622 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16450003)
1. Beautification and fraud.
Nat Cell Biol; 2006 Feb; 8(2):101-2. PubMed ID: 16450003
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Investigation of scientific fraud. Statements from the Swedish Research Council not sufficiently normative].
Werkö L
Lakartidningen; 2006 Oct 25-31; 103(43):3288-91. PubMed ID: 17117661
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Journals should set a new standard in transparency.
Dellavalle RP; Lundahl K; Freeman SR; Schilling LM
Nature; 2007 Jan; 445(7126):364. PubMed ID: 17251958
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [New guidelines on good scientific practice].
Nielsen OH
Ugeskr Laeger; 2009 May; 171(22):1847-9. PubMed ID: 19486614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. On cloning research, peer review and the possibility of fraud.
Carrió I
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2006 Mar; 33(3):235-6. PubMed ID: 16477432
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Science fraud: from patchwork mouse to patchwork data.
Weissmann G
FASEB J; 2006 Apr; 20(6):587-90. PubMed ID: 16581962
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Behind the scenes of scientific articles: defining categories of fraud and regulating cases].
Pontille D; Torny D
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2012 Aug; 60(4):247-53. PubMed ID: 22819062
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Promoting ethical conduct in the publication of research.
Freedman JE
Cardiovasc Ther; 2008; 26(2):89-90. PubMed ID: 18485131
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Doctor admits Lancet study is fiction.
Marris E
Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7074):248-9. PubMed ID: 16421528
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Publication ethics.
Hays JC
Public Health Nurs; 2009; 26(3):205-6. PubMed ID: 19386055
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Fraud in scientific publishing.
Scully C; Baum B
Oral Dis; 2006 Jul; 12(4):357. PubMed ID: 16792718
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Global trend: more science, more fraud.
Altman L; Broad WJ
N Y Times Web; 2005 Dec; ():F1, F6. PubMed ID: 16450465
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Fraud and misconduct in scientific publications].
Matías-Guiu J; García-Ramos R
Neurologia; 2010; 25(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 20388454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Should journals police scientific fraud?
Marris E
Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7076):520-1. PubMed ID: 16452946
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Authorship and co-authorship].
Haug C
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 Feb; 126(4):429. PubMed ID: 16477275
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Gel slicing and dicing: a recipe for disaster.
Nat Cell Biol; 2004 Apr; 6(4):275. PubMed ID: 15057234
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Scientific misconduct: tip of an iceberg or the elephant in the room?
Luther F
J Dent Res; 2010 Dec; 89(12):1364-7. PubMed ID: 20940367
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Fraud in scientific research: the prosecutor's approach.
Willcox BL
Account Res; 1992; 2(2):139-51. PubMed ID: 16144093
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Peer review and scientific misconduct: bad authors and trusting reviewers.
Malay DS
J Foot Ankle Surg; 2009; 48(3):283-4. PubMed ID: 19423027
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Science comes to terms with the lessons of fraud.
Abbott A
Nature; 1999 Mar; 398(6722):13-7. PubMed ID: 10078516
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
