These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
8. Genetic and economic benefits of selection based on performance recording and genotyping in lower tiers of multi-tiered sheep breeding schemes. Santos BF; van der Werf JH; Gibson JP; Byrne TJ; Amer PR Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Jan; 49(1):10. PubMed ID: 28095776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Genetic associations between stayability and longevity in commercial crossbred sows, and stayability in multiplier sows. Poulsen BG; Nielsen B; Ostersen T; Christensen OF J Anim Sci; 2020 Jun; 98(6):. PubMed ID: 32492122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. National Pork Producers Council Maternal Line National Genetic Evaluation Program: a comparison of sow longevity and trait associations with sow longevity. Serenius T; Stalder KJ; Baas TJ; Mabry JW; Goodwin RN; Johnson RK; Robison OW; Tokach M; Miller RK J Anim Sci; 2006 Sep; 84(9):2590-5. PubMed ID: 16908665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Total cost estimation for implementing genome-enabled selection in a multi-level swine production system. Abell CE; Dekkers JC; Rothschild MF; Mabry JW; Stalder KJ Genet Sel Evol; 2014 May; 46(1):32. PubMed ID: 24885089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Genomewide association analysis of sow lactation performance traits in lines of Yorkshire pigs divergently selected for residual feed intake during grow-finish phase. Thekkoot DM; Young JM; Rothschild MF; Dekkers JC J Anim Sci; 2016 Jun; 94(6):2317-31. PubMed ID: 27285909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of the genetic and economic impact of performance recording and genotyping in Australian commercial sheep operations. Santos BFS; Amer PR; Granleese T; Byrne TJ; Hogan L; Gibson JP; van der Werf JHJ J Anim Breed Genet; 2018 Jun; 135(3):221-237. PubMed ID: 29878494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Culling intervals and culling risks in four stages of the reproductive life of first service and reserviced female pigs in commercial herds. Sasaki Y; Koketsu Y Theriogenology; 2010 Mar; 73(5):587-94. PubMed ID: 20006377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A longitudinal study of weight and fatness in sows from selection to parity five, using random regression. Lewis CR; Bunter KL J Anim Sci; 2013 Oct; 91(10):4598-610. PubMed ID: 23893980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Effect of population size of performance test on short-term selection result of sire line]. Zhang H; Li JQ; Wang C; Liu XH; Chen YS Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 2005 Jul; 32(7):696-703. PubMed ID: 16078737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Correlated responses in sow appetite, residual feed intake, body composition, and reproduction after divergent selection for residual feed intake in the growing pig. Gilbert H; Bidanel JP; Billon Y; Lagant H; Guillouet P; Sellier P; Noblet J; Hermesch S J Anim Sci; 2012 Apr; 90(4):1097-108. PubMed ID: 22100596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost-benefit analysis of aquaculture breeding programs. Janssen K; Saatkamp H; Komen H Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Jan; 50(1):2. PubMed ID: 29378517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Within-farm variability in age structure of breeding-female pigs and reproductive performance on commercial swine breeding farms. Koketsu Y Theriogenology; 2005 Mar; 63(5):1256-65. PubMed ID: 15725434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Culling patterns in selected Minnesota swine breeding herds. D'Allaire S; Stein TE; Leman AD Can J Vet Res; 1987 Oct; 51(4):506-12. PubMed ID: 3453273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]