BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16451435)

  • 1. A laboratory study to determine the effects of universal and rotating ultrasonic inserts on wrist movement and scaling time efficiency of dental hygienists.
    Hawn CC; Tolle SL; Darby M; Walker M
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2006 Feb; 4(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 16451435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of 5 different finger rest positions on arm muscle activity during scaling by dental hygiene students.
    Cosaboom-FitzSimons ME; Tolle SL; Darby ML; Walker ML
    J Dent Hyg; 2008; 82(4):34. PubMed ID: 18755067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficiency of subgingival calculus removal with the Vector-system compared to ultrasonic scaling and hand instrumentation in vitro.
    Braun A; Krause F; Frentzen M; Jepsen S
    J Periodontal Res; 2005 Feb; 40(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 15613079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Coupling between wrist flexion-extension and radial-ulnar deviation.
    Li ZM; Kuxhaus L; Fisk JA; Christophel TH
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Feb; 20(2):177-83. PubMed ID: 15621323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A clinical and SEM evaluation of the efficiency of sofscale gel and hand scaling and hand scaling alone.
    Thomas K; Vandana KL; Reddy VR
    Indian J Dent Res; 2002; 13(3-4):173-82. PubMed ID: 12765098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of ultrasonic scaling and hand-activated scaling on tactile sensitivity in dental hygiene students.
    Ryan DL; Darby M; Bauman D; Tolle SL; Naik D
    J Dent Hyg; 2005; 79(1):9. PubMed ID: 16197758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of ulnar deviation of the wrist combined with flexion/extension on the maximum voluntary contraction of grip.
    Haque S; Khan AA
    J Hum Ergol (Tokyo); 2009 Jun; 38(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 20034313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Maximum acceptable frequencies for females performing a drilling task in different wrist postures.
    Davis PJ; Fernandez JE
    J Hum Ergol (Tokyo); 1994 Dec; 23(2):81-92. PubMed ID: 7730601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ultrasonic Instrumentation Instruction in Dental Hygiene Programs in the United States.
    Hinchman SS; Funk A; DeBiase C; Frere C
    J Dent Hyg; 2016 Apr; 90(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 27105792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Significant influence of scaler tip design on root substance loss resulting from ultrasonic scaling: a laserprofilometric in vitro study.
    Jepsen S; Ayna M; Hedderich J; Eberhard J
    J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Nov; 31(11):1003-6. PubMed ID: 15491317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A clinical evaluation of hand and ultrasonic instruments on subgingival debridement. 1. With unmodified and modified ultrasonic inserts.
    Dragoo MR
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1992; 12(4):310-23. PubMed ID: 1428611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Quanticalc clinical comparison of professional efficiency in manual supragingival calculus debridement.
    White DJ; Cox ER; Bacca L; Lanzalaco AC; Montgomery RM; Coyle-Rees M; Beiswanger BB; Mau M; Arends J
    J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(2 Spec No):54-7. PubMed ID: 9238899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effectiveness of two sonic and two ultrasonic scaler tips in furcations.
    Patterson M; Eick JD; Eberhart AB; Gross K; Killoy WJ
    J Periodontol; 1989 Jun; 60(6):325-9. PubMed ID: 2674397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Comparative efficiency of 3 experimental ultrasonic instruments in vivo].
    Roig R
    J Parodontol; 1990 Sep; 9(3):253-6. PubMed ID: 2231394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vivo ultrasonic debridement forces in bicuspids: a pilot study.
    Ruppert M; Cadosch J; Guindy J; Case D; Zappa U
    J Periodontol; 2002 Apr; 73(4):418-22. PubMed ID: 11990443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Aerosol and splatter production by focused spray and standard ultrasonic inserts.
    Rivera-Hidalgo F; Barnes JB; Harrel SK
    J Periodontol; 1999 May; 70(5):473-7. PubMed ID: 10368050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy and reliability of three different techniques for manual goniometry for wrist motion: a cadaveric study.
    Carter TI; Pansy B; Wolff AL; Hillstrom HJ; Backus SI; Lenhoff M; Wolfe SW
    J Hand Surg Am; 2009 Oct; 34(8):1422-8. PubMed ID: 19703734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficacy of 5 machining instruments in scaling of molar furcations.
    Takacs VJ; Lie T; Perala DG; Adams DF
    J Periodontol; 1993 Mar; 64(3):228-36. PubMed ID: 8463946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Calculus removal with diamond-coated ultrasonic inserts in vitro.
    Yukna RA; Vastardis S; Mayer ET
    J Periodontol; 2007 Jan; 78(1):122-6. PubMed ID: 17199548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vitro calculus detection with a moved smart ultrasonic device.
    Meissner G; Oehme B; Strackeljan J; Kocher T
    J Clin Periodontol; 2006 Feb; 33(2):130-4. PubMed ID: 16441738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.