These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1056 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16446563)

  • 1. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test.
    Cameron S; Dillon H; Newall P
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development of the Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences Test (LISN-S).
    Cameron S; Dillon H
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):196-211. PubMed ID: 17496671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The listening in spatialized noise-sentences test (LISN-S): test-retest reliability study.
    Cameron S; Dillon H
    Int J Audiol; 2007 Mar; 46(3):145-53. PubMed ID: 17365068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Speech-in-speech listening on the LiSN-S test by older adults with good audiograms depends on cognition and hearing acuity at high frequencies.
    Besser J; Festen JM; Goverts ST; Kramer SE; Pichora-Fuller MK
    Ear Hear; 2015 Jan; 36(1):24-41. PubMed ID: 25207850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The listening in Spatialized Noise test: normative data for children.
    Cameron S; Dillon H; Newall P
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Feb; 45(2):99-108. PubMed ID: 16566248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The listening in spatialized noise-sentences test (LISN-S): comparison to the prototype LISN and results from children with either a suspected (central) auditory processing disorder or a confirmed language disorder.
    Cameron S; Dillon H
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 May; 19(5):377-91. PubMed ID: 19253811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Understanding speech in noise after correction of congenital unilateral aural atresia: effects of age in the emergence of binaural squelch but not in use of head-shadow.
    Gray L; Kesser B; Cole E
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Sep; 73(9):1281-7. PubMed ID: 19581007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Horizontal-plane localization of noise and speech signals by postlingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants.
    Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Ricketts TA; Labadie RF; Haynes DS
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):524-41. PubMed ID: 17609614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The listening in spatialized noise test: an auditory processing disorder study.
    Cameron S; Dillon H; Newall P
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2006 May; 17(5):306-20. PubMed ID: 16796298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development of the North American Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences test (NA LiSN-S): sentence equivalence, normative data, and test-retest reliability studies.
    Cameron S; Brown D; Keith R; Martin J; Watson C; Dillon H
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2009 Feb; 20(2):128-46. PubMed ID: 19927676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Binaural advantage for younger and older adults with normal hearing.
    Dubno JR; Ahlstrom JB; Horwitz AR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Apr; 51(2):539-56. PubMed ID: 18367695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Auditory evoked potentials in the detection of interaural intensity differences in children and adults.
    Wambacq IJ; Koehnke J; Shea-Miller KJ; Besing J; Toth V; Abubakr A
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):320-31. PubMed ID: 17485981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effects of hearing impairment and aging on spatial processing.
    Glyde H; Cameron S; Dillon H; Hickson L; Seeto M
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 22941406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 20588118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development and evaluation of the LiSN & learn auditory training software for deficit-specific remediation of binaural processing deficits in children: preliminary findings.
    Cameron S; Dillon H
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011; 22(10):678-96. PubMed ID: 22212767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Bernstein JG; Grant KW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3358-72. PubMed ID: 19425676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
    Laske RD; Veraguth D; Dillier N; Binkert A; Holzmann D; Huber AM
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Establishment of age-specific normative data for the canadian French version of the hearing in noise test for children.
    Vaillancourt V; Laroche C; Giguère C; Soli SD
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):453-66. PubMed ID: 18349705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 53.