These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1644547)
81. Quantification of pulsatile flow in MRI by an analysis of T2 changes in ECG-gated multiecho experiments. Mueller E; Deimling M; Reinhardt ER Magn Reson Med; 1986 Apr; 3(2):331-5. PubMed ID: 3713498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
82. The performance of the ultrasonic flowmeter in complex velocity profiles. Gessner U IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1969 Apr; 16(2):139-42. PubMed ID: 5804080 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
83. Maximum frequency follower for the processing of ultrasonic Doppler shift signals. Skidmore R; Follett DH Ultrasound Med Biol; 1978; 4(2):145-7. PubMed ID: 734794 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
84. Measurement of ultrasound velocity in human tissue. Van Venroolj GE Ultrasonics; 1971 Oct; 9(4):240-2. PubMed ID: 5114348 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
85. On the optimal temporal resolution for phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: establishment of baseline values. Santini F; Pansini M; Hrabak-Paar M; Yates D; Langenickel TH; Bremerich J; Bieri O; Schubert T J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2020 Oct; 22(1):72. PubMed ID: 33012283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
86. Comparison of blood velocity measurements between ultrasound Doppler and accelerated phase-contrast MR angiography in small arteries with disturbed flow. Jiang J; Strother C; Johnson K; Baker S; Consigny D; Wieben O; Zagzebski J Phys Med Biol; 2011 Mar; 56(6):1755-73. PubMed ID: 21346280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
87. Measurement of aortic blood flow with MR imaging: comparative study with Doppler US. Matsuda T; Shimizu K; Sakurai T; Fujita A; Ohara H; Okamura S; Hashimoto S; Tamaki S; Kawai C Radiology; 1987 Mar; 162(3):857-61. PubMed ID: 3544040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
88. Human abdominal aorta: comparative measurements of blood flow with MR imaging and multigated Doppler US. Maier SE; Meier D; Boesiger P; Moser UT; Vieli A Radiology; 1989 May; 171(2):487-92. PubMed ID: 2649924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
89. Velocity profiles in the normal human abdominal aorta: a comparison between ultrasound and magnetic resonance data. Vieli A; Moser U; Maier S; Meier D; Boesiger P Ultrasound Med Biol; 1989; 15(2):113-9. PubMed ID: 2658233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
90. A comparative study of velocity measurements in major blood vessels using magnetic resonance imaging and Doppler ultrasound. Zananiri FV; Jackson PC; Halliwell M; Harris RA; Hayward JK; Davies ER; Wells PN Br J Radiol; 1993 Dec; 66(792):1128-33. PubMed ID: 8293257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
91. Magnetic resonance velocity measurements in small arteries. Comparison with Doppler ultrasonic measurements in the aortas of normal rabbits. Wendt RE; Rokey R; Wong WF; Marks A Invest Radiol; 1992 Jul; 27(7):499-503. PubMed ID: 1644547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
92. The Doppler signal: where does it come from and what does it mean? Nelson TR; Pretorius DH AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Sep; 151(3):439-47. PubMed ID: 2970215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]