569 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16445889)
1. Cortical expressions of inhibition of return.
Prime DJ; Ward LM
Brain Res; 2006 Feb; 1072(1):161-74. PubMed ID: 16445889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Inhibition of return from stimulus to response.
Prime DJ; Ward LM
Psychol Sci; 2004 Apr; 15(4):272-6. PubMed ID: 15043647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Orienting of spatial attention in Huntington's Disease.
Couette M; Bachoud-Levi AC; Brugieres P; Sieroff E; Bartolomeo P
Neuropsychologia; 2008 Apr; 46(5):1391-400. PubMed ID: 18242648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of endogenous and exogenous attention on visual processing: an Inhibition of Return study.
Chica AB; Lupiáñez J
Brain Res; 2009 Jun; 1278():75-85. PubMed ID: 19374885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Neural correlates of spatial and non-spatial inhibition of return (IOR) in attentional orienting.
Zhou X; Chen Q
Neuropsychologia; 2008 Sep; 46(11):2766-75. PubMed ID: 18597795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Neural processes of attentional inhibition of return traced with magnetoencephalography.
Ayabe T; Ishizu T; Kojima S; Urakawa T; Nishitani N; Kaneoke Y; Kakigi R
Neuroscience; 2008 Oct; 156(3):769-80. PubMed ID: 18762232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Different effects of exogenous cues in a visual detection and discrimination task: delayed attention withdrawal and/or speeded motor inhibition?
Van der Lubbe RH; Vogel RO; Postma A
J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Dec; 17(12):1829-40. PubMed ID: 16356322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Attention and sensory gain control: a peripheral visual process?
Handy TC; Khoe W
J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Dec; 17(12):1936-49. PubMed ID: 16356330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Isolating event-related potential components associated with voluntary control of visuo-spatial attention.
McDonald JJ; Green JJ
Brain Res; 2008 Aug; 1227():96-109. PubMed ID: 18621037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Saccade trajectory deviations and inhibition-of-return: Measuring the amount of attentional processing.
Theeuwes J; Van der Stigchel S
Vision Res; 2009 Jun; 49(10):1307-15. PubMed ID: 18723045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An event-related fMRI study of exogenous orienting: supporting evidence for the cortical basis of inhibition of return?
Mayer AR; Seidenberg M; Dorflinger JM; Rao SM
J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Sep; 16(7):1262-71. PubMed ID: 15453978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Distinct neural correlates for resolving stroop conflict at inhibited and noninhibited locations in inhibition of return.
Chen Q; Wei P; Zhou X
J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Nov; 18(11):1937-46. PubMed ID: 17069483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Electrophysiological explorations of the cause and effect of inhibition of return in a cue-target paradigm.
Tian Y; Klein RM; Satel J; Xu P; Yao D
Brain Topogr; 2011 Jun; 24(2):164-82. PubMed ID: 21365310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. On the relationship between occipital cortex activity and inhibition of return.
Prime DJ; Jolicoeur P
Psychophysiology; 2009 Nov; 46(6):1278-87. PubMed ID: 19572908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Visuospatial attention shifts by gaze and arrow cues: an ERP study.
Hietanen JK; Leppänen JM; Nummenmaa L; Astikainen P
Brain Res; 2008 Jun; 1215():123-36. PubMed ID: 18485332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of endogenous and exogenous orientations of attention on inhibition of return in a cross-modal target-target aiming task.
Lyons J; Glazebrook CM; Keetch KM; Dhillon VP; Elliott D
J Mot Behav; 2006 May; 38(3):219-28. PubMed ID: 16709561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The footprints of visual attention during search with 100% valid and 100% invalid cues.
Eckstein MP; Pham BT; Shimozaki SS
Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1193-207. PubMed ID: 15066385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Inhibition of return arises from inhibition of response processes: an analysis of oscillatory beta activity.
Pastötter B; Hanslmayr S; Bäuml KH
J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Jan; 20(1):65-75. PubMed ID: 17919085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does Joe influence Fred's action? Inhibition of return across different nervous systems.
Welsh TN; Elliott D; Anson JG; Dhillon V; Weeks DJ; Lyons JL; Chua R
Neurosci Lett; 2005 Sep; 385(2):99-104. PubMed ID: 15927370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Two components in IOR: evidence for response bias and perceptual processing delays using the SAT methodology.
Zhao Y; Heinke D; Ivanoff J; Klein RM; Humphreys GW
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2143-59. PubMed ID: 21789695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
