BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16451245)

  • 1. Setting school-level outcome standards.
    Stern DT; Friedman Ben-David M; Norcini J; Wojtczak A; Schwarz MR
    Med Educ; 2006 Feb; 40(2):166-72. PubMed ID: 16451245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ensuring global standards for medical graduates: a pilot study of international standard-setting.
    Stern DT; Ben-David MF; De Champlain A; Hodges B; Wojtczak A; Schwarz MR
    Med Teach; 2005 May; 27(3):207-13. PubMed ID: 16011943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The outcomes of global minimum essential requirements (GMER) pilot implementation in China.
    Schwarz MR; Wojtczak A; Stern D
    Med Teach; 2007 Sep; 29(7):699-705. PubMed ID: 18236258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Description and impact of using a standard-setting method for determining pass/fail scores in a surgery clerkship.
    Schindler N; Corcoran J; DaRosa D
    Am J Surg; 2007 Feb; 193(2):252-7. PubMed ID: 17236857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The assessment of Global Minimum Essential Requirements in medical education.
    Stern DT; Wojtczak A; Schwarz MR;
    Med Teach; 2003 Nov; 25(6):589-95. PubMed ID: 15369906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Keeping granny safe on July 1: a consensus on minimum geriatrics competencies for graduating medical students.
    Leipzig RM; Granville L; Simpson D; Anderson MB; Sauvigné K; Soriano RP
    Acad Med; 2009 May; 84(5):604-10. PubMed ID: 19704193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Setting standards for performance tests: a pilot study of a three-level Angoff method.
    Yudkowsky R; Downing SM; Popescu M
    Acad Med; 2008 Oct; 83(10 Suppl):S13-6. PubMed ID: 18820491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Competency domains in an undergraduate Objective Structured Clinical Examination: their impact on compensatory standard setting.
    Reece A; Chung EM; Gardiner RM; Williams SE
    Med Educ; 2008 Jun; 42(6):600-6. PubMed ID: 18482091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Factor analysis can be a useful standard setting tool in a high stakes OSCE assessment.
    Chesser AM; Laing MR; Miedzybrodzka ZH; Brittenden J; Heys SD
    Med Educ; 2004 Aug; 38(8):825-31. PubMed ID: 15271042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accreditation standards of osteopathic and allopathic medical schools: could they affect educational quality?
    Wood DL; Hahn MB
    Acad Med; 2009 Jun; 84(6):724-8. PubMed ID: 19474546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A structured assessment of newly qualified medical graduates.
    Burch VC; Nash RC; Zabow T; Gibbs T; Aubin L; Jacobs B; Hift RJ
    Med Educ; 2005 Jul; 39(7):723-31. PubMed ID: 15960793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effectiveness of medical school admissions criteria in predicting residency ranking four years later.
    Peskun C; Detsky A; Shandling M
    Med Educ; 2007 Jan; 41(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 17209893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Who will pass the dental OSCE? Comparison of the Angoff and the borderline regression standard setting methods.
    Schoonheim-Klein M; Muijtjens A; Habets L; Manogue M; van der Vleuten C; van der Velden U
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2009 Aug; 13(3):162-71. PubMed ID: 19630935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The relationship between second-year medical students' OSCE scores and USMLE Step 2 scores.
    Simon SR; Bui A; Day S; Berti D; Volkan K
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2007 Dec; 13(6):901-5. PubMed ID: 18070260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Standard setting for progress tests: combining external and internal standards.
    Ricketts C; Freeman AC; Coombes LR
    Med Educ; 2009 Jun; 43(6):589-93. PubMed ID: 19493184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Longterm effects of problem-based learning: a comparison of competencies acquired by graduates of a problem-based and a conventional medical school.
    Schmidt HG; Vermeulen L; van der Molen HT
    Med Educ; 2006 Jun; 40(6):562-7. PubMed ID: 16700772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do students have sufficient knowledge of clinical anatomy?
    Prince KJ; Scherpbier AJ; van Mameren H; Drukker J; van der Vleuten CP
    Med Educ; 2005 Mar; 39(3):326-32. PubMed ID: 15733169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Variation in passing standards for graduation-level knowledge items at UK medical schools.
    Taylor CA; Gurnell M; Melville CR; Kluth DC; Johnson N; Wass V
    Med Educ; 2017 Jun; 51(6):612-620. PubMed ID: 28295495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does feedback matter? Practice-based learning for medical students after a multi-institutional clinical performance examination.
    Srinivasan M; Hauer KE; Der-Martirosian C; Wilkes M; Gesundheit N
    Med Educ; 2007 Sep; 41(9):857-65. PubMed ID: 17727526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of ECFMG certifying examinations for national comparisons: performance of graduates of Israeli medical schools in basic and clinical science examinations.
    Sutnick AI; Friedman M; Wilson MP; Razin S; Sperling O; Gutman D; Glick S
    Isr J Med Sci; 1995 Apr; 31(4):250-4. PubMed ID: 7721567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.