These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16451672)

  • 21. Interpretation of simultaneous linkage and family-based association tests in genome screens.
    Chung RH; Hauser ER; Martin ER
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Feb; 31(2):134-42. PubMed ID: 17123303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Examining the effect of linkage disequilibrium on multipoint linkage analysis.
    Huang Q; Shete S; Swartz M; Amos CI
    BMC Genet; 2005 Dec; 6 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S83. PubMed ID: 16451698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Reconstructing parental genotypes when testing for linkage in the presence of association.
    Knapp M
    Theor Popul Biol; 2001 Nov; 60(3):141-8. PubMed ID: 11855948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Handling marker-marker linkage disequilibrium: pedigree analysis with clustered markers.
    Abecasis GR; Wigginton JE
    Am J Hum Genet; 2005 Nov; 77(5):754-67. PubMed ID: 16252236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Genotyping errors, pedigree errors, and missing data.
    Hinrichs AL; Suarez BK
    Genet Epidemiol; 2005; 29 Suppl 1():S120-4. PubMed ID: 16342180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Accounting for linkage disequilibrium among markers in linkage analysis: impact of haplotype frequency estimation and molecular haplotypes for a gene in a candidate region for Alzheimer's disease.
    Sieh W; Yu CE; Bird TD; Schellenberg GD; Wijsman EM
    Hum Hered; 2007; 63(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 17215579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Accounting for linkage in family-based tests of association with missing parental genotypes.
    Martin ER; Bass MP; Hauser ER; Kaplan NL
    Am J Hum Genet; 2003 Nov; 73(5):1016-26. PubMed ID: 14551902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Precision and type I error rate in the presence of genotype errors and missing parental data: a comparison between the original transmission disequilibrium test (TDT) and TDTae statistics.
    Barral S; Haynes C; Levenstien MA; Gordon D
    BMC Genet; 2005 Dec; 6 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S150. PubMed ID: 16451611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Handling linkage disequilibrium in qualitative trait linkage analysis using dense SNPs: a two-step strategy.
    Cho K; Dupuis J
    BMC Genet; 2009 Aug; 10():44. PubMed ID: 19664279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effect of missing data on linkage disequilibrium mapping and haplotype association analysis in the GAW14 simulated datasets.
    McCaskie PA; Carter KW; McCaskie SR; Palmer LJ
    BMC Genet; 2005 Dec; 6 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S151. PubMed ID: 16451612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Guidelines for genotyping in genomewide linkage studies: single-nucleotide-polymorphism maps versus microsatellite maps.
    Evans DM; Cardon LR
    Am J Hum Genet; 2004 Oct; 75(4):687-92. PubMed ID: 15311375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. SimPed: a simulation program to generate haplotype and genotype data for pedigree structures.
    Leal SM; Yan K; Müller-Myhsok B
    Hum Hered; 2005; 60(2):119-22. PubMed ID: 16224189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Handling linkage disequilibrium in linkage analysis using dense single-nucleotide polymorphisms.
    Cho K; Yang Q; Dupuis J
    BMC Proc; 2007; 1 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S161. PubMed ID: 18466507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparing single-nucleotide polymorphism marker-based and microsatellite marker-based linkage analyses.
    Ulgen A; Li W
    BMC Genet; 2005 Dec; 6 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S13. PubMed ID: 16451588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. HAPLORE: a program for haplotype reconstruction in general pedigrees without recombination.
    Zhang K; Sun F; Zhao H
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jan; 21(1):90-103. PubMed ID: 15231536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparative informativeness for linkage of multiple SNPs and single microsatellites.
    Lindholm E; Hodge SE; Greenberg DA
    Hum Hered; 2004; 58(3-4):164-70. PubMed ID: 15812173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A Consensus Genetic Map for Pinus taeda and Pinus elliottii and Extent of Linkage Disequilibrium in Two Genotype-Phenotype Discovery Populations of Pinus taeda.
    Westbrook JW; Chhatre VE; Wu LS; Chamala S; Neves LG; Muñoz P; Martínez-García PJ; Neale DB; Kirst M; Mockaitis K; Nelson CD; Peter GF; Davis JM; Echt CS
    G3 (Bethesda); 2015 Jun; 5(8):1685-94. PubMed ID: 26068575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Quantifying the amount of missing information in genetic association studies.
    Nicolae DL
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Dec; 30(8):703-17. PubMed ID: 16986163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Which strategy is better for linkage analysis: single-nucleotide polymorphisms or microsatellites? Evaluation by identity-by-state-identity-by-descent transformation affected sib-pair method on GAW14 data.
    Yue Q; Apprey V; Bonney GE
    BMC Genet; 2005 Dec; 6 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S16. PubMed ID: 16451621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. An exploration of sex-specific linkage disequilibrium on chromosome X in Caucasians from the COGA study.
    Cox ME; Campbell JK; Langefeld CD
    BMC Genet; 2005 Dec; 6 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S81. PubMed ID: 16451696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.