159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1645373)
1. Comparison of standard culture methods, a shell vial assay, and a DNA probe for the detection of herpes simplex virus.
Seal LA; Toyama PS; Fleet KM; Lerud KS; Heth SR; Moorman AJ; Woods JC; Hill RB
J Clin Microbiol; 1991 Mar; 29(3):650-2. PubMed ID: 1645373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Chemicon SimulFluor direct fluorescent antibody staining with cell culture and shell vial direct immunoperoxidase staining for detection of herpes simplex virus and with cytospin direct immunofluorescence staining for detection of varicella-zoster virus.
Chan EL; Brandt K; Horsman GB
Clin Diagn Lab Immunol; 2001 Sep; 8(5):909-12. PubMed ID: 11527802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Rapid detection of herpes simplex virus in culture by in situ hybridization.
Heggie AD; Huang YT
J Virol Methods; 1993 Jan; 41(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 8381792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Detection of herpes simplex virus in conventional tube cell cultures and in shell vials with a DNA probe kit and monoclonal antibodies.
Espy MJ; Smith TF
J Clin Microbiol; 1988 Jan; 26(1):22-4. PubMed ID: 2830298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Herpes simplex virus detection from genital lesions: a comparative study using antigen detection (HerpChek) and culture.
Cone RW; Swenson PD; Hobson AC; Remington M; Corey L
J Clin Microbiol; 1993 Jul; 31(7):1774-6. PubMed ID: 8394375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of enzyme immunoassay, shell vial culture, and conventional cell culture for the rapid detection of herpes simplex virus.
Johnston SL; Siegel CS
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1990; 13(3):241-4. PubMed ID: 2166633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cytospin-enhanced direct immunofluorescence assay versus cell culture for detection of herpes simplex virus in clinical specimens.
Sanders C; Nelson C; Hove M; Woods GL
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1998 Oct; 32(2):111-3. PubMed ID: 9823534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Rapid culture confirmation of herpes simplex virus by a monoclonal antibody-based enzyme immunoassay.
Patel H; Frenkel LD; Greenhalgh M; Howell R; Patel S
J Clin Microbiol; 1991 Feb; 29(2):410-2. PubMed ID: 1848869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of a direct antigen enzyme immunoassay, Herpchek, with cell culture for detection of herpes simplex virus from clinical specimens.
Verano L; Michalski FJ
J Clin Microbiol; 1995 May; 33(5):1378-9. PubMed ID: 7615760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Simultaneous detection of and differentiation between herpes simplex and varicella-zoster viruses with two fluorescent probes in the same test system.
Brumback BG; Farthing PG; Castellino SN
J Clin Microbiol; 1993 Dec; 31(12):3260-3. PubMed ID: 8308120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Centrifugation-shell vial technique for rapid detection of herpes simplex virus cytopathic effect in Vero cells.
Pruneda RC; Almanza I
J Clin Microbiol; 1987 Feb; 25(2):423-4. PubMed ID: 3029174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnosis of herpes simplex virus infections in the clinical laboratory by LightCycler PCR.
Espy MJ; Uhl JR; Mitchell PS; Thorvilson JN; Svien KA; Wold AD; Smith TF
J Clin Microbiol; 2000 Feb; 38(2):795-9. PubMed ID: 10655387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Detection of herpes simplex virus DNA from genital lesions by in situ hybridization.
Langenberg A; Smith D; Brakel CL; Pollice M; Remington M; Winter C; Dunne A; Corey L
J Clin Microbiol; 1988 May; 26(5):933-7. PubMed ID: 2838505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of primary rabbit kidney and MRC-5 cells and two stain procedures for herpes simplex virus detection by a shell vial centrifugation method.
Peterson EM; Hughes BL; Aarnaes SL; de la Maza LM
J Clin Microbiol; 1988 Feb; 26(2):222-4. PubMed ID: 2449455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Detection of herpes simplex virus in clinical specimens using a DNA probe after centrifugal inoculation of A549 cells.
Woods GL; Yam P
J Virol Methods; 1989 Mar; 23(3):339-43. PubMed ID: 2541157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of shell vial culture and the suspension-infection method for the rapid detection of herpes simplex viruses.
Johnson FB; Luker G; Chow C
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1993 Jan; 16(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 8381064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection of herpes simplex virus by a nonradiometric spin-amplified in situ hybridization assay.
Forman MS; Merz CS; Charache P
J Clin Microbiol; 1992 Mar; 30(3):581-4. PubMed ID: 1372619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the sensitivity of a 24 h-shell vial assay, and conventional tube culture, in the isolation of Herpes simplex virus - 1 from corneal scrapings.
Athmanathan S; Bandlapally S; Rao GN
BMC Clin Pathol; 2002; 2(1):1. PubMed ID: 11882256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the Du Pont HERPCHEK herpes simplex virus antigen test with clinical specimens.
Wu TC; Zaza S; Callaway J
J Clin Microbiol; 1989 Aug; 27(8):1903-5. PubMed ID: 2549100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A rapid culture alternative to the shell-vial method for the detection of herpes simplex virus.
Johnson FB; Visick EM
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1992; 15(8):673-8. PubMed ID: 1335863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
