274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16449105)
1. Clinical and ultrasound parameters to predict the risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor.
Peregrine E; O'Brien P; Omar R; Jauniaux E
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Feb; 107(2 Pt 1):227-33. PubMed ID: 16449105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women.
Vrouenraets FP; Roumen FJ; Dehing CJ; van den Akker ES; Aarts MJ; Scheve EJ
Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 105(4):690-7. PubMed ID: 15802392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transvaginal ultrasound measurement of cervical length in the supine and upright positions versus Bishop score in predicting successful induction of labor at term.
Meijer-Hoogeveen M; Roos C; Arabin B; Stoutenbeek P; Visser GH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Feb; 33(2):213-20. PubMed ID: 19173229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of models that predict Cesarean section after induction of labor.
Verhoeven CJ; Oudenaarden A; Hermus MA; Porath MM; Oei SG; Mol BW
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Sep; 34(3):316-21. PubMed ID: 19670397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prediction of the risk of cesarean delivery after labor induction in twin gestations based on clinical and ultrasound parameters.
Han BR; Park KH; Lee SY; Jung EY; Park JW
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1125-31. PubMed ID: 27199212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical and sonographic parameters at 37 weeks' gestation for predicting the risk of primary Cesarean delivery in nulliparous women.
Kim SN; Park KH; Jung HJ; Hong JS; Shin DM; Kang WS
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Oct; 36(4):486-92. PubMed ID: 20586108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Preeclampsia: is induction of labor more successful?
Xenakis EM; Piper JM; Field N; Conway D; Langer O
Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Apr; 89(4):600-3. PubMed ID: 9083320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length vs. Bishop score in labor induction at term: tolerability and prediction of Cesarean delivery.
Tan PC; Vallikkannu N; Suguna S; Quek KF; Hassan J
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2007 May; 29(5):568-73. PubMed ID: 17444553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Induction of labor after one prior cesarean: predictors of vaginal delivery.
Grinstead J; Grobman WA
Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Mar; 103(3):534-8. PubMed ID: 14990418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Maternal risk factors for postterm pregnancy and cesarean delivery following labor induction.
Roos N; Sahlin L; Ekman-Ordeberg G; Kieler H; Stephansson O
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010 Aug; 89(8):1003-10. PubMed ID: 20636240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Short stature--an independent risk factor for Cesarean delivery.
Sheiner E; Levy A; Katz M; Mazor M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2005 Jun; 120(2):175-8. PubMed ID: 15925047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The association of maternal weight with cesarean risk, labor duration, and cervical dilation rate during labor induction.
Nuthalapaty FS; Rouse DJ; Owen J
Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Mar; 103(3):452-6. PubMed ID: 14990405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The value of ultrasound in the prediction of successful induction of labor.
Rane SM; Guirgis RR; Higgins B; Nicolaides KH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Oct; 24(5):538-49. PubMed ID: 15386612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Models for the prediction of successful induction of labor based on pre-induction sonographic measurement of cervical length.
Rane SM; Guirgis RR; Higgins B; Nicolaides KH
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2005 May; 17(5):315-22. PubMed ID: 16147844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bishop score and transvaginal ultrasound for preinduction cervical assessment: a randomized clinical trial.
Bartha JL; Romero-Carmona R; Martínez-Del-Fresno P; Comino-Delgado R
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Feb; 25(2):155-9. PubMed ID: 15660437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Birth complications, overweight, and physical inactivity.
Voldner N; Frøslie KF; Haakstad LA; Bø K; Henriksen T
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(5):550-5. PubMed ID: 19277916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Maternal body mass index in the first trimester and risk of cesarean delivery in nulliparous women in spontaneous labor.
Bergholt T; Lim LK; Jørgensen JS; Robson MS
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Feb; 196(2):163.e1-5. PubMed ID: 17306665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The MFMU Cesarean Registry: factors affecting the success of trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery.
Landon MB; Leindecker S; Spong CY; Hauth JC; Bloom S; Varner MW; Moawad AH; Caritis SN; Harper M; Wapner RJ; Sorokin Y; Miodovnik M; Carpenter M; Peaceman AM; O'Sullivan MJ; Sibai BM; Langer O; Thorp JM; Ramin SM; Mercer BM; Gabbe SG;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Sep; 193(3 Pt 2):1016-23. PubMed ID: 16157104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Labor progression and risk of cesarean delivery in electively induced nulliparas.
Vahratian A; Zhang J; Troendle JF; Sciscione AC; Hoffman MK
Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 105(4):698-704. PubMed ID: 15802393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Elective induction vs. spontaneous labor associations and outcomes.
Glantz JC
J Reprod Med; 2005 Apr; 50(4):235-40. PubMed ID: 15916205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]