256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16450213)
1. Acoustic to electric pitch comparisons in cochlear implant subjects with residual hearing.
Boëx C; Baud L; Cosendai G; Sigrist A; Kós MI; Pelizzone M
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2006 Jun; 7(2):110-24. PubMed ID: 16450213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Electric-acoustic pitch comparisons in single-sided-deaf cochlear implant users: frequency-place functions and rate pitch.
Schatzer R; Vermeire K; Visser D; Krenmayr A; Kals M; Voormolen M; Van de Heyning P; Zierhofer C
Hear Res; 2014 Mar; 309():26-35. PubMed ID: 24252455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An electric frequency-to-place map for a cochlear implant patient with hearing in the nonimplanted ear.
Dorman MF; Spahr T; Gifford R; Loiselle L; McKarns S; Holden T; Skinner M; Finley C
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2007 Jun; 8(2):234-40. PubMed ID: 17351713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pitch matching psychometrics in electric acoustic stimulation.
Baumann U; Rader T; Helbig S; Bahmer A
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):656-62. PubMed ID: 21869623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pitch comparisons of acoustically and electrically evoked auditory sensations.
Blamey PJ; Dooley GJ; Parisi ES; Clark GM
Hear Res; 1996 Sep; 99(1-2):139-50. PubMed ID: 8970822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Abnormal pitch perception produced by cochlear implant stimulation.
Zeng FG; Tang Q; Lu T
PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e88662. PubMed ID: 24551131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Neural tonotopy in cochlear implants: an evaluation in unilateral cochlear implant patients with unilateral deafness and tinnitus.
Vermeire K; Nobbe A; Schleich P; Nopp P; Voormolen MH; Van de Heyning PH
Hear Res; 2008 Nov; 245(1-2):98-106. PubMed ID: 18817861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pure-Tone Masking Patterns for Monopolar and Phantom Electrical Stimulation in Cochlear Implants.
Saoji AA; Koka K; Litvak LM; Finley CC
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(1):124-130. PubMed ID: 28700446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Electro-acoustic stimulation. Acoustic and electric pitch comparisons.
McDermott H; Sucher C; Simpson A
Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14 Suppl 1():2-7. PubMed ID: 19390169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pitch and loudness matching of unmodulated and modulated stimuli in cochlear implantees.
Vandali A; Sly D; Cowan R; van Hoesel R
Hear Res; 2013 Aug; 302():32-49. PubMed ID: 23685148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve at high stimulus rates: a physiological and histopathological study.
Xu J; Shepherd RK; Millard RE; Clark GM
Hear Res; 1997 Mar; 105(1-2):1-29. PubMed ID: 9083801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ipsilateral acoustic electric pitch matching: a case study of cochlear implantation in an up-sloping hearing loss with preserved hearing across multiple frequencies.
Prentiss S; Staecker H; Wolford B
Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 May; 15(3):161-5. PubMed ID: 24601768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Perceptual changes with monopolar and phantom electrode stimulation.
Klawitter S; Landsberger DM; Büchner A; Nogueira W
Hear Res; 2018 Mar; 359():64-75. PubMed ID: 29325874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Frequency selectivity of contralateral residual acoustic hearing in bimodal cochlear implant users, and limitations on the ability to match the pitch of electric and acoustic stimuli.
Green T; Faulkner A; Rosen S
Int J Audiol; 2012 May; 51(5):389-98. PubMed ID: 22201528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pitch Matching between Electrical Stimulation of a Cochlear Implant and Acoustic Stimuli Presented to a Contralateral Ear with Residual Hearing.
Tan CT; Martin B; Svirsky MA
J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Mar; 28(3):187-199. PubMed ID: 28277210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Psychoacoustic and electrophysiological electric-acoustic interaction effects in cochlear implant users with ipsilateral residual hearing.
Imsiecke M; Büchner A; Lenarz T; Nogueira W
Hear Res; 2020 Feb; 386():107873. PubMed ID: 31884220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Place-versus-Pitch Mismatch between a Perimodiolar and Lateral Wall Cochlear Implant Electrode Array in Patients with Single-Sided Deafness and a Cochlear Implant.
Peters JPM; Bennink E; van Zanten GA
Audiol Neurootol; 2019; 24(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 30995658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Simultaneous masking between electric and acoustic stimulation in cochlear implant users with residual low-frequency hearing.
Krüger B; Büchner A; Nogueira W
Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():185-196. PubMed ID: 28688755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Temporal Pitch Perception in Cochlear-Implant Users: Channel Independence in Apical Cochlear Regions.
Griessner A; Schatzer R; Steixner V; Rajan GP; Zierhofer C; Távora-Vieira D
Trends Hear; 2021; 25():23312165211020645. PubMed ID: 34041983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Relationship Between Insertion Angles, Default Frequency Allocations, and Spiral Ganglion Place Pitch in Cochlear Implants.
Landsberger DM; Svrakic M; Roland JT; Svirsky M
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(5):e207-13. PubMed ID: 25860624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
