174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16449958)
1. Measurements of objective and subjective fixation disparity with and without a central fusion stimulus.
Brautaset RL; Jennings JA
Med Sci Monit; 2006 Feb; 12(2):MT1-4. PubMed ID: 16449958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Fixation disparity with the Pola pointing test: not representative for eye position under natural viewing conditions].
Gerling J; Ball M; Bömer T; Bach M; Kommerell G
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1998 Apr; 212(4):226-33. PubMed ID: 9644669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of illumination and foveal fusion lock on clinical fixation disparity measurements with the Sheedy Disparometer.
Wildsoet CF; Cameron KD
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1985; 5(2):171-8. PubMed ID: 4022649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Objective vs subjective measurements of dark vergence.
Jaschinski W; Jainta S; Hoormann J; Walper N
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 Jan; 27(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 17239194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of fixation disparity curve variables measured with the Sheedy Disparometer and the Wesson Fixation Disparity Card.
Goss DA; Patel J
Optom Vis Sci; 1995 Aug; 72(8):580-8. PubMed ID: 8539027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Mallett Fixation Disparity Test: influence of test instructions and relationship with symptoms.
Karania R; Evans BJ
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2006 Sep; 26(5):507-22. PubMed ID: 16918777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of fixation disparity measured by saladin card and disparometer.
Frantz KA; Elston P; Michalik E; Templeman CD; Zoltoski RK
Optom Vis Sci; 2011 Jun; 88(6):E733-41. PubMed ID: 21423065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Objective vs subjective measures of fixation disparity for short and long fixation periods.
Jaschinski W; Jainta S; Kloke WB
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2010 Jul; 30(4):379-90. PubMed ID: 20629960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparisons of commercially available devices for the measurement of fixation disparity and associated phorias.
Brownlee GA; Goss DA
J Am Optom Assoc; 1988 Jun; 59(6):451-60. PubMed ID: 3403890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of fixation disparity measurements obtained with the Wesson Fixation Disparity Card and the Sheedy Disparometer.
Dittemore D; Crum J; Kirschen D
Optom Vis Sci; 1993 May; 70(5):414-20. PubMed ID: 8515972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Can fixation disparity be detected reliably by measurement and correctional techniques according H.J. Haase (MKH)?].
Gerling J; de Paz H; Schroth V; Bach M; Kommerell G
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2000 Jun; 216(6):401-11. PubMed ID: 10919120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of associated heterophoria measurements using the Mallett test for near vision and the Sheedy Disparometer.
Pickwell LD; Gilchrist JM; Hesler J
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1988; 8(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 3419825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fixation disparity analysis: sensory and motor approaches.
London R; Crelier RS
Optometry; 2006 Dec; 77(12):590-608. PubMed ID: 17157241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Subjective fixation disparity affected by dynamic asymmetry, resting vergence, and nonius bias.
Svede A; Hoormann J; Jainta S; Jaschinski W
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Jun; 52(7):4356-61. PubMed ID: 21467184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Objective and subjective measures of vergence step responses.
Jainta S; Hoormann J; Jaschinski W
Vision Res; 2007 Dec; 47(26):3238-46. PubMed ID: 17959213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fixation disparity with a so-called "central" fusion lock.
Kommerell G
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2006 Sep; 26(5):523; author reply 524. PubMed ID: 16918778
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Individual Objective and Subjective Fixation Disparity in Near Vision.
Jaschinski W
PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0170190. PubMed ID: 28135308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of fixation disparities obtained by objective and subjective methods.
Fogt N; Jones R
Vision Res; 1998 Feb; 38(3):411-21. PubMed ID: 9536364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the presence of a central fusion lock effect on fixation disparity curve parameters in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects.
Mirzaeian M; Hashemi H; Narooie-Noori F; Nabovati P; Yekta A; Sardari S; Ostadimoghaddam H; Doostdar A; Khabazkhoob M
Clin Exp Optom; 2021 Jul; 104(5):617-624. PubMed ID: 33751916
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Heterophoria and fixation disparity: a review.
Kommerell G; Gerling J; Ball M; de Paz H; Bach M
Strabismus; 2000 Jun; 8(2):127-34. PubMed ID: 10980694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
