These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16454309)

  • 1. Speech perception from monaural and binaural information.
    Culling JF; Edmonds BA; Hodder KI
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Jan; 119(1):559-65. PubMed ID: 16454309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of audiovisual and binaural listening on the acceptable noise level (ANL): establishing an ANL conceptual model.
    Wu YH; Stangl E; Pang C; Zhang X
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Feb; 25(2):141-53. PubMed ID: 24828215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Amplitude-mapping effects on speech intelligibility with unilateral and bilateral cochlear implants.
    van Hoesel R; Böhm M; Battmer RD; Beckschebe J; Lenarz T
    Ear Hear; 2005 Aug; 26(4):381-8. PubMed ID: 16079633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Binaural modulation masking.
    Grantham DW; Bacon SP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Mar; 89(3):1340-9. PubMed ID: 2030221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Binaural sluggishness in the perception of tone sequences and speech in noise.
    Culling JF; Colburn HS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Jan; 107(1):517-27. PubMed ID: 10641660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Redundant Information Is Sometimes More Beneficial Than Spatial Information to Understand Speech in Noise.
    Dieudonné B; Francart T
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(3):545-554. PubMed ID: 30299342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Auditory filter bandwidths in binaural and monaural listening conditions.
    Kollmeier B; Holube I
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Oct; 92(4 Pt 1):1889-901. PubMed ID: 1401533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Binaural prediction of speech intelligibility in reverberant rooms with multiple noise sources.
    Lavandier M; Jelfs S; Culling JF; Watkins AJ; Raimond AP; Makin SJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jan; 131(1):218-31. PubMed ID: 22280586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Off-frequency BMLD: the role of monaural processing.
    van de Par S; Luebken B; Verhey JL; Kohlrausch A
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013; 787():293-301. PubMed ID: 23716235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The normalized correlation: accounting for binaural detection across center frequency.
    Bernstein LR; Trahiotis C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Dec; 100(6):3774-84. PubMed ID: 8969479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. NoSo and NoS pi detection as a function of masker bandwidth in normal-hearing and cochlear-impaired listeners.
    Staffel JG; Hall JW; Grose JH; Pillsbury HC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Apr; 87(4):1720-7. PubMed ID: 2341676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Monaural and interaural temporal modulation transfer functions measured with 5-kHz carriers.
    Stellmack MA; Viemeister NF; Byrne AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Oct; 118(4):2507-18. PubMed ID: 16266171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predicting binaural speech intelligibility using the signal-to-noise ratio in the envelope power spectrum domain.
    Chabot-Leclerc A; MacDonald EN; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jul; 140(1):192. PubMed ID: 27475146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of Additional Low-Pass-Filtered Speech on Listening Effort for Noise-Band-Vocoded Speech in Quiet and in Noise.
    Pals C; Sarampalis A; van Dijk M; Başkent D
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 29757801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Binaural advantage for sound pattern identification.
    Kidd G; Mason CR; Rohtla TL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Oct; 98(4):1977-86. PubMed ID: 7593920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of signal duration on NoSo and NoS pi thresholds at 500 Hz and 4 kHz.
    Bernstein LR; Trahiotis C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Mar; 105(3):1776-83. PubMed ID: 10089601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of random intensity fluctuation on monaural and binaural detection.
    Hall JW; Fernandes MA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Oct; 74(4):1200-3. PubMed ID: 6643842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Binaural masking release in children with Down syndrome.
    Porter HL; Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Tharpe AM
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(4):e134-42. PubMed ID: 24535557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Acceptance of noise with monaural and binaural amplification.
    Freyaldenhoven MC; Plyler PN; Thelin JW; Burchfield SB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2006 Oct; 17(9):659-66. PubMed ID: 17039768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modeling Sluggishness in Binaural Unmasking of Speech for Maskers With Time-Varying Interaural Phase Differences.
    Hauth CF; Brand T
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216517753547. PubMed ID: 29338577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.