These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

318 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16447380)

  • 1. The role of working memory in attentional capture.
    Lavie N; De Fockert J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Aug; 12(4):669-74. PubMed ID: 16447380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Concurrent working memory load can facilitate selective attention: evidence for specialized load.
    Park S; Kim MS; Chun MM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Oct; 33(5):1062-75. PubMed ID: 17924807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of working memory in auditory selective attention.
    Dalton P; Santangelo V; Spence C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Nov; 62(11):2126-32. PubMed ID: 19557667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. No negative priming without cognitive control.
    de Fockert JW; Mizon GA; D'Ubaldo M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1333-41. PubMed ID: 20854003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Components of working memory and visual selective attention.
    Burnham BR; Sabia M; Langan C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Feb; 40(1):391-403. PubMed ID: 23875574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cognitive load modulates attentional capture by color singletons during effortful visual search.
    Burnham BR
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Sep; 135(1):50-8. PubMed ID: 20510910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interactions Between Modality of Working Memory Load and Perceptual Load in Distractor Processing.
    Koshino H; Olid P
    J Gen Psychol; 2015; 142(3):135-49. PubMed ID: 26273937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of working memory in tactile selective attention.
    Dalton P; Lavie N; Spence C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Apr; 62(4):635-44. PubMed ID: 19096988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Towards a resolution of the attentional-capture debate.
    Carmel T; Lamy D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Dec; 41(6):1772-82. PubMed ID: 26280266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Capture of the gaze does not capture the mind.
    Lange EB; Starzynski C; Engbert R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Aug; 74(6):1168-82. PubMed ID: 22648605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Indirect assessment of visual working memory for simple and complex objects.
    Makovski T; Jiang YV
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Sep; 36(6):1132-43. PubMed ID: 18927031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Temporal attentional capture: effects of irrelevant singletons on rapid serial visual search.
    Dalton P; Lavie N
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Oct; 13(5):881-5. PubMed ID: 17328389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. It's under control: top-down search strategies can override attentional capture.
    Leber AB; Egeth HE
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Feb; 13(1):132-8. PubMed ID: 16724780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Feature-based statistical regularities of distractors modulate attentional capture.
    Stilwell BT; Bahle B; Vecera SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Mar; 45(3):419-433. PubMed ID: 30802131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attentional capture by color without any relevant attentional set.
    Turatto M; Galfano G
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Feb; 63(2):286-97. PubMed ID: 11281103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Distractor filtering in media multitaskers.
    Cain MS; Mitroff SR
    Perception; 2011; 40(10):1183-92. PubMed ID: 22308888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Distractor devaluation requires visual working memory.
    Goolsby BA; Shapiro KL; Raymond JE
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Feb; 16(1):133-8. PubMed ID: 19145023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Automatic selection of irrelevant object features through working memory: evidence for top-down attentional capture.
    Soto D; Humphreys GW
    Exp Psychol; 2009; 56(3):165-72. PubMed ID: 19289358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Absence of attentional capture in parallel search is possible: a failure to replicate attentional capture in a non-singleton target search task.
    Wienrich C; Janczyk M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2044-52. PubMed ID: 21805210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dilution: atheoretical burden or just load? A reply to Tsal and Benoni (2010).
    Lavie N; Torralbo A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1657-64; discussion 1665-8. PubMed ID: 21133554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.