323 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16450712)
1. Influence of milking technique and lactation on the bovine teat by means of ultrasonographic examination.
Khol JL; Franz S; Klein D; Lexer D; Waiblinger S; Luger K; Baumgartner W
Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2006; 119(1-2):68-73. PubMed ID: 16450712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Recovery of cow teats after milking as determined by ultrasonographic scanning.
Neijenhuis F; Klungel GH; Hogeveen H
J Dairy Sci; 2001 Dec; 84(12):2599-606. PubMed ID: 11814016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Teat anatomy and its relationship with quarter and udder milk flow characteristics in dairy cows.
Weiss D; Weinfurtner M; Bruckmaier RM
J Dairy Sci; 2004 Oct; 87(10):3280-9. PubMed ID: 15377607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Machine milking-induced changes in teat canal dimensions as assessed by ultrasonography.
Melvin JM; Heuwieser W; Virkler PD; Nydam DV; Wieland M
J Dairy Sci; 2019 Mar; 102(3):2657-2669. PubMed ID: 30639026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ultrasonographic measurement of the bovine teat: breed differences, and the significance of the measurements for udder health.
Klein D; Flöck M; Khol JL; Franz S; Stüger HP; Baumgartner W
J Dairy Res; 2005 Aug; 72(3):296-302. PubMed ID: 16174360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of inner teat morphology by using high-resolution ultrasound: Changes due to milking and establishment of measurement traits of the distal teat canal.
Martin LM; Stöcker C; Sauerwein H; Büscher W; Müller U
J Dairy Sci; 2018 Sep; 101(9):8417-8428. PubMed ID: 29935835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing teat canal morphology in the dry period and during lactation by high-resolution ultrasound.
Berteau M; Pepler PT; Broadhurst A; Hammond G; Zadoks RN; Viora L
J Dairy Res; 2024 Feb; 91(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 38494752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Milk flow-dependent vacuum loss in high-line milking systems: effects on milking characteristics and teat tissue condition.
Ambord S; Bruckmaier RM
J Dairy Sci; 2010 Aug; 93(8):3588-94. PubMed ID: 20655427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of pulsationless milking on teat canal keratin and mastitis.
Capuco AV; Mein GA; Nickerson SC; Jack LJ; Wood DL; Bright SA; Aschenbrenner RA; Miller RH; Bitman J
J Dairy Sci; 1994 Jan; 77(1):64-74. PubMed ID: 7509817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Teat tissue reactions to milking: effects of vacuum level.
Hamann J; Mein GA; Wetzel S
J Dairy Sci; 1993 Apr; 76(4):1040-6. PubMed ID: 8486836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Milk-flow data collected routinely in an automatic milking system: an alternative to milking-time testing in the management of teat-end condition?
Nørstebø H; Rachah A; Dalen G; Rønningen O; Whist AC; Reksen O
Acta Vet Scand; 2018 Jan; 60(1):2. PubMed ID: 29325588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Infrared thermography and ultrasonography to indirectly monitor the influence of liner type and overmilking on teat tissue recovery.
Paulrud CO; Clausen S; Andersen PE; Rasmussen MD
Acta Vet Scand; 2005; 46(3):137-47. PubMed ID: 16261926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A longitudinal prospective cohort study investigating the association of premilking stimulation and teat-end shape on milking characteristics and teat tissue condition in dairy cows.
Wieland M; Melvin JM; Nydam DV; Virkler PD
BMC Vet Res; 2019 Feb; 15(1):58. PubMed ID: 30755196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of automatic cluster remover settings on production, udder health, and milking duration.
Jago JG; Burke JL; Williamson JH
J Dairy Sci; 2010 Jun; 93(6):2541-9. PubMed ID: 20494162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of a latency period between pre-stimulation and teat cup attachment and periodic vacuum reduction on milking characteristics and teat condition in dairy cows.
Vetter A; van Dorland HA; Youssef M; Bruckmaier RM
J Dairy Res; 2014 Feb; 81(1):107-12. PubMed ID: 24433587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An observational study investigating the association of ultrasonographically assessed machine milking-induced changes in teat condition and teat-end shape in dairy cows.
Wieland M; Virkler PD; Borkowski AH; Älveby N; Wood P; Nydam DV
Animal; 2019 Feb; 13(2):341-348. PubMed ID: 29925442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Short communication: Teat wall diameter and teat tissue thickness in dairy cows are affected by intramammary pressure and by the mechanical forces of machine milking.
Odorcic M; Blau U; Löfstrand J; Bruckmaier RM
J Dairy Sci; 2020 Jan; 103(1):884-889. PubMed ID: 31733859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. How does the milk removal method affect teat tissue and teat recovery in dairy ewes?
Alejandro M; Roca A; Romero G; Díaz JR
J Dairy Res; 2014 Aug; 81(3):350-7. PubMed ID: 24914749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Increased teat wall thickness in response to machine milking.
Stauffer C; Van der Vekens E; Stoffel MH; Schweizer D; Bruckmaier RM
J Dairy Sci; 2021 Aug; 104(8):9082-9092. PubMed ID: 34024610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Milking performance and udder health of cows milked with two different liners.
Rasmussen MD; Frimer ES; Kaartinen L; Jensen NE
J Dairy Res; 1998 Aug; 65(3):353-63. PubMed ID: 9718489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
