Concurrent validity of upper-extremity volume estimates: comparison of calculated volume derived from girth measurements and water displacement volume.
    Karges JR; Mark BE; Stikeleather SJ; Worrell TW
    Phys Ther; 2003 Feb; 83(2):134-45. PubMed ID: 12564949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validity and intra- and interobserver reliability of an indirect volume measurements in patients with upper extremity lymphedema.
    Meijer RS; Rietman JS; Geertzen JH; Bosmans JC; Dijkstra PU
    Lymphology; 2004 Sep; 37(3):127-33. PubMed ID: 15560108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of breast cancer-related arm lymphedema--comparison of physical measurement methods and self-report.
    Czerniec SA; Ward LC; Refshauge KM; Beith J; Lee MJ; York S; Kilbreath SL
    Cancer Invest; 2010 Jan; 28(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 19916749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of volume displacement versus circumferential arm measurements for lymphoedema: implications for the SNAC trial.
    Tewari N; Gill PG; Bochner MA; Kollias J
    ANZ J Surg; 2008 Oct; 78(10):889-93. PubMed ID: 18959643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of upper limb volume measurement techniques and arm symptoms between healthy volunteers and individuals with known lymphedema.
    Ridner SH; Montgomery LD; Hepworth JT; Stewart BR; Armer JM
    Lymphology; 2007 Mar; 40(1):35-46. PubMed ID: 17539463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predictors of lymphedema in patients with breast cancer undergoing axillary lymph node dissection in Hong Kong.
    Mak SS; Yeo W; Lee YM; Mo KF; Tse KY; Tse SM; Ho FP; Kwan WH
    Nurs Res; 2008; 57(6):416-25. PubMed ID: 19018216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Arm and shoulder morbidity in breast cancer patients after breast-conserving therapy versus mastectomy.
    Nesvold IL; Dahl AA; Løkkevik E; Marit Mengshoel A; Fosså SD
    Acta Oncol; 2008; 47(5):835-42. PubMed ID: 18568481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Lymphedema following axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer.
    Sakorafas GH; Peros G; Cataliotti L; Vlastos G
    Surg Oncol; 2006 Nov; 15(3):153-65. PubMed ID: 17187979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Case-control study to evaluate predictors of lymphedema after breast cancer surgery.
    Swenson KK; Nissen MJ; Leach JW; Post-White J
    Oncol Nurs Forum; 2009 Mar; 36(2):185-93. PubMed ID: 19273407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measurement of limb volume: laser scanning versus volume displacement.
    McKinnon JG; Wong V; Temple WJ; Galbraith C; Ferry P; Clynch GS; Clynch C
    J Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 96(5):381-8. PubMed ID: 17477361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Defining lower limb lymphedema after inguinal or ilio-inguinal dissection in patients with melanoma using classification and regression tree analysis.
    Spillane AJ; Saw RP; Tucker M; Byth K; Thompson JF
    Ann Surg; 2008 Aug; 248(2):286-93. PubMed ID: 18650640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validity and reliability of three-dimensional imaging for measuring the volume of the arm.
    Erends M; van der Aa T; de Grzymala AP; van der Hulst R
    Lymphat Res Biol; 2014 Dec; 12(4):275-81. PubMed ID: 25495383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measurement decisions for clinical assessment of limb volume changes in patients with bilateral and unilateral limb edema.
    Mayrovitz HN; Macdonald J; Davey S; Olson K; Washington E
    Phys Ther; 2007 Oct; 87(10):1362-8. PubMed ID: 17684090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lymphedema in women with breast cancer: characteristics of patients screened for a randomized trial.
    Dayes IS; Levine MN; Julian JA; Pritchard KI; D'Souza DP; Kligman L; Reise D; Wiernikowski JA; Bonilla L; Whelan TJ
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2008 Jul; 110(2):337-42. PubMed ID: 17851756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.