These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1645102)

  • 1. Human choice in "counterintuitive" situations: fixed- versus progressive-ratio schedules.
    Wanchisen BA; Tatham TA; Hineline PN
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1992 Jul; 58(1):67-85. PubMed ID: 1645102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pigeons' choices in situations of diminishing returns: fixed- versus progressive-ratio schedules.
    Wanchisen BA; Tatham TA; Hineline PN
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1988 Nov; 50(3):375-94. PubMed ID: 3209955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Humans' choices in situations of time-based diminishing returns: effects of fixed-interval duration and progressive-interval step size.
    Jacobs EA; Hackenberg TD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1996 Jan; 65(1):5-19. PubMed ID: 8583204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Human's choices in situations of time-based diminishing returns.
    Hackenberg TD; Axtell SA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1993 May; 59(3):445-70. PubMed ID: 8315364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Food motivated behavior of melanocortin-4 receptor knockout mice under a progressive ratio schedule.
    Vaughan C; Moore M; Haskell-Luevano C; Rowland NE
    Peptides; 2006 Nov; 27(11):2829-35. PubMed ID: 16930774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Some effects of reinforcement schedules in teaching picture names to retarded children.
    Stephens CE; Pear JJ; Wray LD; Jackson GC
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1975; 8(4):435-47. PubMed ID: 1194139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Schedules of reinforcement as determinants of human causality judgments and response rates.
    Reed P
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2001 Jul; 27(3):187-95. PubMed ID: 11497319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interlocking schedules: the relationship between response and time requirements.
    Rider DP
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1977 Jul; 28(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 903743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fixed and variable ratios and delays: further tests of an equivalence rule.
    Mazur JE
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1986 Apr; 12(2):116-24. PubMed ID: 3701262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Choice behavior in spontaneously hypertensive rats: variable vs. fixed schedules of reinforcement.
    Orduña V; García A; Hong E
    Behav Processes; 2010 May; 84(1):465-9. PubMed ID: 20060441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pigeons' choices between fixed-ratio and linear or geometric escalating schedules.
    Neuman P; Ahearn WH; Hineline PN
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2000 Jan; 73(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 10682342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Choice in situations of time-based diminishing returns: immediate versus delayed consequences of action.
    Hackenberg TD; Hineline PN
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1992 Jan; 57(1):67-80. PubMed ID: 1548449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Strategies of schedule preference in chimpanzees.
    Hodos W; Trumbule GH
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1967 Nov; 10(6):503-14. PubMed ID: 6080827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Long-term effects of suppressing the preratio pause.
    Derenne A; Richardson JV; Baron A
    Behav Processes; 2006 Mar; 72(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 16388917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Changes in progressive-ratio performance under increased pressures of air.
    Thomas JR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1974 May; 21(3):553-62. PubMed ID: 4838200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stimulus control of behavioral history.
    Freeman TJ; Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1992 Jan; 57(1):5-15. PubMed ID: 1548448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Molar optimization versus delayed reinforcement as explanations of choice between fixed-ratio and progressive-ratio schedules.
    Mazur JE; Vaughan W
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1987 Sep; 48(2):251-61. PubMed ID: 3681185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Concurrent second-order schedules: some effects of variations in response number and duration.
    Sealey DM; Sumpter CE; Temple W; Foster TM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2005 Jul; 84(1):19-35. PubMed ID: 16156135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diabetic type II Goto-Kakizaki rats show progressively decreasing exploratory activity and learning impairments in fixed and progressive ratios of a lever-press task.
    Moreira T; Malec E; Ostenson CG; Efendic S; Liljequist S
    Behav Brain Res; 2007 Jun; 180(1):28-41. PubMed ID: 17408764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Response rate and sensitivity to the molar feedback function relating response and reinforcement rate on VI+ schedules of reinforcement.
    Reed P
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2007 Oct; 33(4):428-39. PubMed ID: 17924790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.