These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16447377)
1. The time it takes to switch attention. Logan GD Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Aug; 12(4):647-53. PubMed ID: 16447377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Priming cue encoding by manipulating transition frequency in explicitly cued task switching. Schneider DW; Logan GD Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Feb; 13(1):145-51. PubMed ID: 16724782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The impact of multiple irrelevant visual events at the same spatial location on inhibition. Visser TA; Barnes D Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):392-402. PubMed ID: 19304628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Inhibition of return with rapid serial shifts of attention: implications for memory and visual search. Dodd MD; Castel AD; Pratt J Percept Psychophys; 2003 Oct; 65(7):1126-35. PubMed ID: 14674638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. What matters in the cued task-switching paradigm: tasks or cues? Mayr U Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Oct; 13(5):794-9. PubMed ID: 17328375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Short cue presentations encourage advance task preparation: a recipe to diminish the residual switch cost. Verbruggen F; Liefooghe B; Vandierendonck A; Demanet J J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):342-56. PubMed ID: 17352616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The spatial distribution of attention following an exogenous cue. Henderson JM; Macquistan AD Percept Psychophys; 1993 Feb; 53(2):221-30. PubMed ID: 8433920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A demonstration of direct access to colored stimuli following cueing by color. Navon D; Kasten R Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Sep; 138(1):30-8. PubMed ID: 21621179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Importance of precue location in directing attention. Cheal M; Lyon DR Acta Psychol (Amst); 1991 Jun; 76(3):201-11. PubMed ID: 1927574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cue-independent task-specific representations in task switching: evidence from backward inhibition. Altmann EM J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):892-9. PubMed ID: 17723067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Attention and nontarget effects in the location-cuing paradigm. Chastain G; Cheal M; Lyon D Percept Psychophys; 1996 Feb; 58(2):300-9. PubMed ID: 8838172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impaired color word processing at an unattended location: evidence from a Stroop task combined with inhibition of return. Choi JM; Cho YS; Proctor RW Mem Cognit; 2009 Sep; 37(6):935-44. PubMed ID: 19679871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Precuing benefits for color and location in a visual search task. Vierck E; Miller J Percept Psychophys; 2008 Feb; 70(2):365-73. PubMed ID: 18372756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does crossmodal correspondence modulate the facilitatory effect of auditory cues on visual search? Klapetek A; Ngo MK; Spence C Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Aug; 74(6):1154-67. PubMed ID: 22648604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Examining the time course of facilitation and inhibition with simultaneous onset and offset cues. Pratt J; Hirshhorn M Psychol Res; 2003 Nov; 67(4):261-5. PubMed ID: 14634813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Location dominance in attending to color and shape. Tsal Y; Lavie N J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1993 Feb; 19(1):131-9. PubMed ID: 8440981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The footprints of visual attention during search with 100% valid and 100% invalid cues. Eckstein MP; Pham BT; Shimozaki SS Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1193-207. PubMed ID: 15066385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Age-related deficits in guided search using cues. Gottlob LR Psychol Aging; 2006 Sep; 21(3):526-34. PubMed ID: 16953714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is location cueing inherently superior to color cueing? Not if color is presented early enough. Kasten R; Navon D Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jan; 127(1):89-102. PubMed ID: 17420002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Movement versus focusing of visual attention. Shepherd M; Müller HJ Percept Psychophys; 1989 Aug; 46(2):146-54. PubMed ID: 2762102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]