These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16448925)

  • 1. Effects of scintillator on the detective quantum efficiency (DQE) of a digital imaging system.
    Farman TT; Vandre RH; Pajak JC; Miller SR; Lempicki A; Farman AG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Feb; 101(2):219-23. PubMed ID: 16448925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of scintillator on the modulation transfer function (MTF) of a digital imaging system.
    Farman TT; Vandre RH; Pajak JC; Miller SR; Lempicki A; Farman AG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 May; 99(5):608-13. PubMed ID: 15829886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of CsI:Tl and Gd
    Howansky A; Mishchenko A; Lubinsky AR; Zhao W
    Med Phys; 2019 Nov; 46(11):4857-4868. PubMed ID: 31461532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of x-ray detectors for mouse CT imaging.
    Goertzen AL; Nagarkar V; Street RA; Paulus MJ; Boone JM; Cherry SR
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Dec; 49(23):5251-65. PubMed ID: 15656275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measurement of the detective quantum efficiency (DQE) of digital X-ray detectors according to the novel standard IEC 62220-1.
    Illers H; Buhr E; Hoeschen C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):39-44. PubMed ID: 15933079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detective quantum efficiency measured as a function of energy for two full-field digital mammography systems.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 May; 54(9):2845-61. PubMed ID: 19384004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Characterization of a clinical unit for digital radiography based on irradiation side sampling technology.
    Rivetti S; Lanconelli N; Bertolini M; Nitrosi A; Burani A
    Med Phys; 2013 Oct; 40(10):101902. PubMed ID: 24089904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. X-ray imaging performance of structured cesium iodide scintillators.
    Zhao W; Ristic G; Rowlands JA
    Med Phys; 2004 Sep; 31(9):2594-605. PubMed ID: 15487742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Study of a prototype high quantum efficiency thick scintillation crystal video-electronic portal imaging device.
    Samant SS; Gopal A
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2783-91. PubMed ID: 16964854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Signal and noise transfer properties of CMOS based active pixel flat panel imager coupled to structured CsI:Tl.
    Arvanitis CD; Bohndiek SE; Blakesley J; Olivo A; Speller RD
    Med Phys; 2009 Jan; 36(1):116-26. PubMed ID: 19235380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance of a high fill factor, indirect detection prototype flat-panel imager for mammography.
    El-Mohri Y; Antonuk LE; Zhao Q; Wang Y; Li Y; Du H; Sawant A
    Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):315-27. PubMed ID: 17278517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of additive noise on system performance of a digital X-ray imaging system.
    Zhang D; Rong J; Chen WR; Gao F; Xu K; Wu X; Liu H
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Jan; 54(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 17260857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of beam energy and filtration on the signal-to-noise ratio of the Dexis intraoral X-ray detector.
    Kitagawa H; Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jan; 33(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 15140818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An examination of automatic exposure control regimes for two digital radiography systems.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4645-70. PubMed ID: 19590115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Imaging characteristics evaluation of a digital radiography system.
    Moro L; Pannella A; Bassetti C; Fantinato D; Baldi M; Bertoli G
    Radiol Med; 2003; 106(1-2):94-102. PubMed ID: 12951556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison between objective and subjective image quality measurements for a full field digital mammography system.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2441-63. PubMed ID: 16675862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Segmented crystalline scintillators: empirical and theoretical investigation of a high quantum efficiency EPID based on an initial engineering prototype CsI(TI) detector.
    Sawant A; Antonuk LE; El-Mohri Y; Zhao Q; Wang Y; Li Y; Du H; Perna L
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):1053-66. PubMed ID: 16696482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The application of image quality measurements for digital angiography.
    Peterzol A; Padovani R; Quai E; Vano E; Prieto C; Aviles P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):38-43. PubMed ID: 16461533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measurement of the modulation transfer function of digital X-ray detectors with an opaque edge-test device.
    Illers H; Buhr E; Günther-Kohfahl S; Neitzel U
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):214-9. PubMed ID: 15933111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quality control measurements for digital x-ray detectors.
    Marshall NW; Mackenzie A; Honey ID
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Feb; 56(4):979-99. PubMed ID: 21248386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.