These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16451632)
1. Local false discovery rate and minimum total error rate approaches to identifying interesting chromosomal regions. Sinha R; Sinha M; Mathew G; Elston RC; Luo Y BMC Genet; 2005 Dec; 6 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S23. PubMed ID: 16451632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Genome scan linkage analysis comparing microsatellites and single-nucleotide polymorphisms markers for two measures of alcoholism in chromosomes 1, 4, and 7. Chen G; Adeyemo A; Zhou J; Yuan A; Chen Y; Rotimi C BMC Genet; 2005 Dec; 6 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S4. PubMed ID: 16451650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimized multi-stage designs controlling the false discovery or the family-wise error rate. Zehetmayer S; Bauer P; Posch M Stat Med; 2008 Sep; 27(21):4145-60. PubMed ID: 18444249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multiple testing. Part I. Single-step procedures for control of general type I error rates. Dudoit S; van der Laan MJ; Pollard KS Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2004; 3():Article13. PubMed ID: 16646791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Genome scan of schizophrenia. Levinson DF; Mahtani MM; Nancarrow DJ; Brown DM; Kruglyak L; Kirby A; Hayward NK; Crowe RR; Andreasen NC; Black DW; Silverman JM; Endicott J; Sharpe L; Mohs RC; Siever LJ; Walters MK; Lennon DP; Jones HL; Nertney DA; Daly MJ; Gladis M; Mowry BJ Am J Psychiatry; 1998 Jun; 155(6):741-50. PubMed ID: 9619145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Power and type I error rate of false discovery rate approaches in genome-wide association studies. Yang Q; Cui J; Chazaro I; Cupples LA; Demissie S BMC Genet; 2005 Dec; 6 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S134. PubMed ID: 16451593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Controlling the proportion of false positives in multiple dependent tests. Fernando RL; Nettleton D; Southey BR; Dekkers JC; Rothschild MF; Soller M Genetics; 2004 Jan; 166(1):611-9. PubMed ID: 15020448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mixed directional false discovery rate control in multiple pairwise comparisons using weighted p-values. Zhao H; Peddada SD; Cui X Biom J; 2015 Jan; 57(1):144-58. PubMed ID: 25410394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of a misspecification of response rates on type I and type II errors, in a phase II Simon design. Baey C; Le Deley MC Eur J Cancer; 2011 Jul; 47(11):1647-52. PubMed ID: 21493059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Linkage and association analysis in pedigrees from different populations. Beyene J; Yan J; Greenwood CM BMC Genet; 2005 Dec; 6 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S59. PubMed ID: 16451671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. On the assessment of statistical significance in disease-gene discovery. Zhao LP; Prentice R; Shen F; Hsu L Am J Hum Genet; 1999 Jun; 64(6):1739-53. PubMed ID: 10330362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Simple estimators of false discovery rates given as few as one or two p-values without strong parametric assumptions. Bickel DR Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2013 Aug; 12(4):529-43. PubMed ID: 23798617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Microsatellite genotyping errors: detection approaches, common sources and consequences for paternal exclusion. Hoffman JI; Amos W Mol Ecol; 2005 Feb; 14(2):599-612. PubMed ID: 15660949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. On the sample size requirement in genetic association tests when the proportion of false positives is controlled. Zou G; Zuo Y Genetics; 2006 Jan; 172(1):687-91. PubMed ID: 16204206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Statistical significance for genomewide studies. Storey JD; Tibshirani R Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2003 Aug; 100(16):9440-5. PubMed ID: 12883005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improved estimation of the noncentrality parameter distribution from a large number of t-statistics, with applications to false discovery rate estimation in microarray data analysis. Qu L; Nettleton D; Dekkers JC Biometrics; 2012 Dec; 68(4):1178-87. PubMed ID: 22551000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of error rates in single-arm versus randomized phase II cancer clinical trials. Tang H; Foster NR; Grothey A; Ansell SM; Goldberg RM; Sargent DJ J Clin Oncol; 2010 Apr; 28(11):1936-41. PubMed ID: 20212253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An improved nonparametric approach for detecting differentially expressed genes with replicated microarray data. Zhang S Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2006; 5():Article30. PubMed ID: 17402914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Rank-invariant resampling based estimation of false discovery rate for analysis of small sample microarray data. Jain N; Cho H; O'Connell M; Lee JK BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 6():187. PubMed ID: 16042779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Genome-wide scan for genes involved in bipolar affective disorder in 70 European families ascertained through a bipolar type I early-onset proband: supportive evidence for linkage at 3p14. Etain B; Mathieu F; Rietschel M; Maier W; Albus M; McKeon P; Roche S; Kealey C; Blackwood D; Muir W; Bellivier F; Henry C; Dina C; Gallina S; Gurling H; Malafosse A; Preisig M; Ferrero F; Cichon S; Schumacher J; Ohlraun S; Borrmann-Hassenbach M; Propping P; Abou Jamra R; Schulze TG; Marusic A; Dernovsek ZM; Giros B; Bourgeron T; Lemainque A; Bacq D; Betard C; Charon C; Nöthen MM; Lathrop M; Leboyer M Mol Psychiatry; 2006 Jul; 11(7):685-94. PubMed ID: 16534504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]